Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Conga CPQ vs Siebel comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga CPQ
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Siebel
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (6th), Order Management Hubs (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga CPQ is 3.4%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Siebel is 7.0%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

Use Conga CPQ?
Share your opinion
it_user495873 - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the assignment management and contact management features. I would like them to extend the possibility for functional segregation.
Extending the possibility for functional segregation would allow us to decentralize certain functions between different areas. In our organization, the administration of users (or executives who access the system) is done by an area. The management of executive skills is performed by another area, according to the current Siebel. These roles should not be independent.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
853,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Hover Automotive India, Smiles, Bouygues Telecom, Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, Lawn Tennis Association Boosts Tennis, Southwest Airlines