Cisco Meraki MX vs Stormshield Network Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Stormshield are both solutions in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category. Cisco is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5, while Stormshield is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 8.3% mindshare in UTMU, compared to Stormshield’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Stormshield users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki MX

Read 80 Cisco Meraki MX reviews

13,687 Views
4,654 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Stormshield Network Security

Read 18 Stormshield Network Security reviews

3,966 Views
1,785 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MX

Stormshield Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Stormshield Network Security and Cisco Meraki MX compete in the network security space, each with distinct advantages. Cisco Meraki MX seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and cloud management capabilities, appealing to those in need of a flexible security solution.

Features: Stormshield Network Security provides comprehensive threat protection through features like the Stormshield Analyzer, object group-based firewalling, and robust security integration. Meraki MX offers a cloud management platform, auto VPN capabilities for remote workers, and advanced security features like threat detection and traffic shaping.

Room for Improvement: Stormshield could benefit from a more intuitive user interface, enhanced scalability, and improved cloud integration. Meraki MX might improve by offering more budget-friendly pricing, expanding firmware support, and enhancing customization options for specific enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki MX is favored for its ease of deployment and cloud-based management, making it simple for IT teams to deploy remotely. Stormshield may have a steeper learning curve, but it compensates with robust customer support, ensuring help is readily available for troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Stormshield Network Security is often more budget-friendly, appealing to those with immediate budget constraints. Cisco Meraki MX, while more expensive initially, is seen as providing substantial ROI through sophisticated features and scalability, making it an attractive long-term investment for businesses looking to integrate cloud management with security.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki MX

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewalls (10th)

Stormshield Network Security

Ranking in Unified Threat Management (UTM)

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Unified Threat Management (UTM) category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki MX is 8.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stormshield Network Security is 3.7%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Unified Threat Management (UTM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki MX	8.3%
Stormshield Network Security	3.7%
Other	88.0%

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

Featured Reviews

Md Rafique

it support at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized security management has simplified daily monitoring and remote troubleshooting

One area that could be improved is providing more advanced reporting and analytics within the dashboard, especially more detailed historical data and customizable reports. It would also be useful to have greater flexibility for advanced firewall and security configuration without making the interface more complex. Better customization and more detailed troubleshooting information would also help administrators. Another improvement would be more granular control over alerts and notifications, so administrators can prioritize critical security and network events without being overwhelmed by less important alerts. More detailed historical analysis and easier integration with third-party security and monitoring tools would also be valuable. Overall, I would keep the simplicity of the Meraki dashboard while adding more advanced options for administrators who need deeper control and visibility. One additional improvement would be better support for integration with third-party security and monitoring platforms. More flexible APIs, deeper SIEM integration, and more detailed security analytics would make Cisco Meraki MX even more useful for organizations with a broader security stack, while the simplicity and centralized management are already strong points.

Read full review

Zsolt Jónás

System Administrator at NaxoNet

Advanced GUI and layered security have supported compliance and simplified intrusion prevention

I haven't had a task that I couldn't solve with Stormshield Network Security. The active-active high availability solution would be beneficial because currently, if you build a high availability solution with Stormshield Network Security, you have a main device and another one is a backup device. The HA can switch between them, but it would be good to have a master-master solution, not just a master-slave one. I could set a URL that I can call to update the DNS record. Currently, Stormshield Network Security devices support DynDNS, which is not a usual feature request from a server environment. I have my own solution instead of DynDNS because I don't prefer it, so I have my own service for that. However, the GUI does not support using a custom service instead of DynDNS. I had to solve it in the console on Stormshield Network Security device, but it would be much better if it was reachable on the GUI. I had to figure out a trick for the IPsec configuration. In the IPsec config, we have to provide the remote side's IP address, but it's always changing. This means that an office, for example a company that has an office but without a fixed IP address, cannot be used with IPsec VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We work also with domain control (DC) from Microsoft or Amazon. We use a whole virtual appliance with Meraki."

