Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Dizzion comparison

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Read 4 Dizzion reviews

372 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 2, 2025

Citrix DaaS and Dizzion are competing in the Desktop as a Service market. Citrix DaaS seems to have the upper hand due to its strong emphasis on flexibility and integration with enterprise solutions.

Features: Citrix DaaS offers strong virtualization capabilities, seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure, and extensive scalability options. Dizzion focuses on providing secure virtual desktops with compliance-focused solutions, tailored especially for industries such as healthcare and finance.

Room for Improvement: Citrix DaaS could improve by enhancing security features to better cater to highly regulated industries. It may also work on simplifying the deployment process further and increasing cost-effectiveness. Dizzion could benefit from expanding its scalability options, improving integration with third-party tools, and offering better support for complex enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix DaaS provides a comprehensive support system backed by a robust knowledge base, easing the deployment process. Dizzion is recognized for its fast deployment and personalized support, appealing to businesses needing quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix DaaS involves higher initial costs but promises a good long-term ROI due to its scalability and integration strengths. Dizzion offers competitive pricing, focusing on providing cost-efficient security solutions, making it attractive for compliance-critical sectors.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion Report (Updated: June 2025).

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

3rd

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Application Virtualization (1st), Remote Access (4th)

Dizzion

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

13th

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) category, the mindshare of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is 34.8%, up from 31.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dizzion is 5.8%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

Featured Reviews

Grant Waddell

Head of IT Architecture & Operations Support at Lyntia

User-friendly and easily accessible, but cost could be made cheaper

We use Citrix Workspace on Citrix Cloud. We have all of our servers on the AWS public cloud. There are a number of tools that we can implement that would save us costs. However, we've stuck to Citrix for convenience. If the prices keep increasing, we will have to consider other solutions. Users need to understand the tool's limitations correctly and what they require from a usability perspective. They should also understand the configuration of security policies. In some cases, people are unable to download or upload files onto their PCs, which is necessary for them to do their work. Users should understand the limitations of the product or the configuration options. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Hamada Farag

Technology Consultant at Beta Information Technology

A cost-effective and streamlined virtual desktop infrastructure solution with a user-friendly interface and simplified management

The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency. The simplicity of the management tools is a key highlight, especially when compared to other solutions like Citrix, where there is often complexity due to various components such as controllers, storefronts, and different servers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It allows us to mute users who adhere to a policy of not allowing direct VPN access for security reasons. It is easy to use."

"In terms of scalability, Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops have a lot of technologies baked in there that allow an organization to scale up or down, as required. Further, leveraging Azure for scalability has added value to our organization. For example, pre-COVID-19, we had very few resources in Azure. We had some Virtual Desktops and no application servers. When COVID-19 came along, we knew people were going to be home. We knew that we had to ramp up very quickly. We fully leveraged MCS to be able to scale. Being able to take a single image and build 400,000 Virtual Desktops, all within minutes, was second to none in terms of any other technology out there that we could have used. The scalability to be able to do that in Azure, where we really don't have to worry about storage and compute power because Microsoft does that for us, was fantastic. It was almost like giving our environments steroids. It has been amazing in terms of that scalability. Now, as people start coming back to the office, we can just as quickly scale down so the compute and resource costs in Azure aren't so great anymore."

"From my perspective, the most valuable feature is the manageability."

"We can provide tons of applications with different settings, behaviors, and operating systems. It is the same way for the user. Then, we are totally transparent for the user to use a lot of totally different applications, which is the most important part of Citrix today."

"For the most part, overall stability is what you would expect."

"There are many features that I like, but the stability over the Internet is exceptional. Even if there's bandwidth fluctuation or network jitter, it performs well, offering a seamless experience to end-users without noticeable disruptions."

"Citrix offers a range of products that can be used straight out of the box."

"The architecture I built had a robust failover mechanism for the endpoints, and the interface was user-friendly."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pros

"Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good."

"The pricing of the solution and management are good features."

"The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency."

Cons

"It is slow. When everybody is logged in, it does have a tendency to slow down. You can tell the connectivity slows down a little bit, but it's still a good product."

"I've recently tried to use Citrix on Ubuntu, and I don't know if this is an Ubuntu issue or a vendor issue, but you can't use Citrix right now on Ubuntu 20.04."

"Citrix duplicates multiple processes."

"Tech support can be slow if you do not receive help from the US representatives."

