CMW Tracker and SS&C Blue Prism are competing products in the field of process automation. CMW Tracker scores higher in customer satisfaction, particularly with support and pricing, while SS&C Blue Prism is preferred for its advanced features and perceived value.
Features: CMW Tracker excels in flexible workflow management, offering customizable options and transparent workflows. It includes social collaboration tools that enhance team efficiency. SS&C Blue Prism is known for its powerful automation capabilities, seamless integration with various systems, and user-friendly process flow, making it ideal for large-scale automation projects.
Room for Improvement: CMW Tracker could benefit from enhancing its advanced automation capabilities and integration support to compete better against market leaders. Additionally, more extensive training resources could help users maximize its potential. SS&C Blue Prism's pricing could be reconsidered to become more accessible for smaller enterprises. More straightforward deployment processes and reducing complexity could enhance the user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CMW Tracker is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive support team, allowing for a quick setup. SS&C Blue Prism involves a more complex deployment process but offers comprehensive training resources that users find valuable for understanding its detailed functionalities and scale.
Pricing and ROI: CMW Tracker offers an attractive pricing model with low initial setup costs, providing a quick return on investment. SS&C Blue Prism, while more expensive, delivers a potent long-term ROI, particularly for businesses focused on large-scale automation, justifying its higher investment through its advanced features and scalability.
It saved a lot of money, with 50 to 60% of our cost saved, especially through automation.
I have more time to work on meaningful tasks since automation has been very helpful in automating repetitive and time-consuming tasks.
They provide very detailed responses that enable us to handle any issues effectively.
The response times were slow to turn around.
It is scalable from the solution perspective.
I found it to be high on stability, and I would rate it at nine.
The solution is generally stable, though we have faced issues with increased transaction loads causing latency and occasional hang-ups.
It was not developed in a consumption-based manner, however, rather in a fixed-price licensing model that did not account for volumes.
The pricing model was not modern, as it wasn't designed on a consumption basis or as a service basis.
The licensing cost can be a bit expensive compared to its competitors.
Overall, my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that for large organizations and medium organizations, it is very cost-effective.
The control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, is to be the most useful.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SS&C Blue Prism | 1.3% |
| CMW Tracker | 1.4% |
| Other | 97.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.
SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.
What are the key features?
What ROI should users expect?
SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
