Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Dizzion comparison

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Read 4 Dizzion reviews

568 Views
381 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Citrix DaaS and Dizzion compete in the Desktop-as-a-Service market. Citrix DaaS has the upper hand with its strong integration and established presence, whereas Dizzion is favored for its emphasis on security, appealing to industries with stringent compliance needs.

Features: Citrix DaaS provides a seamless delivery of Windows applications, scalability options, and integration with existing IT infrastructures. Dizzion focuses on granular data control, strong security, and compliance features which are crucial for sectors like healthcare and finance.

Room for Improvement: Citrix could improve its initial setup costs and work on simplifying its deployment process. Dizzion might enhance integration capabilities to better cater to larger enterprises, improve scalability options, and consider broadening its feature set to appeal to a wider market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix DaaS focuses on integration with large-scale IT ecosystems, making it suitable for enterprises with complex requirements. Dizzion is preferred for its streamlined deployment, essential for organizations needing quick and secure virtualization solutions. Both companies offer comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix DaaS generally involves higher initial setup costs but provides a favorable ROI for larger enterprises due to its scalability and features. Dizzion offers competitive pricing emphasizing security, providing an attractive ROI for organizations where data protection is a priority.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion Report (Updated: August 2025).

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

3rd

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

Application Virtualization (1st), Remote Access (4th)

Dizzion

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

13th

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) category, the mindshare of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is 29.5%, down from 31.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dizzion is 4.5%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)	29.5%
Dizzion	4.5%
Other	66.0%

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

Featured Reviews

Grant Waddell

Head of IT Architecture & Operations Support at Lyntia

User-friendly and easily accessible, but cost could be made cheaper

We use Citrix Workspace on Citrix Cloud. We have all of our servers on the AWS public cloud. There are a number of tools that we can implement that would save us costs. However, we've stuck to Citrix for convenience. If the prices keep increasing, we will have to consider other solutions. Users need to understand the tool's limitations correctly and what they require from a usability perspective. They should also understand the configuration of security policies. In some cases, people are unable to download or upload files onto their PCs, which is necessary for them to do their work. Users should understand the limitations of the product or the configuration options. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Hamada Farag

Technology Consultant at Beta Information Technology

A cost-effective and streamlined virtual desktop infrastructure solution with a user-friendly interface and simplified management

The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency. The simplicity of the management tools is a key highlight, especially when compared to other solutions like Citrix, where there is often complexity due to various components such as controllers, storefronts, and different servers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Relative to other solutions, Citrix has fewer conditions and fewer parameters. Citrix also provides some flexibility because it can be used on any device."

"I recommend Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) for companies distributed across the world because it facilitates easy configuration and deployment without extensive infrastructure."

"The App is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature is how secure the solution is."

"One of the best features of Citrix Workspace is that we can access it from any device anywhere."

"For the most part, overall stability is what you would expect."

"Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is a stable solution."

"It is a good product. I don't have any complaints."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pros

"The pricing of the solution and management are good features."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good."

"Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade."

"The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency."

Cons

"There is room for slight improvement in performance optimization and interface refinement."

"Citrix's functionality depends on you having access to Microsoft Azure. Microsoft offers a broad range of features and solutions. Overall, it may make sense for some users to move all their services to Microsoft services."

"Their customer support can be improved a lot as it lacks a lot of knowledgeable help."

"Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is a complex solution."

"We had an issue when we were using the Citrix server. We needed to install the Citrix Runtime in the server where the application was hosted."

"If anything could be improved, it might be some of the Director functionality, and some of the dashboard customization, or the overall Director customization."

"The lag when using Skype or Screen Sharing with multiple users needs to improve, as it makes it difficult for us to continue when we have to restart the system."

"Citrix Workforce is good, but it needs improvement in diagnosing network issues. When errors occur, it is difficult to determine if they're due to network issues, Workspace issues, or environment issues"

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) cons

"The solution can be made faster and it should improve performance wise."

