CyberArk Certificate Manager vs Frontegg comparison

CyberArk and Frontegg are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while Frontegg is ranked #35. CyberArk holds a 1.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Frontegg’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Frontegg users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Read 13 CyberArk Certificate Manager reviews

1,175 Views
811 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

812 Views
235 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Frontegg

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2025

CyberArk Certificate Manager and Frontegg compete in identity and access management solutions. CyberArk seems to have the upper hand in security features, while Frontegg leads in versatility.

Features: CyberArk Certificate Manager offers advanced certificate lifecycle management, robust security protocols, and strong compliance features. Frontegg provides versatile authentication features, including single sign-on (SSO), API integrations, and audit logging.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing integration capabilities, and reducing setup times. Frontegg might benefit from extending its security features, offering more customization options, and improving the user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk involves a comprehensive setup with strong customer service to support users through lengthy implementations. Frontegg provides fast deployment through plug-and-play capabilities along with efficient customer support, allowing quick integration into systems.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk typically has higher setup costs due to its focus on security features, providing long-term ROI from enhanced security compliance. Frontegg offers competitive pricing with flexible models, ensuring a rapid ROI and appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Certificate Manager

Ranking in Authentication Systems

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

35th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (19th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Certificate Manager is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Frontegg is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Venafi	1.3%
Frontegg	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.

Read full review

reviewer1660836

DevOps Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system

It would be nice to have a export button to file with all tenants/users so that in case of a disaster we will have the option to restore the users from file. For security certifications, we need to make sure we can restore all of our products and data in minimal time. We are backing up the data using the API but it will be better to export everything to an external file so in case of a disaster or mistake from our side, we can have the option to reload all the users and assign them to the relevant tenant as fast as possible

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is their certificate discovery."

"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."

"Venafi is super stable, and we experienced no issues with its stability."

"The support is definitely great. What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered. That's probably the biggest thing. Besides the fact that it's a mature product and it works, the support is a big deal."

"Automating anything, whether on-prem or cloud, is possible."

"Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager pros

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

Cons

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

"Venafi could enhance its offerings by providing more automation features."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations."

"Currently lacks the capability to automatically download certificates in JKS."

"There's definitely lots of room for improvement with Venafi. They have a website where we can suggest new features, and they need to take that a little bit more seriously."

"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve."

More CyberArk Certificate Manager cons

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

For our budget, Venafi's cost is moderate. It's not expensive as internal certificate generation is free, and we only pay for the public CA certificate signer and for storage in Venafi. With the to...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

As an end user, I cannot specifically point out improvements, but I believe it would be beneficial to display active certificates in a separate column on the UI, so users can easily find what they ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AppViewX CERT+ vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 32% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 25% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs CyberArk Certificate Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More CyberArk Certificate Manager Competitors

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 51% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

Clerk.com vs Frontegg

Compared 9% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager

September 2025

Download CyberArk Certificate Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

September 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Also Known As

Venafi

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Certificate Manager automates and streamlines certificate processes, reducing errors and enhancing efficiency. It centralizes management, supports compliance, and improves certificate lifecycle management with customizable features.

CyberArk Certificate Manager offers a streamlined approach to managing certificates, focusing on automation that minimizes manual intervention and errors. Its discovery and centralized management enhance operational efficiency, while integration capabilities facilitate seamless handling of certificates across systems like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from its user-friendly, intuitive interface, robust reporting, and customizable notifications, which improve compliance, reduce bottlenecks, and allow for custom field creation. Though the on-premises version is mature, there is room for improvement in cloud service integration and out-of-the-box features. Additional enhancements are needed in documentation clarity, hardware security module support, and diverse scripting language support.

What are the most important features of CyberArk Certificate Manager?

Automation: Streamlines certificate processes to reduce errors and manual intervention.
Centralized Management: Consolidates certificate handling for enhanced efficiency.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates integration with platforms like AWS and Azure.
Customizable Notifications: Tailors notifications for compliance and operational efficiency.
Robust Reporting: Provides detailed insights into certificate statuses.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Error Reduction: Minimized manual errors due to automated processes.
Enhanced Security: Centralized management improves security and governance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines management to reduce bottlenecks.
Compliance Support: Integrates processes that ensure regulatory compliance.

CyberArk Certificate Manager finds applications across multiple industries like finance and healthcare where stringent security protocols are critical. Organizations use it for server authentication and managing application IDs, ensuring compliance and preventing outages. Its integration with major cloud platforms and automation of installations across endpoints makes it an ideal choice for companies focusing on enhancing security and operational efficiency.

CyberArk

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Sample Customers

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg

September 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Certificate Manager vs. Frontegg report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.