No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Nexus Dashboard vs Device42 comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus Dashboard
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Data Center Networking (10th)
Device42
Ranking in Data Center Infrastructure Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (6th), Configuration Management Databases (1st), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Center Infrastructure Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Nexus Dashboard is 1.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Device42 is 10.9%, up from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Center Infrastructure Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Device4210.9%
Cisco Nexus Dashboard1.5%
Other87.6%
Data Center Infrastructure Management
 

Featured Reviews

Karthik Shivaram - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Director at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD
Centralized visibility has improved monitoring while integration and automation still need progress
I can tell several advantages of Cisco Nexus Dashboard like centralized management that allows managing and monitoring multiple Nexus switches and data center fabrics from one platform. It provides multi-site visibility because of the visibility across multiple data center sites. There are plenty of parameters, and the automation is more advanced than it was earlier, which has reduced manual work in automation. Real-time monitoring, health performance, and network status visibility, as well as analytics, both historical and real-time telemetry, help identify performance issues. End-to-end visibility refers to the reliability from the application to the end user. This is a major benefit, as it includes application to networking visibility, traffic flow visibility, fabric-wide health monitoring, interface error and packet drops, latency and performance monitoring. Cisco Nexus Dashboard also provides multi-site visibility and proactive identification of network issues.
Manmohan Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited
Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning
Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like the most about Cisco Nexus Dashboard is the easier way to know exactly which device is connected to where."
"Regarding return on investment for Cisco Nexus Dashboard, I would say 100%."
"Cisco Nexus Dashboard is very advanced and very smart, and it has a Cisco brand name to it."
"I can tell several advantages of Cisco Nexus Dashboard like centralized management that allows managing and monitoring multiple Nexus switches and data center fabrics from one platform."
"Customers who have adopted Cisco Nexus Dashboard experience benefits due to their existing Nexus infrastructure, which typically includes twenty to thirty switches arranged in a leaf and spine architecture."
"The feature I appreciate most about Cisco Nexus Dashboard is the ability to control everything in one centralized place."
"Device42 positively impacts our organization by providing dependency mapping for our devices, and it integrates well with applications, especially our cloud service Microsoft Azure, giving us complete visibility across our infrastructure for efficient operations and modern compliance."
"The solution is agentless."
"The solution's CMDB, ITAM, and DCIM features create a single source of IT truth in our environment."
"Device42 is a really impressive tool."
"The tool is user-friendly, easy to understand, and flexible."
"The most valuable part is the ease of use. There's no training involved. It's pretty simple and straightforward."
"Previously, our company had a lot of issues keeping track of all the data centers and the inventory, as well as the purchase orders. All of these were managed by other tools. The good thing about Device42 is that it can be used for all this together. We don't need to spend time checking many other tools and files."
"I've used NetBox, MyIP, and RackTables; I've used quite a bunch of these other tools out there, and honestly, Device42 is the best."
 

Cons

"In terms of significant differences between Arista and Cisco, Arista takes a multi-vendor approach while Cisco Nexus Dashboard remains mostly Cisco-centric."
"In terms of potential improvement areas for Cisco Nexus Dashboard, I think licensing could be better, which is the main thing I can think of."
"The professional services and license is expensive everywhere."
"The first time when we got Cisco deployed, for some reason, it was not as scalable as how we wanted because the leaves stopped growing after approximately 150 or something."
"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Nexus Dashboard is that it is expensive."
"In terms of scalability, Cisco has lots of limitations, and unnecessary licensing will be involved."
"I have not seen a return on investment with Device42, as it primarily provides information and not revenue."
"My biggest problem with the product is the upgrades. First, we have to do them manually and second, not this last time but the time before that, we actually had to build a new VM to deploy the solution again. We had to back it up and then restore it to the new version. That was inconvenient."
"When servers have two network adapters, automatically discovered will be only one network card because the other one is a backup. Device42 has some problems to find the other connection."
"From a documentation and reporting standpoint, at present, it is useful, but I feel that it can be improved because it currently feels incomplete in certain areas."
"In my experience I believe that the key concern is the pricing strategy of the solution. Instead other solutions such as lanweber are much more cost effective. Previously, Device42 operated on perpetualysis without any fees. But recently they have altered the pricing model to include a subscription fee which I see as a very costly affair. Therefore I would like to suggest that they evaluate their pricing strategy and licence scheme, conduct a market research and ensure that they provide the right product in the market at the right price."
"I would like to see API management as an additional feature in the tool's future versions. It will give more API security."
"Device42 is a main part of our processes. We need reliability, not only in terms of the data but with the solution itself."
"Mapping items wasn't as intuitive as importing in Device42, so this is an area for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."
"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."
"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."
"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."
"We pay $100,000 per year."
"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."
"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."
"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Center Infrastructure Management solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus Dashboard?
In terms of pricing, Cisco products, including Cisco Nexus Dashboard and others, are very high compared to competitors. I am supplying materials across the globe for most of my projects in metro ar...
What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus Dashboard?
In terms of improvement with Cisco Nexus Dashboard, I see integration limitations, as it has some limitations when it comes to integrating the fabrics. They can expand that enablement to add multip...
What is your primary use case for Cisco Nexus Dashboard?
I acknowledge that some of our customers are using Cisco Enterprise routers. I have been dealing with this product for more than a decade. I generally recommend Cisco Enterprise routers for types o...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be co...
What needs improvement with Device42?
I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the su...
What is your primary use case for Device42?
My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different p...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus Dashboard vs. Device42 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.