Coder vs Postman Enterprise comparison

Coder and Postman are both solutions in the AI Software Development category. Coder is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while Postman is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8. Coder holds a 0.5% mindshare in ASD, compared to Postman’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Coder users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Postman users who would recommend it.

Coder

Read 2 Coder reviews

1,401 Views
981 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Postman Enterprise

Read 71 Postman Enterprise reviews

7,167 Views
1,147 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Coder

Postman Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coder and Postman Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Windsurf, Anthropic, Pega and others in AI Software Development.

To learn more, read our detailed AI Software Development Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AI Software Development

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coder

Ranking in AI Software Development

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IDE (12th)

Postman Enterprise

Ranking in AI Software Development

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (4th), API Monitoring Software (1st), API Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AI Software Development category, the mindshare of Coder is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Postman Enterprise is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI Software Development Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Postman Enterprise	0.4%
Coder	0.5%
Other	99.1%

AI Software Development

Featured Reviews

Joseph Kaiser

Staff Infrastructure Engineer at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

Centralized research workspace has streamlined GPU access and simplified remote collaboration

The best features Coder offers include easy integration into a remote environment that is accessible from everywhere, VS Code integrations, and AI integrations. The AI integrations I mentioned include various ways people access AI, such as using Cursor and Claude with various models. We have fairly extensive licensing as we are a biologics company, so the integration with Anthropic's Life Sciences has been wonderful as well as the integration with cloud workflow. Coder has positively impacted my organization by providing a central place for people to run their research and enabling us as administrators to focus on one aspect of researcher interactions with our clusters, so we do not have to provide much education or options for integrating their workflows into our clusters.

Read full review

RituRaj

SDE 2 at Virtusa

Centralized collaboration has transformed API testing and documentation across multiple teams

In terms of improvement, the UI can sometimes feel heavy for larger collections in the workspaces. Additionally, performance may slow down with complex API projects, and pricing can be expensive for smaller teams. However, it is quite suitable for bigger teams. Other areas for improvement include better reporting and analytics dashboards, and more advanced native test environment features could enhance workflow, with smoother offline support and sync handling. Additionally, better performance for very large collections would be helpful, along with more intuitive navigation for enterprise-scale workspaces, stronger reporting analytics, easier management of permissions across large teams, and more flexible automation and testing report options would be beneficial. Small usability and performance improvements would make Postman Enterprise even more efficient for larger organizations. Postman Enterprise needs better performance optimization for large enterprises, more detailed analytics user reporting, improved API governance and audit visibility, simpler permissions and access control management, faster sync and loading times for larger collections, and more advanced built-in testing and reporting capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coder is very stable and incredibly reliable."

"Coder is a strong solution for developers who want a consistent cloud-based and repeatable development environment."

"This product deserves an eight out of ten."

"I rate Postman as a ten out of ten."

"The solution has a great user interface and collection of features."

"The API testing features are valuable."

"When it comes to anything API related, I would recommend this solution."

"It is a very stable solution."

"Postman is better than SoapUI when it comes to usability."

"Postman offers great features, so I get a better opportunity to run bulk tasks through single command lines and single APIs, and we have an internal Postman AI tool, which helps improvise the code and analyze the quality if you find any errors."

Cons

"Coder can be improved by making setup easier for users who are not very experienced with infrastructure or Terraform style."

"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing."

"Integration should be improved with our continuation system because we use Azure DevOps separately."

"I would like to have a code snippet where I can write a code and for the responses of the endpoints to be validated using my custom business conditions."

"When you try to code something and put it in the code, it's not useful."

"I have not seen much use of Postman Enterprise for API governance capabilities in maintaining compliance and consistency within my organization up until now."

"I have recently noticed that, for some reason, I am not able to import collections in JSON. It is weird because I was able to do it before. When you create a new collection and documentation, in tests, you usually have to click Save. If you don't click Save, your collections don't sync with other devices, which is something I don't like. It is not clear for the users in a shared workspace, and I usually forget to click Save and end up losing all the collections that I created. I create a lot of routes, and clicking Save all the time isn't efficient. Instead of clicking Save all the time, there should be an option to save everything in one go."

