We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The stability of the solution is perfect."
"Just creating that gateway to the storefront for Citrix is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."
"What I find most valuable about this solution, is that it runs seamlessly."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it is secure."
"The solution is scalable and can go from a very small deployment to handling 10,000 transactions a second."
"The solution is very stable. If I were to rate it out of ten, I would give stability a nine."
"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"Safe-T is very good for users because it has plug-in for Outlook."
"It's easy to use over the web. A user who is not in the office can use it and securely insert files."
"If you want a very flexible system that you can easily integrate, and develop interfaces for it or plug-ins to other application environments, it's probably the most flexible"
"the security level is very high. After we tested it and checked all the security aspects of the product, we found that it's highly secure."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The solution can be a bit pricey."
"Their VAS product should be more productive because right now, we are using other VAS solutions but not using this one."
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
"Technical support could be improved."
"The major issue is price. I would also like them to make other aspects more accessible."
"I'd like to see support for reverse proxy and more security features."
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"While connectivity is not something that is under Citrix's control, if the connectivity is spotty, it can be difficult."
"The Outlook agent is not working well for installing it in the entire office."
"One important thing that we haven't found in this product is the ability to provide a read-only view for documents. Also, the ability for the customer to add annotations to these documents."
Earn 20 points
Citrix Gateway is ranked 11th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 33 reviews while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 44th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
