CodeSonar vs GitHub comparison

CodeSecure and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #31, while GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0. CodeSecure holds a 1.5% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,581 Views
1,781 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
2,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and CodeSonar are prominent in the software development tools category, each catering to different needs. GitHub tends to lead in terms of collaboration and integration, while CodeSonar focuses on code robustness and security.

Features: GitHub is known for its version control, collaboration features, and integration with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, which benefit code management and teamwork. CodeSonar specializes in identifying code defects and vulnerabilities, ensuring robust security for sensitive software projects. GitHub supports seamless project execution with tools like pull requests and branching, whereas CodeSonar offers comprehensive code analysis and safety checks.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance security features, conflict resolution, and beginner-friendly documentation, as well as address scaling challenges and better integrate with project management tools. CodeSonar may benefit from supporting more programming languages and improving its static analysis capabilities. Additionally, more flexible licensing and updated coding rules could make CodeSonar more attractive.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers versatile deployment options across public, private, and hybrid clouds, with strong community backing despite inconsistent official support. CodeSonar is mostly deployed on-premises, offering less flexibility. Both products receive mixed reviews on customer support, with GitHub particularly reliant on its community.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub's open-source and free versions provide a cost-effective solution, offering significant ROI via time savings. However, licensing complexities can arise. In contrast, CodeSonar is costly, with expenses linked to license needs and project scale, making it less accessible for smaller projects. Despite its premium pricing, CodeSonar remains valued for its reliability in code analysis, though immediate savings are less evident compared to GitHub.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. GitHub

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (10th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.5%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"It has been able to scale."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."

"Our code is secure."

"The solution is scalable."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"It was expensive."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

11%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar

Compared 50% of the time

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 24% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. GitHub

July 2025

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.