"I've been in this industry for 40 years and this is the simplest and easiest product that I've ever used."

"Maintaining firewalls will never be joyful, but Meraki has made the quality of life for someone who has to maintain a firewall much better."

"By increasing these user experiences, productivity has been enhanced across companies and client employees."

"Dual WAN connections are greatly simplified and point-to-point VPNs automatically connect regardless of what WAN connection is active."

"Site to Site VPN: The device can establish a VPN connection to multiple sites in a mesh environment in seconds, and without complex VPN knowledge."

"I believe it is one of the best networking solutions available."

"Both Meraki and Aerohive are good products, and I prefer Meraki."

More Cisco Meraki MX pros

"It's an easy, straightforward management platform to use."

"The multi-layered security approach of Stormshield Network Security is a good one and has helped with compliance."

"The solution has improved my organization because I can see what traffic is happening and I can use it to block and prevent attacks."

"This solution is quick and easy to configure."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its dashboard, which helps you manage different aspects of a single page. The intrusion detection system helps our organization by automatically detecting and responding to potential threats. It operates similarly to Darktrace, which detects and responds automatically based on the security rules you apply. Initially, you configure everything to block, and then you can whitelist specific items as needed."

"This product has improved the way our organization functions."

"I like that it works fine. Stormshield is a very good solution."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

More Stormshield Network Security pros

Cons

"Data is the only path, so optimization is essential."

"They need to improve the user interface because it is a little clumsy."

"From a subscription base or price perspective, there's some room for improvement. They also need more security features."

"Sometimes you want a little bit more control, and you don't have that control with Meraki MX."

"The security is not as strong as it could be"

"For this solution, Meraki is still more expensive than FortiGate. The FortiGate license is still less than the Meraki license."

"The hardware solution for Cisco Meraki MX comes with a higher price."

"I have faced some issues with Cisco Meraki MX, especially maybe it is an upgrade or out of date or out of support issue."

More Cisco Meraki MX cons

"The biggest issue was their support department was not able to help us, then everything stops. This is a no-go area for me."

"Being more cost effective. I went with a pair of Watchguard M300 recently when buying a new firewall cluster for our own use because it was way cheaper than NetASQ/Stormshield N700 while being faster, and it offers true multi-master firewall clustering if needed."

"The main area of this product that has room for improvement is pricing. Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

"Support is always an issue because they're constantly busy."

"The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive."

"The filtering configuration could be better. We have some difficulties with the filtering configuration and the filter extension. It's not that easy. It's not that straightforward. In the next release, I would like to see a reporting system. Stormshield doesn't have any tutorials on how to do the configuration and things like that. They just have documentation on the website. If you want to configure, for example, Cisco or Fortinet, you can find tutorials on YouTube. They show you how to configure the features, and so on. In Stormshield, there is nothing on social media or the internet on how to configure different things. The lack of documentation or the lack of material makes it difficult for others to adopt this solution."

"Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

"This is not a next-generation firewall."

More Stormshield Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing cost could be better."

"The solution is expensive compared to other vendors but you can get good discounts if you know the account manager. The product is less expensive than a normal Cisco subscription. The tool's hardware warranty is a lifetime but you need to purchase support which comes in three, five, and seven years subscriptions."

"Meraki MX's pricing is cheaper as compared to Cisco's standalone products."

"It is more expensive than other solutions, but it is a cloud-managed network solution and support is given at the moment you call. That give a very big plus."

"The license cost depends on the box. We acquired a different product line. We are dealing with MX appliance now, that is, MX6, MX54, MX100, MX250, MX450. Every box has got an identity, and it has got its own specification. Every box has got a different license fee. We deployed Meraki MX in UAE when it was not a mature product. We took a risk, but we were successful. We saved a huge amount of money after implementing and removing all the MPLS and leased lines. We got a broadband connection because Meraki MX could work on a broadband connection. We have drastically saved a very good amount of money, which was one of the successful things apart from the successful solution."

