Cohesity Data Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Cohesity and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Cohesity is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.7, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Cohesity holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cohesity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Cohesity Data Cloud

Read 8 Cohesity Data Cloud reviews

487 Views
261 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,359 Views
719 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cohesity Data Cloud

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Cohesity Data Cloud compete in the data protection market. Cohesity Data Cloud appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and user satisfaction.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is known for its reliability and comprehensive backup and recovery coverage. It also offers solid support services and competitive pricing. Cohesity Data Cloud provides innovative scalability, integrated data protection and management features, and stands out in user satisfaction due to its extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector users seek better performance and agility as the solution can be slow and challenging to configure. Enhancements in user experience are also desired. Cohesity Data Cloud users look for improved reporting capabilities, more granular data management control, and enhancements in user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector's deployment is seen as labor-intensive, with average customer service feedback. Cohesity Data Cloud receives favorable reviews for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is often viewed as more cost-effective with a quicker return on investment. Cohesity Data Cloud, despite its higher initial setup costs, is valued by users for delivering long-term ROI through its robust and versatile functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cohesity Data Cloud

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

39th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (35th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (6th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Cohesity Data Cloud is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

AmarpreetSingh

Technical Architect at Wipro Limited

Offers improved data protection and security with indirect ROI

The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions. Currently, Cohesity Cloud seems very costly compared to native backups. Although this is an emerging tool and there is room for growth, it needs to mature further. There is an AI feature, however, it is still in the development phase and requires substantial improvements.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to install and use."

"The clone feature is very nice. You can restore workloads onto Cohesity's storage, which is also nice to have when you don't have enough space to restore on the server."

"It's very regimented and fast. It does local backup, cloud backup, long-term coverage, and disaster recovery."

"I definitely recommend this tool to others due to its simplicity, security, features, and flexibility."

"I rate the Cohesity Data Cloud solution a ten out of ten. It's an easy-to-use product that provides substantial value and security."

"I find the most important feature to be data protection."

"We use Cohesity Helios primarily in our data management strategy for backup and reporting."

"Its big data and archive data features are the features that I have found most valuable. I can use it in a big virtual environment."

More Cohesity Data Cloud pros

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"Data Protector's granular recovery features make it easy for us to create and restore backups in an understandable and user-friendly manner. With granular recovery, any database or even just a database table can be restored at will."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"There is limited support for legacy systems, which is something that could be improved."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"It has never been touted as a tier-one storage platform, and that would be a benefit. They are currently working on solving that issue."

"The limitation that I see in Cohesity is that the minimum sized node is 36 terabytes, which is more than a small customer needs."

"The pricing of the Cloud is on the higher side, and it should be cost-effective enough to compete with native solutions."

"Their documentation portal is not up to date for newer releases and I strongly recommend Cohesity to increase their efforts on the documentation portal."

"In terms of functionality, Helios has been effective, but sometimes it doesn't show the exact cluster name for backups."

"The initial setup can be complex, depending on the environment."

More Cohesity Data Cloud cons

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"Micro Focus are improving Data Protector with every new version and since we began undergoing training with the latest version we have not faced any real challenges yet. However, their support does need to be improved, in my opinion. In certain critical cases that we've had, they did not provide a satisfactory level of support."

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."

"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."

"The online backups of Office 365 have room for improvement. This is now available for the Exchange Online part of Office 365, but we're still waiting for SharePoint Online, Teams, etc. We know that it's coming, but it takes time."

"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."

"This solution is not scalable."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's priced properly for the market."

"Regarding pricing, it's very costly and I rate it a four."

"Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cohesity DataPlatform?

While Cohesity Data Cloud is more costly in the long term compared to physical tapes, it offers value by meeting compliance needs and providing protection against ransomware attacks. The pricing is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary drawback is the need to transfer large amounts of data to the cloud via an internet connection, requiring significant bandwidth. Reading data from the cloud can incur additional costs, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cohesity Imanis Data?

The primary use case for Cohesity Data Cloud is to offer an additional layer of protection for backup data, which I can restore if needed. It is a managed service that allows me to set up and confi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Commvault Cloud vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Cohesity Data Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

More Cohesity Data Cloud Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 53% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud

June 2025

Download Cohesity Data Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

Imanis Data, DataPlatform, Cohesity Helios

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Consolidate your backups, file shares, object stores and data for dev/test and analytics on a web-scale data management platform.

Cohesity

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Navis, 1st Security Bank, Brown University, WestLotto

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Free Report: Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cohesity Data Cloud vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.