CloverETL vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

Javlin and WSO2 are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Javlin is ranked #61, while WSO2 is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Javlin holds a 0.5% mindshare in DI, compared to WSO2’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

556 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

1,766 Views
742 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

CloverETL

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

In the data integration landscape, CloverETL and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offer distinct advantages. CloverETL typically holds the upper hand due to its powerful transformation capabilities, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers value with its extensive integration features and cost-effectiveness.

Features: CloverETL provides flexible transformation capabilities, support for complex scenarios, and robust transformation tools. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator focuses on integration across diverse systems, support for a range of protocols, and comprehensive integration features appealing to organizations needing wide connectivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator facilitates cloud-centric deployments, ensuring quick integration with cloud setups and offers reliable customer service with comprehensive documentation. CloverETL is noted for its straightforward on-premises deployment and effective guidance through various support channels.

Pricing and ROI: CloverETL involves a moderate setup cost with a promising return on investment due to its powerful tools. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator attracts businesses with its cost-effective solutions, offering competitive pricing and a substantial value proposition for a broader range of integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Ranking in Data Integration

61st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Visualization (39th)

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Data Integration

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of CloverETL is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	0.8%
CloverETL	0.5%
Other	98.7%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Decreases the development timeframe and costs

The main issue with the product is pricing. It uses core-based pricing for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and API Manager. It would be best if you had APIM by default. It provides many connectors for easy integration with third-party systems. Often, customers decide to develop using open-source tools like Spring Boot if there aren't many connectors required to avoid increasing costs. They'll develop this way and then deploy using APIM, the bare minimum needed. It is mainly required for very complicated setups with many connectors. In the implementations I've seen, people often used open-source tools because there weren't many third-party systems involved—just their organization's own systems. From WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, I expect them to bring up more and more connectors in the future. That's the main expectation. Having more connectors in various areas will help us when discussing new requirements. I don't have any specific use case right now, so I can't name a particular connector. But, as new technologies emerge, the relevant connectors should be there for those. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator mainly helps with the integration part, which can be simplified only if you have relevant connectors for whatever you're doing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"The stability is excellent."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."

"The installation process is easy."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"The customization can be a bit difficult."

"You cannot include the validation of XPath."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 50% of the time

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 50% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

Oracle Service Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 11% of the time

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

September 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

West

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

September 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.