Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudBolt vs Hyperglance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBolt
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
45th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (29th)
Hyperglance
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CloudBolt is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyperglance is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Hyperglance0.7%
CloudBolt1.3%
Other98.0%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

AdeolaEkunola - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at NIGERCUBES LTD
The solution offers reliable resource control but needs to improve its UI
Cloudbox is just an abstraction software. There is no need for scalability. It's quite a simple solution. You might only need to increase the resources you apply to the CloudBold deployment. If, for example, the number of users increases, you might have to check the recommendations from CloudBolt and act accordingly. We have over 100 internal users. Regarding the infrastructure it sits on, the solution sits on the private of the on-prem, a VMware infrastructure that stands across two sites, the DR and the main production. We have over 60 ESXi of Asterisk and about 500 or 1,000 virtual machines.
Sivasai sudhakar  - PeerSpot reviewer
Vp at Zensar Technologies
Overcoming complex deployment has improved cloud cost control and automated security checks
We have been using Hyperglance for quite a while now, but the features which I personally feel are my personal favorites are that it supports a multi-cloud environment. It can work over Azure, AWS, GCP, and Kubernetes APIs for management unification. Apart from that, it also provides good real-time visualization, interactive diagrams, and dependency mapping for all the resources, which is a great thing. If we are able to map the dependencies at the right time, we are able to identify any issues. It also helps us to automate the recommendations for cost savings, trend analysis, and anomaly detection, which is again a great thing. Codeless automations for fixing common issues and optimizing resources is again a great feature of Hyperglance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."
"The initial deployment was super easy."
"I find the self-service features valuable."
"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"
"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."
"Hyperglance has helped our team replace the piecemeal solution and tedious manual documentation we used to do, providing automation for compliance and cost optimization, proving to be a time saver and directly reducing cloud waste."
"Hyperglance has helped us to save on the cost of cloud through waste reduction, saving around 38% in cloud cost, improving work efficiency with real-time compliance checks by around 78% time saving, and enhancing visibility while automating the fixing of costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our ROI on system failures and technology breaches."
"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."
"Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] provided a visual representation of our cloud resources and usage, showing which EC2 instances were underutilized or overprovisioned, and recommended resizing the instances based on actual usage, which led to a reduction of 30% to 35% in cloud spending."
"Hyperglance has helped us save on cost, improve efficiency, and reduce manual work while enabling real-time compliance checks with very good features."
"Hyperglance has helped us to save on the cost of cloud through waste reduction, saving around 38% in cloud cost, improving work efficiency with real-time compliance checks by around 78% time saving, and enhancing visibility while automating the fixing of costly misconfigurations and security breaches, which further boosted our ROI on system failures and technology breaches."
 

Cons

"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."
"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."
"The management of SaaS must be improved."
"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."
"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."
"The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments."
"The current limitations in Hyperglance: Up to 5000 Resources [Pay as you go] are heavily focused on cloud environments and may not offer the same visibility in hybrid infrastructure."
"The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved."
"The cost for small businesses is the main concern."
"The initial deployment of Hyperglance requires configuration, network access, and permission for cloud APIs, which can be complex for large, multi-account environments."
"The learning curve can be a challenge for new users, which is something that can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The system is cheaper if a customer has fewer servers since you pay by the node."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because the solution is expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
8%
Insurance Company
62%
Transportation Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyperglance?
The metering and billing experience with Hyperglance has been excellent, providing a robust pay-as-you-go model where we pay only for the services we require, allowing us flexibility based on our n...
What needs improvement with Hyperglance?
Hyperglance is a very good solution. However, it caters primarily to mid and large-sized businesses, and the cost is a bit high for small-sized businesses, which can be a concern. Introducing a ver...
What is your primary use case for Hyperglance?
Hyperglance is known for its excellent visual interactive dashboards that provide a real-time overview of multi-cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes, which makes it signifi...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

WM, CyWest, Panic, Camden, University of Maryland, Xerox, Neustar, Medidata, Continu, Aruba Networks, Neuberger Berman, Peak6, EverBank, Ascensus, Hosting Edge
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBolt vs. Hyperglance and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.