Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Lumu comparison

Cisco and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 3.5% mindshare in ID, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Read 69 Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) reviews

2,018 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,747 Views
821 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco Secure IPS and Lumu are competing in the cybersecurity solutions category. Lumu appears to have the upper hand due to its superior threat intelligence and ease of integration, making it favored by tech buyers who value these aspects.

Features: Cisco Secure IPS offers real-time threat inspection, advanced malware protection, and integration capabilities with third-party solutions. Lumu provides continuous compromise assessments, actionable intelligence, and intuitive analytics for proactive threat response.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Secure IPS could enhance its ease of use and reduce deployment complexity while improving its user interface for better accessibility. Additionally, more flexible pricing options may increase its appeal. Lumu can benefit from expanding its feature set to include more customizable threat detection rules, enhancing its data visualization capabilities, and offering deeper insights into potential threats.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Secure IPS has a complex deployment process supported by extensive documentation and expert assistance. Lumu's straightforward deployment process, flexible cloud-based solutions, and responsive customer service provide a swifter implementation experience.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure IPS involves higher upfront costs but is justified by its comprehensive protection features. Lumu offers a more cost-effective solution with strong ROI, primarily due to efficient threat identification and mitigation capabilities, aligning well with buyer expectations for maximizing cybersecurity investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is 3.5%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	2.2%
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)	3.5%
Other	94.3%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

reviewer373227

System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Marketing strengths shine but regaining user trust needs significant effort

There are numerous things that could be improved about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) to get it back on track. Sollution for small branches: when we have to connect a lot very small branches (or sometimes only an ATM) we need something small, with LTE and with reasonable price. Cisco response is SDWAN but it is not always the case. Recently Cisco released some small firewalls but I have not tried them yet. Central management with FMC is a very good idea, but sometimes local management or monitoring is helpfull. With Cisco You have to decide: central or local. You cannot have both. Regarding usability, when you commit configuration on Cisco, it sometimes takes very long. Commits also take some time for the competition, but Cisco is definitely lagging behind the rest in this respect. Last but not least, for me as a professional is lack of CLI. With CLI, I can configure every firewall on the market except Cisco. CLI is very important in professional working, and IMHO it was an unwise decision by Cisco to remove it. Graphical interfaces are very nice, but when you've got thousands of objects in a big installation and have to configure many things, CLI is a much faster way to do it.

Read full review

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about Cisco is their good marketing force; we appreciate doing business with Cisco all the time, and I'd love to sell and install Cisco switches and other things."

"Among all the different solutions I have worked with, such as Palo Alto many other firewalls. Cisco has the support, documentation, and design. The documentation is widely available and it can help you a lot with implementation. It makes the implementation much easier."

"The solution gives us a lot of visibility into our security."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"Good IPS and VirtualBox features."

"The features that I find most valuable are the DDoS protection, IPS/IDS, and Firepower for web application filtering."

"The most valuable features of Cisco NGIPS are protection and reporting."

"The IPS functionality is useful if you have offices all over the place. It's nice to have centralized management instead of going to a separate ASA or FirePOWER device."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pros

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

Cons

"I think that some initiation scripts might be helpful because they would make the configuration easier and more user-friendly for customers."

"We would like to see improvements in the dashboard features."

"The stability needs improvement so is rated a four out of ten."

"I don't recommend Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) unless the network infrastructure is predominantly Cisco."

"I would recommend this solution to others for medium, large, and enterprise businesses only."

"I think the part of IPS and everything else needs to be better equated to the real needs or current needs of the business compared to the other manufacturer, because it is not straightforward, a way to configure it compared to the other competitors."

"I would like to see a more user-friendly interface."

"The SSL decrypt could be improved, but it's normal. All the devices in our platform need a lot of memory or CPU to do the SSL decrypt. This is an issue to improve in all platforms, not only in Cisco."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) cons

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"The reports need improvement."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco NGIPS is an expensive product."

"There are licensing fees depending on the features that you are using."

"This is a very affordable product."

"The solution is pricey, but worth it."

"The cost of the license depends on the level of support that you have with Cisco."

"It could be less expensive."

"We get cut in price since we use other Cisco products. We have the whole bundle of Cisco solutions."

"I usually work with Fortinet and FortiGate which is a lower cost in comparison with Cisco NGIPS."

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) pricing and cost advice

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

10%

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco NGIPS?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco NGIPS?

Cisco is one of the top brands known for cost-effectiveness, making it worth the money. It's cheaper to integrate with existing IT security solutions compared to other expensive brands with subscri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco NGIPS?

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point IPS vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

Compared 10% of the time

More Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 34% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)

January 2026

Download Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

Sourcefire NGIPS, Firepower NGIPS

No data available

Overview

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) provides intrusion prevention, malware detection, and DDoS protection with modularity, third-party integration, and cloud capabilities, focusing on flexibility, automation, and real-time threat detection, while offering centralized management and ease of upgrading.

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) is designed to support network security through an open platform, delivering features such as anomaly detection and security intelligence. Users benefit from robust technical support, making it a reliable choice for enterprises seeking to protect their network infrastructures. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness, interface complexity, and integration with third-party tools. There is a demand for better reporting, sandboxing capabilities, and enhanced AI-driven threat detection and response times, especially for zero-day attacks. Pricing remains a concern due to high costs and licensing complexity.

What are the key features of Cisco Secure IPS?

Intrusion Prevention: Detect and block malicious activities across networks to maintain security.
Malware Detection: Identify and mitigate malicious software in real time.
DDoS Protection: Safeguard against distributed denial-of-service attacks that can disrupt operations.
Integration: Seamlessly connect with third-party tools for enhanced functionality.
Cloud Capabilities: Use cloud-based resources for scalable and flexible security solutions.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identify potential threats instantly to prevent exploitation.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Centralized management and hardware-free upgrading help reduce expenses.
Flexibility: Modular design and open platform ensure adaptability to changing needs.
Support: Access to expert technical assistance ensures smooth operations.
Scalability: Cloud deployment options offer enhanced scalability for growing demands.

Businesses deploy Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) in both on-premises and cloud environments, addressing needs like compliance audits and integration with platforms such as Cisco Talos and Umbrella. Its implementation strengthens perimeter security, enhances cybersecurity in enterprise and banking sectors, and ensures effective threat management for network defense.

Cisco

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

American Electric Power, Huntington Bank, Keycorp, Nationwide, Transunion, Marriott, Inova Health, Ford, Thomson Reuters, Dow Chemical, Equifax, Chevron, Walmart, Coca Cola

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu

December 2025

Free Report: Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.