Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
With premium support, core Palo Alto technical experts handle issues directly.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
The Palo Alto support team is fully responsive and helpful.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
Overall, Cortex XSIAM is stable.
It works really nice and performs really efficiently after configuration.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long.
Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports.
Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
The product is very expensive.
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
The advanced visualization capabilities of the product are important for understanding security trends in an organization.
One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities.
The flexibility for creating manual workflows stands out.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 1.8% |
| Logpoint | 1.2% |
| Other | 97.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
