Coralogix vs Pandora FMS comparison

Coralogix and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.2, while Pandora FMS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Coralogix holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Pandora FMS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,603 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

1,376 Views
289 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Pandora FMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Pandora FMS compete in the infrastructure monitoring and logging category. Pandora FMS appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and cost-effective pricing model, which users find more aligned with their budgetary constraints.

Features: Coralogix offers a robust set of logging features, including powerful pattern recognition and anomaly detection, essential for proactive issue resolution. It is known for its scalability and diverse integration options that suit various business needs. Pandora FMS is versatile, allowing monitoring of logs, networks, and servers, and it offers highly customizable dashboards and comprehensive reports that enhance its flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users have identified a need for better documentation to aid in understanding its complex advanced features during setup. Additionally, users seek enhancements in making its UI more intuitive for smoother operations. Pandora FMS faces challenges with its initial configuration, which users find daunting. An improvement in reducing its learning curve and offering a more intuitive setup process are areas noted for development to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix provides a user-friendly deployment process with efficient cloud integration, which users favor for its simplicity and speed. Its customer service is widely regarded as responsive and supportive. Pandora FMS, while offering reliable customer support as well, may require more upfront configuration time, posing challenges for newcomers, though its customer service helps mitigate these complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is viewed favorably for its competitive pricing and considerable ROI, attributed to its efficient log management capabilities that help reduce issue resolution times. Pandora FMS is considered more cost-effective for small to medium businesses, offering a wealth of monitoring features that justify its pricing. Its pricing model is seen as particularly budget-friendly, providing substantial feature breadth that aligns well with user financial constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (22nd), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (13th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Log Management

34th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (46th), Server Monitoring (18th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (44th), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

More Coralogix pros

"The solution is so lightweight that with only 4GB of ram, it allows keeping track of up to two hundred agents from a single console."

"You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing."

"It provides us with proactive monitoring and is very easy to configure and maintain."

"This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."

"The network monitoring and configuration within this solution is very good."

"The administration of the console is very easy. I like that Pandora FMS is interactive and easy to manage."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"The customizable dashboards haven't really helped with my company's efficiency at all, and I think there's room for improvement."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

More Coralogix cons

"We would like to see improvement in the mainframe integration that this solution is capable of."

"In the future, we may have double the number of devices, and we do not want to have any issues with performance in the data display."

"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything."

"I would like for the solution to be faster and have a better tolerance between parallel servers for Pandora and Pest Control."

"I think some improvements to the Android app would be good."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 25% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 21% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 14% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmk vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

August 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

August 2025

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

July 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.