Cisco Meraki MX vs Stormshield Network Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Stormshield are both solutions in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Stormshield is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 8.3% mindshare in UTMU, compared to Stormshield’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Stormshield users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki MX

Read 83 Cisco Meraki MX reviews

15,470 Views
4,796 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Stormshield Network Security

Read 18 Stormshield Network Security reviews

4,439 Views
1,909 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MX

Stormshield Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Stormshield Network Security and Cisco Meraki MX compete in the network security space, each with distinct advantages. Cisco Meraki MX seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and cloud management capabilities, appealing to those in need of a flexible security solution.

Features: Stormshield Network Security provides comprehensive threat protection through features like the Stormshield Analyzer, object group-based firewalling, and robust security integration. Meraki MX offers a cloud management platform, auto VPN capabilities for remote workers, and advanced security features like threat detection and traffic shaping.

Room for Improvement: Stormshield could benefit from a more intuitive user interface, enhanced scalability, and improved cloud integration. Meraki MX might improve by offering more budget-friendly pricing, expanding firmware support, and enhancing customization options for specific enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX is favored for its ease of deployment and cloud-based management, making it simple for IT teams to deploy remotely. Stormshield may have a steeper learning curve, but it compensates with robust customer support, ensuring help is readily available for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Stormshield Network Security is often more budget-friendly, appealing to those with immediate budget constraints. Cisco Meraki MX, while more expensive initially, is seen as providing substantial ROI through sophisticated features and scalability, making it an attractive long-term investment for businesses looking to integrate cloud management with security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MX

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (8th)

Stormshield Network Security

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki MX is 8.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stormshield Network Security is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Threat Management (UTM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki MX	8.3%
Stormshield Network Security	3.8%
Other	87.9%

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisYankajtis

Systems Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Cloud-managed firewalls have simplified clinic networks and have empowered rapid remote deployment

If there was anything I can say I don't about it, I wish the automation was a little bit more friendly. If someone doesn't know too much about automations, I wish it had the ability within the platform to say, 'I want to run this automation within this network. Here's the new network that's coming on board. I'm utilizing the same firewalls, the same switches, same MVs. Here's the subnet that I'm going to use. Here are the IPs for the devices.' It should be able to give me that run book and configure it. That would be my main thing within the automation. I don't have much else to complain about. Everything is pretty straightforward. Back in the day, about five years ago, I tried to run 10 terabytes of data on an MX95 with a gig fiber coming in. The firewall was doing all the routing at the time and all the Layer 3. I did see some degraded performance trying to push that data through my MS350 10 gig switch. Once I moved the Layer 3 off the firewall and placed it on my core switch, I saw a better improvement. However, that was five years ago, and I'm not pushing that type of data out now. If the splash page was a little bit more appealing and more configurable, I think that would be nice.

Read full review

Zsolt Jónás

System Administrator at NaxoNet

Advanced GUI and layered security have supported compliance and simplified intrusion prevention

I haven't had a task that I couldn't solve with Stormshield Network Security. The active-active high availability solution would be beneficial because currently, if you build a high availability solution with Stormshield Network Security, you have a main device and another one is a backup device. The HA can switch between them, but it would be good to have a master-master solution, not just a master-slave one. I could set a URL that I can call to update the DNS record. Currently, Stormshield Network Security devices support DynDNS, which is not a usual feature request from a server environment. I have my own solution instead of DynDNS because I don't prefer it, so I have my own service for that. However, the GUI does not support using a custom service instead of DynDNS. I had to solve it in the console on Stormshield Network Security device, but it would be much better if it was reachable on the GUI. I had to figure out a trick for the IPsec configuration. In the IPsec config, we have to provide the remote side's IP address, but it's always changing. This means that an office, for example a company that has an office but without a fixed IP address, cannot be used with IPsec VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Meraki is still best for an office FW, with simple categories, features, and SDWAN, and the zero deployment is a killer feature."

