Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Malwarebytes Teams comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Palo Alto Networks and Malwarebytes are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.8, while Malwarebytes is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5. Palo Alto Networks holds a 3.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Malwarebytes’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Malwarebytes users who would recommend it.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Read 122 Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks reviews

28,091 Views
15,450 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes Teams

Read 37 Malwarebytes Teams reviews

7,117 Views
6,263 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Malwarebytes Teams

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks compete in the endpoint security solutions category. Cortex XDR appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced AI integration and robust security features, making it suitable for complex environments.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams is known for its user-friendliness, effective threat detection, and system restoration capabilities. It includes a cloud management feature that enhances accessibility by allowing remote monitoring and quick threat resolution. In contrast, Cortex XDR integrates AI and machine learning for detailed threat analysis and incident response, offering comprehensive visibility into network activities and robust endpoint protection.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could improve its reporting capabilities and reduce false positives. Some users find challenges in integration and scalability. Cortex XDR needs better integration with various platforms, cost reduction, and improved UI. Users also suggest that its AI-driven functions could be more flexible and user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams supports flexible deployment models, including public and private clouds, and on-premises setups, and is praised for straightforward deployment and reliable support. Cortex XDR focuses on cloud deployments, offering scalability and integration, although its support is perceived as needing enhancement for timely issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is competitively priced, offering significant value in productivity and endpoint stability, while being more affordable than high-end solutions. Cortex XDR comes at a higher cost due to its advanced capabilities but offers valuable ROI through comprehensive protection and reduced risk.

To learn more, read our detailed Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (3rd), Ransomware Protection (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

Malwarebytes Teams

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.5%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.5%
Other	94.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"These days it's machine-learning technology and behavior-based analytics features that make us more secure."

"The tool is designed to scale for large enterprises and handle large volumes of data."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"I don't have to do much monitoring with it; I don't have to have anybody manually looking at this, it gives us reports, and it lets us know if something needs to be addressed, and we can easily address it."

"If any application performs suspicious activities, such as changing registries or modifying other applications, Cortex XDR detects and blocks the entire application."

"The biggest positive impact I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a significant reduction in the number of people required to manage it."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to rapidly detect certain hardware files."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks saves time in various ways, although the user interface is fairly standard."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The platform is straightforward to install."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"Considering the overall management of the system and seeing what is being protected, it is doing a great job."

"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."

"I never have to look at it or do anything with it, and then my system just stays clean."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

Cons

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"To jump from the partner to Palo Alto directly was challenging."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"For working with the solution, you only really need a web browser, however, we've found that working on Chrome, for example, is horrible."

"The deployment is pretty hard."

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

"There's no indication on the system as to when the software is doing a scan."

"Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability."

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"Malwarebytes is not there in the reports from Gartner or IDC...If we look at the market trends and the industry, most customers look at Gartner's reports to identify whether a product is a leader, challenger, or a big product, depending on which they choose."

"The product update capability needs to be improved."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"It is "expensive" and flexible."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. The ability to reverse damage caused by ransomware with minimal interruptions to...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Malwarebytes?

My primary use case is that it's protecting me against malware.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 2% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

October 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Malwarebytes Teams delivers top-tier protection with its user-friendly interface, strong endpoint security, and comprehensive threat detection.

Malwarebytes Teams offers exceptional malware detection and response capabilities, supported by strong endpoint protection and frequent updates. Its cloud management and flexible deployment options ensure comprehensive security without hindering user activities. Despite facing challenges like false positives and interface complexity, it excels in anti-ransomware features and behavior-based detection, making it a reliable choice for managing suspicious events and unauthorized access. The tool is particularly beneficial in cyber defense, providing real-time protection and blocking malicious files effectively.

What features define Malwarebytes Teams?

Endpoint Protection: Offers strong defense against threats at endpoint levels.
Scanning Capabilities: Provides thorough scanning for malware detection.
Remote Cloud Management: Enables managing security remotely through the cloud.
Anti-ransomware: Features robust protection against ransomware threats.
Behavior-based Detection: Utilizes behavior analysis for threat identification.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security Maintenance: Ensures uncompromised security without disrupting activities.
Customer Support: Delivers efficient customer assistance for user issues.
Lightweight Performance: Operates without significant performance dips.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides clear insights into security threats.

In specific industries, Malwarebytes Teams is leveraged for endpoint monitoring and malware prevention. It is favored in cybersecurity operations for automated remediation and compliance scanning, offering ease of use and background operation to ensure seamless protection of endpoints and server integrity.

Malwarebytes

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Knutson Construction

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams

November 2026

Free Report: Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams

Find out what your peers are saying about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Malwarebytes Teams report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.