"I think improvement around the Analytics piece is super important. There has been a lot of maturity over the last year in that area, though a lot more needs to be done. Also, a lot more of the value of those Analytics needs to be sold to end users. Citrix is working on a lot of things that are ahead of the curve and a lot of organizations aren't quite there yet with implementing those technologies and capabilities."

"The Citrix Workspace interface could improve. Additionally, if they are able to provide a mobile application"

"The solution's cost has almost doubled this year, and it could be made cheaper."

"Citrix Workforce is good, but it needs improvement in diagnosing network issues. When errors occur, it is difficult to determine if they're due to network issues, Workspace issues, or environment issues"

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) cons

"It would be highly beneficial if they could offer a version that is entirely on-premises, eliminating the need for cloud connection except for data access."

"As the solution is not completely straightforward, you do need some experience to configure and implement it."

"The solution can be made faster and it should improve performance wise."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't have a lot to compare it to, but we certainly think whatever we pay is worthwhile at this point in time. It's very reasonable."

"It's my understanding that the solution license fee for each user is around $300 US. If we buy a personal laptop for each employee every five years, then the total cost is five times $300 US, or $1,500 USD. So we could buy 100 personal laptops instead of the Citrix solution."

"Citrix is a mid-range cost solution compared to some others out there."

"The licensing, in general, is expensive. A lot of customers battle to pay the amount. It's very difficult to ensure that your solution provides the business value that the customer is after."

"You have to do some hard work in order to get the suitable licenses."

"The licenses are affordable, but the support is a bit expensive, though worth the value."

"Citrix solutions cost a lot in comparison with competitors, like Azure Virtual Desktop or VMware Horizon. Those solutions cost around 50 to 60 percent less, per month per user, than Citrix."

"The tool is expensive."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pricing and cost advice

"It is a cost-effective option with comparable functionality to competitors."

"Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution."

"The pricing of the solution is very good."

"The licensing is based on the number of users of the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Desktop as a Service (DaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

My focus has primarily been on publishing virtual applications.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What needs improvement with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I have found that Citrix DaaS is still a complex product, especially on the desktop side, which affects scalability. Although it works well on the apps side, the desktop aspect still has room for i...

What do you like most about Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution.

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame can be used to transition hardware and replace traditional hardware architecture like physical servers, storage, and SAN switches.

Azure Virtual Desktop vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

Amazon Appstream vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 7% of the time

Rocket Exceed TurboX vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 5% of the time

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Competitors

Horizon 8 vs Dizzion

Compared 27% of the time

Amazon WorkSpaces vs Dizzion

Compared 27% of the time

More Dizzion Competitors

Product Reports

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

June 2025

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) report

Download Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) product report

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

May 2025

Download Dizzion product report

Also Known As

XenDesktop, XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps), Citrix Workspace

Nutanix Xi Frame, Nutanix Frame

Interactive Demo

Citrix

Demo not available

Overview

Enable secure, flexible work with the leader in virtual apps and desktops

Deliver desktop as a service (DaaS) from any cloud or datacenter

Get started with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) in minutes to provide a familiar, high-performance digital workspace experience to your users. We’ll manage the infrastructure and security. You focus on your business.

Citrix

Dizzion provides cloud-delivered desktops designed to meet the needs of modern businesses. It offers a secure, flexible environment for managing virtual workloads, enhancing productivity, and ensuring seamless user experiences.

Specializing in virtual desktop infrastructure, Dizzion ensures organizations can securely deploy virtual desktops accessible from any device, enhancing remote work capabilities. This approach allows businesses to maintain operational continuity while securing sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry standards. By integrating with existing workflows, Dizzion supports enhanced productivity and scalability, leading to a more responsive IT environment.

What are the most important features of Dizzion?

Secure Endpoint Access: Protects data with comprehensive security protocols.
Scalability: Accommodates growing business needs with flexible capacity adjustments.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry-specific regulations and guidelines.
Performance Optimization: Delivers optimized user experiences through efficient resource management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Dizzion reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by minimizing hardware investments and IT management costs.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases workforce productivity by facilitating remote work.
Data Security: Protects sensitive information, maintaining trust and compliance.
Business Continuity: Supports uninterrupted operations across distributed environments.

Dizzion is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and call centers, allowing organizations to maintain security and compliance while enabling flexible, remote work solutions. Each industry benefits from tailored features that address unique compliance and security challenges, ensuring reliable performance.

Sample Customers

Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen