CodeSonar vs GitHub comparison

CodeSecure and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. CodeSecure is ranked #28, while GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. CodeSecure holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,608 Views
1,800 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and CodeSonar both offer solutions in the code management and analysis space, yet they cater to different user needs. GitHub, with its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, seems to have the upper hand for broader software development and collaboration, while CodeSonar excels in specialized code analysis and security threat detection.

Features: GitHub offers advanced source code management, integration with various tools like GitHub Actions for automation, and robust security measures. It supports branching strategies and enhances collaboration through features like pull requests and version control. CodeSonar is specialized with precise detection of runtime errors and dead code, pinpointing security threats efficiently, and providing GUI interface for user-friendly operations.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users report challenges with integration in CI/CD contexts, and desire enhancements in user-friendliness for non-tech-savvy users. There's also a need for better project management and conflict resolution. CodeSonar could improve by supporting a wider range of programming languages beyond C and C++, and enhancing its static analysis capabilities. Users seek more flexible license models and better coding rules.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is frequently deployed as a Public Cloud service, making it accessible and flexible, alongside a large community for support, although official customer service can be lacking. CodeSonar is typically used in On-premises environments, offering controlled deployment but with generally satisfactory technical support. Both platforms are scalable, with GitHub benefiting from its community's support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides cost-effective solutions with free tiers meeting many user needs and offers straightforward licensing models. Issues with managing user licenses exist, but overall, it provides significant ROI through efficient code management. CodeSonar, seen as a pricier option, mandates multiple licenses for extensive projects but offers high reliability and value for niche code analysis applications, yielding a good ROI for targeted use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. GitHub

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Code Analysis (11th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.1%
CodeSonar	1.2%
Other	97.7%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"It has been able to scale."

"Applying GitHub Actions saves so much time for the team because it automates the developer's work to the server."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"The product has a very user-friendly interface and user-friendly security."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"It was expensive."

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice."

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

University

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CodeSonar

Compared 34% of the time

Coverity Static vs CodeSonar

Compared 22% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Helix QAC vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs CodeSonar

Compared 4% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. GitHub

December 2025

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.