We performed a comparison between Cohesity DataProtect and Veeam Backup for Google Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cohesity has very simple reports to help you stay in the know of which servers are being backed up or not."
"The dashboard is very easy to use."
"It's stable."
"The most valuable aspect for me is that I don't have to deal with media in terms of tapes like our existing system does."
"Instant volume mount and the SpanFS filesystem itself, which has great dedupe and compression across all of our backups."
"The four independent node cluster architecture is redundant. It maintains data integrity and load balancing."
"Cohesity customer service is the best that I have ever used. They are extremely fast in responding to cases, fixed all issues, and answered every question in a very timely manner."
"No longer does it take several hours to backup a VM or troubleshoot a backup issue."
"Veeam Backup for Google Cloud’s most valuable feature is data backup and replication."
"Dealing with cloud solutions is simple and removes many headaches from troubleshooting and implementing the solution."
"You need to put the full name instead of a few letters while searching for backup. It should also improve customization."
"The one area where we would like to see additional improvements is with reporting. There are very granular reports from each grid. There are also some built-in reports within Helios (SAS Management Console) that offers basic reporting. However, for complex, large-enterprise environments, a more robust reporting engine that supports detailed audit reporting and enhanced ad hoc reports would be welcome."
"I think Cohesity could add more platform support. For example, they could improve integration with DB2 or make the integration S3 object storage a little tighter. Some of that stuff could use some work, but overall, it's a relatively comprehensive platform."
"Features I would like to see include a more visible data lifecycle monitoring tab, and an easier to read backup status dashboard."
"Cohesity DataProtect can improve in the area of databases. We have had some challenges with both Cohesity and Rubrik being able to effectively back up in a timely manner the SQL Oracle workloads."
"Quality testing of upgrades should be somewhat improved."
"We would like it to have more capabilities for different kinds of PaaS or SaaS services in the Azure cloud, such as Azure SQL or Azure Cosmos DB."
"The platform has certain limitations, mostly stemming from the restrictions imposed by the VMware API and some other factors. One area where there is room for improvement is the tracking of replicated copies, especially in the context of remote archive duplication."
"Some of the prerequisites for Veeam are challenging."
"There could be a feature to take a snapshot for version backup."
More Veeam Backup for Google Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cohesity DataProtect is ranked 7th in Cloud Backup with 67 reviews while Veeam Backup for Google Cloud is ranked 36th in Cloud Backup with 2 reviews. Cohesity DataProtect is rated 9.0, while Veeam Backup for Google Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cohesity DataProtect writes "Easy to use, offers good scalability and responsive support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup for Google Cloud writes "Comes with great cloud software and is affordable". Cohesity DataProtect is most compared with Rubrik, Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Veeam Backup for Google Cloud is most compared with . See our Cohesity DataProtect vs. Veeam Backup for Google Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
