Coralogix vs Pandora FMS comparison

Coralogix and Pandora FMS are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0, while Pandora FMS is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0. Coralogix holds a 0.7% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Pandora FMS’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pandora FMS users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 9 Coralogix reviews

1,068 Views
831 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Pandora FMS

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

244 Views
184 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Pandora FMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Pandora FMS compete in the infrastructure monitoring and logging category. Pandora FMS appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities and cost-effective pricing model, which users find more aligned with their budgetary constraints.

Features: Coralogix offers a robust set of logging features, including powerful pattern recognition and anomaly detection, essential for proactive issue resolution. It is known for its scalability and diverse integration options that suit various business needs. Pandora FMS is versatile, allowing monitoring of logs, networks, and servers, and it offers highly customizable dashboards and comprehensive reports that enhance its flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users have identified a need for better documentation to aid in understanding its complex advanced features during setup. Additionally, users seek enhancements in making its UI more intuitive for smoother operations. Pandora FMS faces challenges with its initial configuration, which users find daunting. An improvement in reducing its learning curve and offering a more intuitive setup process are areas noted for development to enhance user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix provides a user-friendly deployment process with efficient cloud integration, which users favor for its simplicity and speed. Its customer service is widely regarded as responsive and supportive. Pandora FMS, while offering reliable customer support as well, may require more upfront configuration time, posing challenges for newcomers, though its customer service helps mitigate these complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is viewed favorably for its competitive pricing and considerable ROI, attributed to its efficient log management capabilities that help reduce issue resolution times. Pandora FMS is considered more cost-effective for small to medium businesses, offering a wealth of monitoring features that justify its pricing. Its pricing model is seen as particularly budget-friendly, providing substantial feature breadth that aligns well with user financial constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (31st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (41st), API Management (30th), Streaming Analytics (19th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Log Management

40th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (41st), Server Monitoring (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (40th), Cloud Monitoring Software (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Gabriel Glusgold

Asociado/ at Infraestructura Informática

Personalized metrics; simplicity of data

My primary use case for Pandora is monitoring This solution has helped us improve our organization by allowing us to create a lot of metrics on several platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. We then use these Pandora metrics to create an interface. We then pass the interface off to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

More Coralogix pros

"The administration of the console is very easy. I like that Pandora FMS is interactive and easy to manage."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"You can configure several types of architecture for high availability or load balancing."

"It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. There is a long list of different ones from Nagios. You can just use them, and within seconds, you get yourself a check that is monitoring whatever you need. It is really flexible. I guess that's why they call it Pandora Flexible Monitoring System (FMS). It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. Our network guy just recently asked about a particular protocol to monitor the bandwidth on the network, which is not a common protocol. When I looked it up, and I found that they cover it. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

"I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly."

"Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data."

"The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

"The monitoring system within this solution is very good. It is easy to use and navigate, and makes issue alarms easily viewable."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

More Coralogix cons

"Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios."

"Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas."

"I sincerely believe that Pandora needs new ideas for functionality closer to advanced device security monitoring."

"This solution requires proper training to get 100% out of it."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive."

"It would be helpful to include the generation of reports for times that the network was out of service."

"An update to the Android app would be appreciated."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"You have to pay for the number of agents and models that you are monitoring. I would rate the cost at three with one being the most expensive and five being the cheapest."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Media Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

We need to reduce the number of logs generated by our system, which are substantial. We require some form of grouping or categorization of logs to identify them better. Additionally, we find that t...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 31% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 32% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 22% of the time

LibreNMS vs Pandora FMS

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs Pandora FMS

Compared 7% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

May 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Pandora FMS

April 2025

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

Pandora FMS Features

Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application Monitoring (APM)
IoT monitoring
Log collection
Inventory
Issue management / ITSM
Mainframe monitoring
Network monitoring
Remote control
Synthetic monitoring
Service oriented monitoring
Server monitoring
User experience monitoring
Virtualization & cloud

Pandora FMS Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.

Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance.

Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time.

Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time.

Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible.

SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

Pandora FMS

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

April 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Pandora FMS report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.