

vCenter Orchestrator and Control-M compete in the enterprise orchestration and automation market. Control-M often has the upper hand in terms of scheduling capabilities and third-party integrations, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is stronger in VMware ecosystem integration and VM management.
Features: vCenter Orchestrator is known for its robustness in hardware abstraction, portability of VMs, and scalability within the VMware environment. Control-M is prized for its comprehensive scheduling capabilities, extensive workflow automation, and robust integrations with third-party applications like SAP and Informatica. It also offers a strong self-service portal, advantageous for end users and administrators.
Room for Improvement: vCenter Orchestrator faces criticism for high licensing costs and complicated integration with non-VMware products. Usability improvements are suggested for its user interface. Issues such as managing multi-site data replication are also present. Control-M's drawbacks include a high cost and complex reporting modules. Users see potential improvements in the REST API and file transfer modules. Enhanced cloud services integration is requested, like with AWS.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: vCenter Orchestrator offers stable deployment models, but Control-M provides greater flexibility with hybrid and public cloud options. vCenter Orchestrator generally receives positive customer service reviews despite some support delays. Control-M's support varies, with some users noting effective issue resolution and others highlighting consistency challenges.
Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator is expensive, especially with its complex licensing, making it more cost-effective for larger deployments but challenging for small to medium businesses. Control-M also offers premium pricing with its task-based licensing model, but users often find long-term benefits justify the upfront costs. Control-M provides varied pricing based on customer needs, catering to enterprise-level investments while possibly excluding smaller enterprises.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 3.7% |
| vCenter Orchestrator | 0.7% |
| Other | 95.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.