

CrowdStrike Falcon and Google Chronicle Suite compete in the cybersecurity domain, both offering valuable features for threat detection and management. CrowdStrike Falcon has a slight edge with its advanced EDR capabilities, real-time responses, and comprehensive endpoint visibility.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon is valued for its powerful EDR capabilities, real-time response, and comprehensive endpoint activity visibility. It uses AI and ML for intelligent threat detection with minimal system impact. Google Chronicle Suite emphasizes efficient threat hunting and data analysis, praised for its speed, performance, and seamless integration with Google services, making it ideal for handling large-scale data.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon could improve its reporting, dashboard functionality, and integration with other security technologies. Enhancements in compatibility with legacy systems and more user interface customization would be beneficial. Google Chronicle Suite could benefit from a more intuitive user interface and immediate threat detection. Better customization for alerts and reduced false positives would enhance its functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon offers flexible deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds. While its customer support is generally reliable, improvements in timeliness and consistency would be helpful. Google Chronicle Suite is primarily available on public and hybrid clouds, with customer service noted for good response times and support quality but could improve in personalization.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for its higher pricing, reflecting its extensive security features, and offers a good return on investment through reduced incidents and operational efficiencies. Its higher cost is justified by the value it provides. Google Chronicle Suite's pricing is competitive and cost-effective relative to data ingestion, delivering good ROI through efficient threat management and data handling.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
We are a critical project for them at this moment, and they provide excellent service.
They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions.
I have faced challenges with technical support from Sentinel, though Sentinel support is better than Google's, while Splunk support is also not that great.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
I rate the scalability of Google Chronicle Suite as ten out of ten.
Google Chronicle Suite is very scalable, being a cloud-based solution.
In the cloud-native space, the problem is that if you require additional devices, you might have to work on custom applications.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
I rate the stability of Google Chronicle Suite as a nine, as I have not encountered any stability issues.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience.
The UI is the primary challenge in need of improvement.
Google Chronicle Suite lacks near time detection.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
It's neither expensive nor cheap, and I believe it is a justified price for the features offered.
Compared to a SIEM like Microsoft Sentinel, it is much more affordable.
I experience Chronicle as less expensive and less complicated than Azure.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
They also combine their source solution into one product, allowing for out-of-the-box playbook creation and incident response.
The AI infused into the platform helps in investigations and rule creation.
The automated response feature allows for immediate actions like isolating infected machines or blocking malicious IP addresses.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 3.3% |
| Google Chronicle Suite | 2.0% |
| Other | 94.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
CrowdStrike Falcon provides cutting-edge endpoint detection with automatic alerts, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration capabilities. Cloud-native architecture and AI-driven processes ensure scalable protection and efficient threat remediation.
CrowdStrike Falcon is recognized for its robust EDR and threat intelligence features that enhance security and streamline operations. Its lightweight agent minimizes system impact while offering real-time monitoring and detailed reporting. This platform uses cloud-native architecture for scalable, consistent protection, significantly reducing administrative demands. AI and machine learning empower precise threat hunting and behavioral analysis, which mitigates false positives and boosts cybersecurity efficiency. Users seek improvements in integration with other systems, reporting functions, and compatibility with specific operating systems. While the solution handles malware mitigation and threat response efficiently, suggestions for on-demand scanning, enhanced visibility, and better dashboard features are noted.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In technology sectors, CrowdStrike Falcon commonly supports endpoint protection and threat response initiatives, allowing companies to replace traditional antivirus systems with more advanced solutions. In finance, it secures sensitive data across multiple platforms, ensuring compliance. In healthcare, real-time security analysis protects patient data on critical devices like servers and laptops, utilizing AI to enhance cybersecurity defenses.
Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.
Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.
What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.