CodeSonar vs ReShaper comparison

CodeSecure and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. CodeSecure is ranked #10, while JetBrains is ranked #6. CodeSecure holds a 3.3% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,581 Views
490 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ReShaper

Read 2 ReShaper reviews

562 Views
562 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

ReShaper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CodeSonar and ReShaper are competing in the domain of code quality and productivity tools. CodeSonar appears to have the upper hand in environments requiring safety-critical application analysis, whereas ReShaper leads in integration and development efficiency.

Features: CodeSonar is known for its advanced static analysis, deep code inspection, and complex defect identification, particularly in safety-critical applications. ReShaper stands out for its real-time code analysis, superior refactoring capabilities, and smooth integration with popular IDEs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CodeSonar's deployment can be more complex due to its detailed customization needs and might need specialized support. ReShaper offers easier deployment with seamless IDE integration, making the setup more straightforward, and its customer service is known for responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: CodeSonar typically demands a higher initial investment, with substantial ROI expected in environments where safety and defect analysis are crucial. ReShaper offers a competitive pricing structure, providing quick ROI in faster-paced development settings where efficiency is prioritized.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (31st)

ReShaper

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.4%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

reviewer937347

Sr. Test Engineering Manager - Embedded Linux SW / RF at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Beneficial real-time scanning, reliable, and overall good processing

ReShaper is a static code analysis tool The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system. ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"It has been able to scale."

"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."

Cons

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"It was expensive."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

11%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar

Compared 50% of the time

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 24% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper

Compared 100% of the time

More ReShaper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

August 2025

Download ReShaper product report

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

ReSharper extends Visual Studio with over 2200 on-the-fly code inspections for C#, VB.NET, ASP.NET, JavaScript, TypeScript and other technologies. For most inspections, ReSharper provides quick-fixes (light bulbs) to improve the code.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

July 2025

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. ReShaper report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.