"It would be highly beneficial if they could offer a version that is entirely on-premises, eliminating the need for cloud connection except for data access."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"As the solution is not completely straightforward, you do need some experience to configure and implement it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Based not only on the cost of Citrix, but additional costs like firewalls, IPS, and other solutions, the total cost of switching users from using normal laptops with VPNs to connection via Citrix were so huge that the CEO of our company decided to postpone the deployment process."

"The price of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is approximately $300 for the new version called Dash and the license is approximately $900 annually."

"If you look at cost, then you must look at the number of users that you are covering. If you are only using it for some users, then it is very expensive. However, if you have a massive amount of users, then it begins to be interesting to use Citrix. Because once you are managing thousands of servers with one guy, your maintenance costs decrease per user."

"The purchase price was around $300,000 USD and then the maintenance fees were 20%. There are no other additional fees."

"It's my understanding that the solution license fee for each user is around $300 US. If we buy a personal laptop for each employee every five years, then the total cost is five times $300 US, or $1,500 USD. So we could buy 100 personal laptops instead of the Citrix solution."

"It is a bit costly, but enterprise class features come with a cost."

"The product, XenServer, is free to use, and XenApp has a one month free license."

"Their licensing model used to be on a per-year basis, where you would negotiate the cost per user for a year. For instance, if you had 25,000 users, you could negotiate the cost accordingly. However, they are transitioning to a subscription-based model where the cost is incurred monthly."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pricing and cost advice

"Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution."

"The licensing is based on the number of users of the solution."

"It is a cost-effective option with comparable functionality to competitors."

"The pricing of the solution is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Desktop as a Service (DaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	68

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

My focus has primarily been on publishing virtual applications.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What needs improvement with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I have found that Citrix DaaS is still a complex product, especially on the desktop side, which affects scalability. Although it works well on the apps side, the desktop aspect still has room for i...

What do you like most about Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution.

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame can be used to transition hardware and replace traditional hardware architecture like physical servers, storage, and SAN switches.

Azure Virtual Desktop vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Comparisons

Compared 51% of the time

Amazon Appstream vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 5% of the time

Rocket Exceed TurboX vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 3% of the time

Horizon 8 vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 3% of the time

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Competitors

VMware Workstation vs Dizzion

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon WorkSpaces vs Dizzion

Compared 17% of the time

Horizon Cloud Service vs Dizzion

Compared 16% of the time

Horizon 8 vs Dizzion

Compared 12% of the time

More Dizzion Competitors

Product Reports

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

September 2025

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) report

Download Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) product report

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

August 2025

Download Dizzion product report

Also Known As

XenDesktop, XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps), Citrix Workspace

Nutanix Xi Frame, Nutanix Frame

Interactive Demo

Citrix

Demo not available

Overview

Enable secure, flexible work with the leader in virtual apps and desktops

Deliver desktop as a service (DaaS) from any cloud or datacenter

Get started with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) in minutes to provide a familiar, high-performance digital workspace experience to your users. We’ll manage the infrastructure and security. You focus on your business.

Citrix

Dizzion provides cloud-delivered desktops designed to meet the needs of modern businesses. It offers a secure, flexible environment for managing virtual workloads, enhancing productivity, and ensuring seamless user experiences.

Specializing in virtual desktop infrastructure, Dizzion ensures organizations can securely deploy virtual desktops accessible from any device, enhancing remote work capabilities. This approach allows businesses to maintain operational continuity while securing sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry standards. By integrating with existing workflows, Dizzion supports enhanced productivity and scalability, leading to a more responsive IT environment.

What are the most important features of Dizzion?

Secure Endpoint Access: Protects data with comprehensive security protocols.
Scalability: Accommodates growing business needs with flexible capacity adjustments.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry-specific regulations and guidelines.
Performance Optimization: Delivers optimized user experiences through efficient resource management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Dizzion reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by minimizing hardware investments and IT management costs.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases workforce productivity by facilitating remote work.
Data Security: Protects sensitive information, maintaining trust and compliance.
Business Continuity: Supports uninterrupted operations across distributed environments.

Dizzion is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and call centers, allowing organizations to maintain security and compliance while enabling flexible, remote work solutions. Each industry benefits from tailored features that address unique compliance and security challenges, ensuring reliable performance.

Sample Customers

Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen