Cisco UCS B-Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade comparison

Cisco and Supermicro are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Supermicro is ranked #8. Cisco holds a 7.1% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to Supermicro’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Supermicro users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS B-Series

Read 74 Cisco UCS B-Series reviews

1,501 Views
1,471 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Supermicro SuperBlade

Read 4 Supermicro SuperBlade reviews

944 Views
831 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS B-Series

Supermicro SuperBlade

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

Supermicro SuperBlade and Cisco UCS B-Series compete in the high-performance computing market. Cisco UCS B-Series generally has the upper hand due to its advanced features, while Supermicro SuperBlade is praised for its pricing and customer support.

Features: Supermicro SuperBlade offers energy efficiency, a modular design for customization, and substantial scalability. Cisco UCS B-Series boasts robust integration capabilities, strong virtual environment support, and a unified computing architecture.

Room for Improvement: Supermicro SuperBlade could enhance its virtual support, documentation, and up-front feature set. Cisco UCS B-Series can improve user interface simplicity, initial setup time, and hardware variety.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Supermicro SuperBlade is known for easy deployment and responsive customer support. Cisco UCS B-Series offers comprehensive support and documentation, requiring more technical expertise for integration.

Pricing and ROI: Supermicro SuperBlade is noted for its lower initial costs, offering quick ROI. Cisco UCS B-Series, with a higher initial expenditure, delivers long-term ROI through its advanced features and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,637 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS B-Series

Ranking in Blade Servers

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Supermicro SuperBlade

Ranking in Blade Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS B-Series is 7.1%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supermicro SuperBlade is 8.2%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS B-Series	7.1%
Supermicro SuperBlade	8.2%
Other	84.7%

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Muhammad AlihyderBhuiyan

Head of IT Operations at NCC BANK LIMITED

Efficient server management reduces costs and supports seamless operations

Cisco UCS B-Series has reliably sustained smooth operations without the need for significant maintenance. Its administration capabilities provide easy access to performance reports, logs, and utilization data, which are essential for effective server management. Additionally, the integration capabilities are seamless, and the power consumption and heat generation are low, resulting in reduced cooling costs and increased financial benefits.

Read full review

Gergely Lakos

DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

With many servers in one, these blade servers are easier to manage

The service could be improved by faster servers, more widely available VMs, and more storage in one place. Then, in the event of a blade failure, we could start our VMs on another blade in a couple of minutes. This is why we wanted to buy storage. But now, we want to buy a twin server with 24 VMware discs to create test storage. The next product release should allow more servers to be controlled simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."

"The stability of Cisco UCS B-Series is impeccable, as it has been running smoothly without any need for maintenance."

"The solution is very reliable in comparison to the other brands."

"It is a very robust and reliable solution."

"If we could get more reference architecture available on the portal, it would be helpful in making decisions"

"The feature that I found the most value is the abstract and stateless capacities."

"The most valuable feature is the service profile."

"The Cisco solution provides a unified dashboard which enhances virtualization tasks, allowing configurations from a single interface. It also helps with space and power management, which are vital for data center efficiency."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The ability to save resource is a key feature."

"I think the IPMI is a really good feature."

Cons

"Previously, the unified port functionality allowed the same port to function as both FC and Ethernet, however, this has now changed."

"Its scalability could be better."

"The cost is expensive and has room for improvement."

"Integration with storage could be improved."

"The product could be made more secure."

"The management interface needs a lot of improvement. As it is right now, it's a pain to use. It's not user-friendly."

"There is a delay in the product's reporting and the rebooting system compared to servers from other vendors."

"The price of the solution could improve."

More Cisco UCS B-Series cons

"Supermicro blade servers are not the best. They could improve in scalability but are not really scalable right now."

"There is a lack of support for fiber channels currently that needs to be added."

"The solution does not scale well."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing will be based on your requirements so it is important to plan, engage, and negotiate directly with the Cisco Account Manager."

"Make sure you work with a vendor partner than can get you a substantial discount off of list pricing."

"Cisco UCS B-Series is an expensive solution."

"Cisco UCS B-Series is not a cheap solution."

"It is highly-priced."

"Pricing with Cisco is very high."

"The price of this solution compared to others is fair."

"We have to pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution."

More Cisco UCS B-Series pricing and cost advice

"The product is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Performing Arts

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	41

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS B-Series?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easily scalable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS B-Series?

Comparing Cisco UCS B-Series with traditional servers, while its initial cost may be slightly higher, it is not as expensive as Oracle Exadata, making it a worthwhile investment. It pays off in the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS B-Series?

There is a need for Cisco UCS B-Series to evolve and scale vertically, particularly with the increasing data demands and the integration of AI, ensuring the solution remains certified and capable u...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 24% of the time

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge C- Series vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 9% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-Series

Compared 8% of the time

More Cisco UCS B-Series Competitors

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 18% of the time

NEC Sigmablade-H vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 11% of the time

HPE BladeSystem vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Synergy vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs Supermicro SuperBlade

Compared 7% of the time

More Supermicro SuperBlade Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series

February 2026

Download Cisco UCS B-Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

February 2026

Download Supermicro SuperBlade product report

Also Known As

UCS B-Series, Unified Computing System B-Series

SuperBlade

Overview

Based on Intel Xeon processor E7 and E5 product families, Cisco UCS B-Series Blade Servers work with virtualized and non-virtualized applications to increase: Performance, Energy efficiency, Flexibility and Administrator productivity.

Cisco

Supermicro SuperBlade offers a scalable and efficient server solution designed to maximize performance and reduce operational costs, making it ideal for dynamic IT environments.

Recognized for its modular architecture, Supermicro SuperBlade enhances computing performance, facilitating seamless workloads in high-demand industries. Its innovative design allows organizations to efficiently handle complex operations with reduced power consumption and optimized resource allocation.

What are the most important features?

Modular Design: Enables seamless integration and scalability to meet growing IT demands.
High-Density Computing: Maximizes space usage with increased compute density.
Flexible Configuration: Supports diverse hardware configurations for various application needs.
Reduced Power Consumption: Offers energy-efficient operations, lowering operational expenses.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure and maintenance costs through optimized resource use.
Scalability: Provides the capability to expand IT capacity without significant downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances performance with high-density design tailored for demanding workloads.
Energy Savings: Lowers electricity usage, contributing to sustainability goals.

In sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology, Supermicro SuperBlade is implemented to support critical data processing and complex computational tasks. Its adaptability and robust performance cater to industry-specific applications and IT infrastructure demands, ensuring reliable and scalable operations.

Supermicro

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Anonymous Banking Group, Artoni Transporti, Bellevue, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Hertz, Houston Methodist, Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Lufthansa Systems GmbH & Co.KG, Outscale, Sony Corporation, Talbots

Prace

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Supermicro SuperBlade report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.