CloudCheckr vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) comparison

Spot and Flexera are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Spot is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.0, while Flexera is ranked #34. Spot holds a 1.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Flexera’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Spot users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

465 Views
224 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

486 Views
230 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform and CloudCheckr compete in the cloud management space. Flexera CMP appears to have the upper hand with a wider array of functionalities, while CloudCheckr focuses on pricing efficiency.

Features: Flexera CMP offers detailed cost management, enhanced automation capabilities, and multi-cloud support, making it suitable for complex cloud environments. CloudCheckr provides cost visibility, security monitoring, and compliant governance, offering functionality focused on specific areas.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could improve by simplifying its deployment process, enhancing user interface intuitiveness, and expanding on security features. CloudCheckr may benefit from expanding its feature set, providing more robust integration options, and improving customer support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP requires significant initial setup time with strong customer support, suiting organizations ready for involved setup processes. CloudCheckr offers an easier deployment model for smaller teams, with less comprehensive support services.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP involves higher setup costs but offers long-term ROI through its comprehensive management capabilities. CloudCheckr offers competitive pricing with a faster ROI through direct cost management and simplified deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

29th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (10th), Managed Cloud Services (3rd)

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

Cons

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Transportation Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 10% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 22% of the time

Spot vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 13% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) optimizes cloud costs and resources while efficiently managing multi-cloud environments. Its features for monitoring and governance aid in compliance. Valued for integration capabilities and automation tools, Flexera CMP streamlines cloud operations.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) excels in multi-cloud management, cost optimization, and automation. Users appreciate its detailed analytics and reporting features that effectively track usage and costs. The platform's flexibility in integrating with different cloud environments allows seamless operations across various services, while its governance and policy enforcement are significant strengths. However, some users note the need for better integration with additional cloud providers, a high installation complexity, and that the support documentation lacks depth. Reporting features could be more comprehensive, and scalability issues exist in larger environments. Frequent updates can sometimes disrupt ongoing activities.

What are the Key Features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Enables management across different cloud services efficiently.
Cost Optimization: Provides tools to optimize and reduce cloud expenditure.
Automation Tools: Streamlines operations with powerful automation capabilities.
Detailed Analytics and Reporting: Offers insight into usage and costs with robust reporting.
Governance and Policy Enforcement: Maintains cloud usage compliance through strong policy enforcement.
Integration Capabilities: Integrates seamlessly with leading cloud providers for unified operations.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances cloud operations through efficient management and automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces spending with advanced cost optimization tools.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates governance and maintains compliance effortlessly.
Insightful Analytics: Provides detailed reports for better decision-making and tracking.
Seamless Integration: Supports multiple cloud environments for a cohesive cloud strategy.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform is utilized across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, to manage multi-cloud setups. Financial institutions leverage its cost optimization features to streamline expenses. Healthcare providers use its governance tools to ensure strict compliance with regulations. Technology companies benefit from its automation capabilities, allowing them to focus on innovation while Flexera CMP handles cloud infrastructure tasks.

Flexera

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.