CloverETL vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Javlin and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #57, while WSO2 is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Javlin holds a 0.8% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

1,146 Views
699 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

2,594 Views
1,349 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

CloverETL

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

In the data integration landscape, CloverETL and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offer distinct advantages. CloverETL typically holds the upper hand due to its powerful transformation capabilities, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers value with its extensive integration features and cost-effectiveness.

Features: CloverETL provides flexible transformation capabilities, support for complex scenarios, and robust transformation tools. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator focuses on integration across diverse systems, support for a range of protocols, and comprehensive integration features appealing to organizations needing wide connectivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator facilitates cloud-centric deployments, ensuring quick integration with cloud setups and offers reliable customer service with comprehensive documentation. CloverETL is noted for its straightforward on-premises deployment and effective guidance through various support channels.

Pricing and ROI: CloverETL involves a moderate setup cost with a promising return on investment due to its powerful tools. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator attracts businesses with its cost-effective solutions, offering competitive pricing and a substantial value proposition for a broader range of integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

57th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (34th)

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	1.0%
CloverETL	0.8%
Other	98.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Familiar, intuitive GUI coming from a Java development background, in-depth, descriptive, and well-laid-out documentation, responsive support through forums directly from Clover staff, a wealth of customizable pre-defined components, descriptive logging for error messages, and ease of install with a light footprint make it very effective to use."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"We switched to CloverETL because of its flexibility to connect to various data sources and no dependence on native language and ease of use."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

"The stability is excellent."

"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"WSO2 Enterprise Integrator may cost you about twenty-five thousand dollars annually per year compared to IBM Cloud Pak, which would cost you around one million dollars."

"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."

"The connectors have been the most impactful features for handling integrations. I can use these connectors when I need specific connectivity with a third party, like a core banking system in BFSI. I don't need to do all the development. I take the specific connector, put in the IP address and password, and it takes care of everything."

"It's a consolidated product; it works and it does its job pretty well."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Needs easier automated failure recovery, more and more intuitive auto-generated or filled-in code for components, and easier or more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems."

"The micro integrator should be improved. There is room for enhancement considering alternative integration components."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

"The scalability is not strong. If you want to scale it you have to install multiple servers."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a low-cost solution."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

27%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 16% of the time

ViaSQL by Adaptigent vs CloverETL

Compared 12% of the time

SSIS vs CloverETL

Compared 11% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs CloverETL

Compared 10% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 9% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 6% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

March 2026

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2026

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

West

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

March 2026

Free Report: CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.