CodeSonar vs ReShaper comparison

CodeSecure and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. CodeSecure is ranked #10, while JetBrains is ranked #13. CodeSecure holds a 3.8% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

3,182 Views
732 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

ReShaper

Read 2 ReShaper reviews

510 Views
510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

ReShaper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CodeSonar and ReShaper are competing in the domain of code quality and productivity tools. CodeSonar appears to have the upper hand in environments requiring safety-critical application analysis, whereas ReShaper leads in integration and development efficiency.

Features: CodeSonar is known for its advanced static analysis, deep code inspection, and complex defect identification, particularly in safety-critical applications. ReShaper stands out for its real-time code analysis, superior refactoring capabilities, and smooth integration with popular IDEs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CodeSonar's deployment can be more complex due to its detailed customization needs and might need specialized support. ReShaper offers easier deployment with seamless IDE integration, making the setup more straightforward, and its customer service is known for responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: CodeSonar typically demands a higher initial investment, with substantial ROI expected in environments where safety and defect analysis are crucial. ReShaper offers a competitive pricing structure, providing quick ROI in faster-paced development settings where efficiency is prioritized.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (30th)

ReShaper

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 3.8%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CodeSonar	3.8%
ReShaper	2.4%
Other	93.8%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

reviewer937347

Sr. Test Engineering Manager - Embedded Linux SW / RF at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Beneficial real-time scanning, reliable, and overall good processing

ReShaper is a static code analysis tool The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system. ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"I would suggest trying out automated tools along with CodeSonar on your project, and you will find out that CodeSonar reports many more defects compared to other static analysis tools, so this is a very important tool."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"The solution is very stable and we have used it for a long time with no issues."

More CodeSonar pros

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."

"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."

"Once you get used to working with the ReShaper, you can't get enough of it."

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time, and ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, with a decent system."

Cons

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"The MISRA guidelines were not appropriately reported and there were some flags or errors."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"It was difficult for us to apply a rule, especially to a part of the code, and not apply it to the rest of the code."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

More CodeSonar cons

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU."

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 17% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 13% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Jscrambler vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper

Compared 35% of the time

Veracode vs ReShaper

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs ReShaper

Compared 23% of the time

Klocwork vs ReShaper

Compared 13% of the time

More ReShaper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

May 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

April 2026

Download ReShaper product report

Overview

CodeSonar offers a potent tool for static code analysis, adept in detecting runtime errors and security vulnerabilities, with a fast deployment process and scalable capabilities. Its quick analysis and efficient web interface provide a strong basis for code quality validation.

CodeSonar specializes in identifying runtime errors, dead code, and security threats while providing features like code surfing and browsing. It offers a highly efficient web interface, though users find initial setup complex and highlight the need for better static analysis, broader language support beyond C and C++, and an improved licensing model. Despite these challenges, its integration with Jenkins and technical guidance support makes it a reliable choice for teams in defense and software quality assessment. Deployment is quick and easy, yet initial costs are a common concern among users.

What are the key features of CodeSonar?

Quick Analysis: Delivers fast runtime error detection and reporting.
GUI Interface: Offers a user-friendly experience for code browsing.
Scalability: Efficiently deploys across various environments.
Security and Code Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities and potential bugs.
Effective Configuration: Simplified log and analysis configuration.

What benefits can be seen in user reviews?

Detection of Code Vulnerabilities: Enhances security with robust threat detection.
Process Integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools such as Jenkins.
Scalable Deployment: Quickly adaptable in expanding environments.
GUI Usability: Highly efficient for technical teams to navigate.

CodeSonar is primarily implemented in industries like defense and companies prioritizing code quality. Teams utilize its static code analysis and threat detection capabilities, integrating with Jenkins for continuous integration workflows. Security checks post-builds and technical support are common, aiding in effective defect management.

CodeSecure

ReShaper is designed to streamline code refactoring, optimize workflows, and enhance productivity for developers. It provides a suite of integrated tools that facilitate seamless code editing and comprehension.

ReShaper caters to development teams seeking efficient code management. Its robust features support refactoring, navigation, and code analysis. Built to enhance efficiency, ReShaper supports multiple programming languages, offering vital solutions tailored for modern development environments. Its tools reduce manual effort, fostering streamlined coding practices and improved software quality. Suitable for both small teams and large enterprises, ReShaper adapts to different project needs.

What are the key features of ReShaper?

Code Analysis: Identifies issues and suggests improvements.
Refactoring: Streamlines code restructuring to uphold quality.
Navigation: Quick access to code elements improves efficiency.
Code Editing: Offers comprehensive coding assistance.
Integration: Seamless support with popular IDEs enhances user experience.

What are the benefits or ROI from using ReShaper?

Improved Code Quality: Ensures high standards and mitigates errors.
Increased Productivity: Reduces development time through automated processes.
Efficient Workflow: Enhances team collaboration with integrated tools.
Cost-Effective: Reduces manual effort, bringing value to development initiatives.

In industries like software development and technology, ReShaper is used to elevate coding standards and optimize project timelines. Its implementation in sectors demanding high-quality coding results in reduced errors and improved software delivery times, contributing to a more reliable and efficient development process.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. ReShaper

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. ReShaper report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.