Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Cisco and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Cisco holds a 7.1% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,501 Views
1,471 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

944 Views
831 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

Supermicro SuperBlade and Cisco UCS B-Series compete in the high-performance computing market. Cisco UCS B-Series generally has the upper hand due to its advanced features, while Supermicro SuperBlade is praised for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Supermicro SuperBlade offers energy efficiency, a modular design for customization, and substantial scalability. Cisco UCS B-Series boasts robust integration capabilities, strong virtual environment support, and a unified computing architecture.

Room for Improvement: Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance its virtual support, documentation, and up-front feature set. Cisco UCS B-Series can improve user interface simplicity, initial setup time, and hardware variety.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Supermicro SuperBlade is known for easy deployment and responsive customer support. Cisco UCS B-Series offers comprehensive support and documentation, requiring more technical expertise for integration.

Pricing and ROI: Supermicro SuperBlade is noted for its lower initial costs, offering quick ROI. Cisco UCS B-Series, with a higher initial expenditure, delivers long-term ROI through its advanced features and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.1%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 8.2%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series	7.1%
Supermicro SuperBlade	8.2%
Other	84.7%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Muhammad AlihyderBhuiyan

Head of IT Operations at NCC BANK LIMITED

Efficient server management reduces costs and supports seamless operations

Cisco UCS B-Series has reliably sustained smooth operations without the need for significant maintenance. Its administration capabilities provide easy access to performance reports, logs, and utilization data, which are essential for effective server management. Additionally, the integration capabilities are seamless, and the power consumption and heat generation are low, resulting in reduced cooling costs and increased financial benefits.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is simple, and not very complex."

"If we could get more reference architecture available on the portal, it would be helpful in making decisions"

"In terms of the flexibility of the tool to adapt to technology needs, I think it is a very good solution."

"The scalability is good because it comes with Fabric Interconnects, and you can directly add more blades as you go. Therefore, scalability is not a problem."

"The most beneficial feature is UCS Manager. It's the best way to manage hardware, creating group policies, like scrub policies and maintenance policies."

"Since its UCS release in 2009, Cisco has extended the core functionality with Central, a tool for managing multiple domains"

"Overall service and support from Cisco is very good."

"I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

Cons

"The main issue with this solution is that it is quite vendor-restricted, meaning that when we use third party software, we cannot use all of the available configuration tools or pre-validated design features."

"The graphic code that UCS can support is limited and less accessible than other systems."

"The solution is expensive."

"Cisco could improve the user-friendliness for less experienced users."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"The initial setup process is complex."

"The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly."

"The solution is difficult to set up."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It makes much more sense for individual licenses for distributed environments"

"UCS is expensive, and we will be migrating to the cheaper HP servers."

"There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution on a yearly basis. Price-wise, it is an expensive product"

"Cisco UCS B-Series is an expensive solution."

"Compared to the more in-demand hyper-converged environments such as Nutanix or DVX rail, Cisco UCS B-Series is even more costly due to the expensive fabric interconnects."

"It is highly-priced."

"The product cost is high."

"The licensing cost is a little bit expensive because by default, it depends on your fabric interconnect model. Most of the time, however, Cisco provides a lot of promotions to the customers, so the cost can be waived for many projects. The price of the chassis itself is fair."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 23% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 10% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 12% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

January 2026

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

SuperBlade

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

Supermicro SuperBlade delivers innovative computing performance and efficiency, perfect for data-intensive tasks. With its modular design, it optimizes space and power, providing a flexible and scalable infrastructure for demanding business workloads.

Supermicro SuperBlade is specifically engineered for modern data centers needing high-density computing. It offers a compact, modular architecture that simplifies system management and enhances agility. It integrates seamlessly with cloud and virtualization technologies, supporting diverse applications and workloads. Its design focuses on reducing operational costs while achieving peak performance. Users appreciate its balance of power efficiency and high computing capacity.

What are the key features of Supermicro SuperBlade?

High-Density Design: Packs multiple servers in a small form to maximize computing power per square foot.
Scalability: Easily expand or modify with modular components to adapt to growing demands.
Efficient Cooling: Advanced cooling systems ensure optimal performance and energy efficiency.
Built-In Management: Integrated management tools for streamlined operations and monitoring.
Green Computing: Focuses on energy savings for cost-effective and ecological operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Supermicro SuperBlade?

Cost Savings: Reduces energy and operational expenses with its efficient design.
Improved Performance: Delivers exceptional processing power for faster task execution.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes IT resource utilization and efficiency.
Ease of Management: Simplifies management processes, reducing administrative overhead.
Future-Proofing: Provides flexible expansion options to accommodate future growth.

Supermicro SuperBlade is widely implemented in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and research where high computational power and storage are critical. In finance, it's used for real-time analytics and transactions. Healthcare facilities use it for patient data analysis and complex simulations, while research institutions leverage SuperBlade for simulations and data-intensive research tasks. Its adaptability allows enterprises to efficiently meet technical requirements unique to each industry.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Prace

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.