We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"Low code development."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"I find the data lineage features most valuable."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."
"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."
"The time it takes to get from deployment to production could be faster."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.