Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs Honeycomb Enterprise comparison

Broadcom and Honeycomb.io are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while Honeycomb.io is ranked #27 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Honeycomb.io’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Honeycomb.io users who would recommend it.

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Read 2 Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management reviews

117 Views
117 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Honeycomb Enterprise

Read 2 Honeycomb Enterprise reviews

2,534 Views
2,407 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Honeycomb Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management and Honeycomb Enterprise are competing in performance management and observability. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management leads in customer satisfaction for pricing and support, while Honeycomb Enterprise is considered superior for its robust features.

Features: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management features a comprehensive view of enterprise application performance, detailed diagnostics, and application resource optimization. Honeycomb Enterprise offers advanced observability, real-time event tracking, and deep analytical insights for complex systems, showcasing its superior data analysis capability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Honeycomb Enterprise provides a straightforward, efficient cloud-native deployment model supported by exceptional customer service. Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management requires a more complex integration into existing environments but is supported by robust customer service for the involved setup process.

Pricing and ROI: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides competitive pricing, ensuring good ROI for comprehensive application performance solutions. Honeycomb Enterprise, positioned at a higher price point, offers significant ROI through advanced features and data capabilities, appealing to enterprises prioritizing cutting-edge observability features despite the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

49th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Honeycomb Enterprise

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Diego Gomes De Lima

Senior Software Engineer at SumUp

Easy to use and the dashboard is very intuitive

We faced some OpenTelemetry metrics lost between the communication from the service and the Honeycomb.io. I can't say if this is a Honeycomb.io issue or if there are some limitations in OpenTelemetry. Alerts are very helpful in Honeycomb.io, but we don't usually merge because we can compare queries with queries for making alerts. We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The technical support and documentation are quite good."

"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."

Cons

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?

The solution is mainly used for stack observability. It observes service behavior or any kind of failure that may be happening. The tool is also related to research. My company is working more on t...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?

We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 21% of the time

Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Honeycomb Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Download Honeycomb Enterprise product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Grit

Overview

CA Cross-Enterprise APM provides 24/7 monitoring of business transactions for complex application environments by monitoring the real-time performance of mainframe subsystems and providing CA Application Performance Management with this data on a single pane of glass.

Broadcom

Honeycomb Enterprise is designed to optimize performance visibility, offering a robust platform for distributed system observability. It provides insights for complex data and aids in faster issue resolution, making it a valuable tool for IT professionals.

This tool is tailored for real-time data tracking and improving system performance efficiency. Enterprises benefit from its capacity to handle large-scale data, ensuring seamless operations and continuity. Honeycomb Enterprise helps teams to tackle data challenges head-on by delivering comprehensive analytics that enhance infrastructure reliability and performance metrics.

What Features Make Honeycomb Enterprise Stand Out?

High-Resolution Visibility: Enables detailed system monitoring to identify issues quickly.
Trace Analysis: Offers powerful tracing of distributed systems for in-depth insights.
Data Scalability: Manages extensive data sets effortlessly for better decision-making.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides instant alerts to preempt potential disruptions.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork with integrated tools enhancing productivity.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Downtime: Faster detection and resolution of issues minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resources leading to lower operational costs.
Improved Decision Making: Enhanced data analytics lead to smarter business strategies.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes improve team efficiency and output quality.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and technology, Honeycomb Enterprise implementations demonstrate its utility in managing complex data flows and optimizing system reliability. Businesses in these sectors leverage its capabilities to maintain high service standards and operational efficiency.

Honeycomb.io

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender

Buyer's Guide

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

July 2025

Free Report: Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. Honeycomb Enterprise report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.