No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
2.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...
Ranking in Attack Surface Management (ASM)
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (8th), Vulnerability Management (25th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (5th), Mobile Threat Defense (5th), Patch Management (5th), Cloud Cost Management (19th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (8th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

Prabhudarshan Samal - PeerSpot reviewer
Infosec Analyst at Zoetis
Brand monitoring has strengthened dark web detection and enabled faster fraud takedowns
The best feature CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise offers is the Brand Reputation module. What makes the Brand Reputation module stand out is its accuracy and coverage. The deep dark web feeds and intelligence I received were accurate approximately eight out of ten times. I was able to take quick actions, and proactive measures were implemented to remediate risks. CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements. We have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements.
reviewer2882148 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally
In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I recommend this platform because it uses AI plus threat intelligence technology that identifies phishing leaks and impersonations, and if anything is going to happen, this tool provides early threat detection, which is beneficial for our company."
"CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise has positively impacted my organization through specific outcomes and improvements, as we have remediated our risks, addressed our internal risks and insider risks, and protected against data breaches, thus achieving significant improvements."
"I experience every day how the unified platform has really optimized IT and security operations processes since patch management automatically patches the vulnerabilities."
"This is an extremely robust product, very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate, and most of our customers just set it and forget it while it does all of the automatic patching month after month."
"A positive impact of using Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management on my organization is the ability to perform mass updates in the environment, as today we are able to update hundreds of thousands of computers at once."
"They have an excellent support team."
"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"The security features in Ivanti Neurons for MDM are very effective, which is why we have been distributing it for the past 15 years."
"Its features are very complete."
"MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution."
 

Cons

"I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation."
"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."
"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."
"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
"Ivanti Neurons for UEM could be improved by providing training on the dashboard, which could help users understand better how they can get more out of the platform."
"The biggest improvement I would like to see in Ivanti Neurons for UEM is a more intuitive interface with simpler navigation for common tasks."
"Regarding how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, the dashboard can be quite complex for first-time users and even small-scale organizations."
"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."
"The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."
"The solution is affordable."
"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Attack Surface Management (ASM) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it still needs improvement in alert accuracy, the vulnerability depth, and full SOC automation.
What is your primary use case for CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I used CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise, specifically the Brand Reputation Monitoring module, when working for IBM from January to April 2024. The company's threat intelligence platform was utilized for...
What advice do you have for others considering CloudSEK BeVigil Enterprise?
I think it will definitely improve as the technology is already evolving. From time to time as we are learning, the AI is getting stronger and stronger. The threat landscape keeps evolving. The bes...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing involves knowing that when deploying the project, we provide a cost for the tasks, which includes an assigned license. We deploy the license an...
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an ...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
Ivanti Neurons for UEM serves as our main solution for utilizing EPM for Endpoint Manager to manage endpoints, obtain inventory data, push software, and conduct patch analysis. We also use UE and E...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Frontier Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about TrendAI, CrowdStrike, Qualys and others in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.