Coralogix vs Pandora FMS comparison

Coralogix and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.3, while Pandora FMS is ranked #63. Coralogix holds a 1.1% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Pandora FMS’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 13 Coralogix reviews

3,588 Views
1,363 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

1,793 Views
430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Pandora FMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Pandora FMS compete in the infrastructure monitoring and logging category. Pandora FMS appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and cost-effective pricing model, which users find more aligned with their budgetary constraints.

Features: Coralogix offers a robust set of logging features, including powerful pattern recognition and anomaly detection, essential for proactive issue resolution. It is known for its scalability and diverse integration options that suit various business needs. Pandora FMS is versatile, allowing monitoring of logs, networks, and servers, and it offers highly customizable dashboards and comprehensive reports that enhance its flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users have identified a need for better documentation to aid in understanding its complex advanced features during setup. Additionally, users seek enhancements in making its UI more intuitive for smoother operations. Pandora FMS faces challenges with its initial configuration, which users find daunting. An improvement in reducing its learning curve and offering a more intuitive setup process are areas noted for development to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix provides a user-friendly deployment process with efficient cloud integration, which users favor for its simplicity and speed. Its customer service is widely regarded as responsive and supportive. Pandora FMS, while offering reliable customer support as well, may require more upfront configuration time, posing challenges for newcomers, though its customer service helps mitigate these complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is viewed favorably for its competitive pricing and considerable ROI, attributed to its efficient log management capabilities that help reduce issue resolution times. Pandora FMS is considered more cost-effective for small to medium businesses, offering a wealth of monitoring features that justify its pricing. Its pricing model is seen as particularly budget-friendly, providing substantial feature breadth that aligns well with user financial constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), API Management (15th), Streaming Analytics (15th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st), AI Observability (18th)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Log Management

63rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (78th), Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Cloud Monitoring Software (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Coralogix	1.1%
Pandora FMS	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Naveenkumar Lakshman

Presales Engineer at Crayon AS

Centralized monitoring has improved real-time issue tracking and reduced root cause analysis time

One of the best features that Coralogix offers is that it is integration friendly. I can seamlessly work with different cloud providers including AWS, Azure, and GCP. I can monitor Kubernetes or Docker platforms as well, and I can integrate with the DevOps chain including Jenkins and all infrastructure code, Terraform, or Ansible. Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool. I have the interface where I can use the drag-and-drop feature, and I can create different types of charts. Mainly, I have the line charts and time series ones that I generally use in many use cases, gauges, tables, pie charts, or markdown widgets. These are the ones generically available, and I can switch between the visualization types. I am getting the underlying query in that and can import and export dashboards built upon the JSON format. I can have my own APIs integrated with my dashboards as well, such as with Terraform, which is useful for scaling across my environments. Regarding root cause analysis, mainly what I can do is correlate across all of the layers because the main logs that I work on are storage-related, including CIFS, NFS, SAN traffic, and the metrics including storage, throughput, or VM resource usage. Being able to view logs, metrics, or traces available, I get all of these in one place, and I can do root cause analysis much quicker.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coralogix has positively impacted my organization by providing a centralized console to monitor the dashboard, giving me rich flexibility to see different sorts of data that is spread across the logs, metrics, or traces, which are the typical pillars of the observability tool."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"In my experience, the best feature Coralogix offers is that the dashboard is pretty good."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"It allows me to quickly see the status of all of my printers, switches, computers, and virtual machines to determine if any system has fallen."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"In terms of documentation, I think there can be more user-friendly documentation that stresses more on day-to-day issues."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

More Coralogix cons

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"An update to the Android app would be appreciated."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems."

"We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution."

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

To monitor and manage costs associated with Coralogix, I analyze my trend, looking at how the data is being ingested. Generally, it is charged based on what we store, and therefore there are certai...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

I think Coralogix can be improved with flexible dashboards. Creating specific views, such as saving a dev environment as a separate view rather than adding filters every time, would be great.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 13% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

January 2026

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

January 2026

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

December 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.