"It's a good solution; if they're looking for something that is easy to use, easy to deploy, and easy to support, maybe they should consider Meraki, given the product is very stable."

"Traffic Shaping: The device lets you decide how you want to use your internet services. Due to the fact that Meraki can accept dual WAN, you can decide the way you balance the data traffic."

"We switched to Meraki because it lets you see what's happening in your LAN and WAN in a graphic and web environment."

"In general, Meraki MX is easy to work with."

"The technical support people from Meraki are brilliant."

"I love the simplicity of Meraki MX — specifically, the simplicity of the dashboard."

"The most valuable feature is that we didn't have any problems with Meraki MX."

More Cisco Meraki MX pros

"I feel we have more options with the Stormshield firewall and new features that we haven't previously had."

"Ease of use is the best feature of the product."

"A very robust product."

"The StormShield solution has enabled us to fully implement best practices from Microsoft in the cloud : the hub and spoke architecture."

"Stormshield is pretty robust, compared to other products like Fortinet, as you get more security with Stormshield and spend less money."

"This product has improved the way our organization functions."

"Stormshield is a very strong firewall and very easy to configure and maintain."

"Stormshield Network Security is a very stable solution and the solution works perfectly so we never had to contact technical support."

More Stormshield Network Security pros

Cons

"It is very expensive."

"It would be nice if the different services, including the SIEM SOC and endpoint detection and response (EDR) were integrated into one, so that I don't have to go to different vendors for different services."

"I find it very expensive when discussing the cost of Cisco Meraki MX."

"The Cisco supply chain is problematic although that may not be all their fault."

"The main drawback is that recurring license costs need to be considered as part of the long-term operating budget."

"Data is the only path, so optimization is essential."

"However, the pricing is a bit high compared to other vendors such as Fortinet or Huawei."

"From the improvement perspective, we need more monitoring capabilities. We want to have full-based access visibility, such as, what is happening when something is trying to reach and it is denying. We cannot see some parts of it. The integration of active directory with this product is not very fruitful. It has some bugs or lacks in the functionality of active directory integration. We are unable to identify where exactly and whether it has really applied our policy."

More Cisco Meraki MX cons

"One thing, though, is that not all the fields are activated yet and we were informed that it will take at least one month."

"The filtering configuration could be better. We have some difficulties with the filtering configuration and the filter extension. It's not that easy. It's not that straightforward. In the next release, I would like to see a reporting system. Stormshield doesn't have any tutorials on how to do the configuration and things like that. They just have documentation on the website. If you want to configure, for example, Cisco or Fortinet, you can find tutorials on YouTube. They show you how to configure the features, and so on. In Stormshield, there is nothing on social media or the internet on how to configure different things. The lack of documentation or the lack of material makes it difficult for others to adopt this solution."

"It could be better if it were more user-friendly for us as we dont use it very often even if we never had problems to modify setup when needed."

"A more user-friendly interface would be helpful."

"This is not a next-generation firewall."

"The stability is not that good based on my experience. We have a lot of disruptions when it comes to Stormshield."

"Improvement is also needed in terms of the technical support of the manufacturer, they're not very responsive when it comes to technical support."

"The main area of this product that has room for improvement is pricing. Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

More Stormshield Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive."

"Meraki is the best option — based on the price and the features available."

"Like any Cisco product, the license is really expensive for small business clients. It needs to be cheaper. If you look it up, you might go, "That doesn't make any sense.""

"Meraki MX is an expensive solution."

"The product’s pricing depends on the discount Cisco gives to different people."

"Meraki MX's pricing is cheaper as compared to Cisco's standalone products."

"Meraki is also expensive, but it's a little bit less expensive and it's easier to configure than Cisco ASA."

"It is more expensive than other solutions, but it is a cloud-managed network solution and support is given at the moment you call. That give a very big plus."

More Cisco Meraki MX pricing and cost advice

"The pricing could be better."

"The price of this solution and the price of support are ok."