"There is no support for the testing of the SOAP APIs."

"Could be more user friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This solution offers a free version."

"We are using its free version."

"We are currently using the free version, but we have plans to buy a license."

"I use the tool's free version."

"Its price is moderate as compared to other competitors. The version that we are using is not open source, so it is not free."

"This is an open source solution."

"I rate the product's price a nine or ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive. Postman is an expensive tool for Turkey."

"I am using the free option."

More Postman Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Software Development solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Construction Company

21%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Coder?

Coder can be improved by making setup easier for users who are not very experienced with infrastructure or Terraform style. The first setup can require technical knowledge. Better guided setup with...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Coder?

My main use case for Coder is creating consistent remote development environments. I use it to prepare a workspace with tools like Git, Docker, Python, and Node.js, as well as automation testing. I...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Coder?

My advice is to invest time in building good workspace templates from the beginning. The real value of Coder comes when your environments are standardized and repeatable. I would also recommend mon...

See all answers

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Postman?

Almost 30% of our time has been saved when it comes to complete regression testing of one feature. That is the rough estimate I can provide.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Postman?

One area for improvement is that sometimes performance is slightly slow when we are handling large collections. Also, we need better integrations with CI/CD tools so that automation would be smooth...

See all answers

Comparisons

JetBrains IDEs vs Coder

Compared 35% of the time

Cursor vs Coder

Compared 33% of the time

AWS Cloud9 vs Coder

Compared 18% of the time

Replit vs Coder

Compared 8% of the time

Codespaces vs Coder

Compared 6% of the time

More Coder Competitors

ReadyAPI Test vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Apigee vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Postman Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IDE

July 2026

Download Coder product report

Buyer's Guide

Postman Enterprise

August 2026

Download Postman Enterprise product report

Overview

Coder is a robust platform designed to streamline development processes by providing secure, scalable, and efficient coding environments for software professionals.

Designed for developers requiring remote and collaborative coding capabilities, Coder's platform supports increased productivity and reduced setup times through its cloud-centric approach. By providing isolated coding environments, it ensures projects remain secure and compliant. Developers benefit from a scalable resource allocation, accelerating large-scale application development with efficiency. Organizations can seamlessly integrate Coder with existing workflows, enabling teams to leverage optimized tools without compromising security.

What are the key features of Coder?

Cloud Workspaces: Provides instant access to customized, remote coding environments.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with major development tools and cloud services.
Enhanced Security: Offers isolated environments to maintain the integrity of projects.
Scalable Infrastructure: Adjusts resources according to project demands.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Productivity: Users often notice quicker setup and reduced downtime.
Cost Efficiency: Reviews highlight lower infrastructure management costs.
Flexibility: Efficiency in adapting to project-specific needs.
Secure Collaboration: Allows for safe and compliant team collaboration.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Coder is implemented to ensure data integrity while enabling remote work. Technology firms employ Coder to enhance workflow integration and boost project turnaround, making it ideal for sectors prioritizing speed and security.

Coder

Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.

Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.

What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and usage across teams.
Automation Capabilities: Speeds up testing processes.
Integration Support: Connects with tools like Jenkins and Newman.
Scripting and Version Control: Enhances collaboration.
Testing Flexibility: Supports REST and SOAP API testing.

What benefits can users expect from Postman Enterprise?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines API testing processes.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared environments.
Better Testing Accuracy: Validates requests and responses thoroughly.

In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.

Postman

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

PayPal, Shopify, Microsoft, Adobe, Atlassian, Twitter, BestBuy, Coursera

Buyer's Guide

AI Software Development

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Windsurf, Anthropic, Pega and others in AI Software Development. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best AI Software Development vendors.

We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.