"For mid-sized companies, they sell their appliances for good prices."

"We bought a three-year license, and we renew it whenever it expires. The price could be better. It's always very expensive."

"The SN200 series costs between $500 USD and $600 USD per year, whereas the SN700 series costs approximately $1,000 annually."

"We chose Stormshield for its price, as the Azure firewall was too expensive."

"I think the price is good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department

We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...

See all answers

Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki MX?

I find the pricing for Cisco Meraki MX reasonable and competitive given the features provided and the target market. I believe it is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stormshield Network Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Stormshield Network Security?

I already use Stormshield Network Security, and I am now looking for a new solution. I am already working with Stormshield Network Security, and the official reseller of Stormshield.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Stormshield Network Security?

The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive. Palo Alto and others are much more expensive, but Stormshield Network Security is also not inexpensive. My overall review rating fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 33% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 4% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki MX Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 14% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 8% of the time

OPNsense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Stormshield Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX

November 2026

Download Cisco Meraki MX product report

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Network Security

October 2026

Download Stormshield Network Security product report

Also Known As

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600

NETASQ Firewalls

Overview

Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized management for network security and SD-WAN, featuring advanced threat protection, VPN capabilities, and seamless integration with other Cisco products. It enhances operational efficiency through cloud management and intuitive interface.

Cisco Meraki MX is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly cloud management platform that provides real-time insights through a centralized dashboard. It includes AutoVPN for secure remote connections and advanced threat protection to ensure consistent policy enforcement. Its integration capabilities with Cisco products streamline network administration. Users highlight the need for improvements in advanced reporting, detailed alerts, and enhanced API flexibility. Cost concerns are noted, alongside desires for better security analytics and improved customer support.

What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?

Centralized Dashboard: Provides real-time network insights.
User-friendly Cloud Management: Simplifies network administration.
Advanced Threat Protection: Ensures consistent policy enforcement.
AutoVPN: Simplifies secure remote connections.
Easy Configuration and Deployment: Enhances operational efficiency.

What benefits should be expected from Cisco Meraki MX?

Efficient Network Control: Streamlines management across sites.
Secure Internet Access: Provides advanced protection features.
Seamless Integration: Enhances user experience with other Cisco products.
Improved Connectivity: Facilitates remote troubleshooting and secure connections.

Cisco Meraki MX is implemented in industries like telecommunications and healthcare for secure network management and centralized control. It supports zero-touch deployment, dynamic routing, and traffic shaping, making it ideal for ISPs and multi-site environments, as well as managing Wi-Fi networks and guest security for wireless users.

Cisco

Stormshield Network Security offers comprehensive protection with features like backup inspection, scalable interface, and load balancing, suitable for network security management.

Stormshield Network Security is designed for organizations requiring reliable IT infrastructure protection, providing firewall capabilities, intrusion detection, and application control. Users find VPN support, URL filtering, and UTM functions beneficial for network management. Models like SN200 and SN910 are used globally in clustered configurations, addressing different demands. Challenges include pricing, interface friendliness, filtering configurations, and technical support.

What are the key features of Stormshield Network Security?

Backup Inspection: Enhances reliability and recovery options.
Antivirus Controls: Provides robust virus protection.
Intrusion Detection: Alerts on potential threats.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic efficiently.
URL Filtering: Blocks malicious websites for safe browsing.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Adapts to each organization's growing needs.
Reliability: Supports clustered configurations for uptime.
Management Ease: Intuitive dashboard aids network oversight.
Performance: High throughput with efficient clustering.

Stormshield Network Security is widely implemented in industries needing IT infrastructure protection, like finance or healthcare. Organizations deploy it in data centers or branch offices, benefiting from features ensuring safety and performance. The tool supports environments that demand high security levels and robust network monitoring.

Stormshield

Sample Customers

Hyatt, ONS

ACESUR group, Ministry of Education Oman, Anios Laboratories, Zain, DLM Location

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

October 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security report.

See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.