"The pricing could always be improved — especially with the shape the economy is in at the moment."

"capabilities" What is our primary use case? The solution is mainly based on the cloud which is highly adaptable to the needs of its users due to its large user base. By employing over fifty VPS, we strategically position these units where clients require them the most. Remarkably, the cost of this setup is notably more affordable compared to competing alternatives. The management dashboard allows users to oversee each branch within their network. This comprehensive view is unified within the dashboard, offering insights into the entire branch network. The system works mostly for financial institutions, particularly banking clients. What is most valuable? The cloud management system is really valuable. What needs improvement? Direct logging is something that can be introduced. In the absence of cloud management, the possibility of local configurations and on-premise logins becomes restricted. This limitation stands as a primary concern. When it comes to resolving issues, the inability to access login options hampers troubleshooting efforts. The stability is noteworthy; but when compared to alternative products, its stability is comparatively lower. Additionally, certain limitations are observed in terms of remote control. Price-wise, the solution stands out for its competitive and cost-effective nature compared to other alternatives. Operationally, it is user-friendly and requires minimal effort from administrators, making configuration hassle-free. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Meraki MX for the last three years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable however there are issues and we need to reboot sometimes. I would rate it five out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Considering the needs of medium-class clients, scalability proves to be highly advantageous. I would rate it nine out of ten. How was the initial setup? The initial setup is easy via the cloud portal, primarily because managed support is needed for internet access. Without this, the direct configuration of the box becomes unattainable.The duration required is significantly shorter compared to alternatives. Occasionally, when dealing with a larger number of branches, like fifty or more, we managed to complete the implementation within 14 days. In cases involving complex processes and discussions, additional time might be necessary. However, once the system is set up and connected to the cloud, other configurations can be done within an eight-hour timeframe. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The solution has three licenses; enterprise, security, and SD WAN. This subscription-based method aligns with customer requirements. When procuring hardware, the minimum requirement is the enterprise license, granting access to cloud management and the portal. Customers can opt to acquire the security or SD-WAN licenses if needed. This adaptable pricing model offers great flexibility. All licenses are linked to the device count, proving advantageous for customers. If there's a future demand for additional devices, licenses can be expanded accordingly without any concerns. The flexibility of the licensing system is indeed valuable."

"In my country, the product is cheap compared to the UK because of the differences in taxes."

More Cisco Meraki MX pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution and the price of support are ok."

"We chose Stormshield for its price, as the Azure firewall was too expensive."

"I think the price is good."

"The SN200 series costs between $500 USD and $600 USD per year, whereas the SN700 series costs approximately $1,000 annually."

"The pricing could be better."

"We bought a three-year license, and we renew it whenever it expires. The price could be better. It's always very expensive."

"For mid-sized companies, they sell their appliances for good prices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Fortigate 60d vs. Meraki MX67 for a small company without a dedicated IT Department

We have Meraki Mx devices now, we are looking to replace them. But that is because the Meraki MX platform lacks SSL Inspection, Granular Firewall rules (Block only, no allow setting), client vpn re...

See all answers

Which is better - Meraki MX or Cisco ASA Firewall?

Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki MX?

I find the pricing for Cisco Meraki MX reasonable and competitive given the features provided and the target market. I believe it is acceptable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stormshield Network Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Stormshield Network Security?

I already use Stormshield Network Security, and I am now looking for a new solution. I am already working with Stormshield Network Security, and the official reseller of Stormshield.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Stormshield Network Security?

The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive. Palo Alto and others are much more expensive, but Stormshield Network Security is also not inexpensive. My overall review rating fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 30% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 6% of the time

Sophos Firewall vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 5% of the time

SonicWall TZ vs Cisco Meraki MX

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki MX Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 16% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 8% of the time

OPNsense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

More Stormshield Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX

September 2026

Download Cisco Meraki MX product report

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Network Security

August 2026

Download Stormshield Network Security product report

Also Known As

MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600

NETASQ Firewalls

Overview

Cisco Meraki MX offers cloud-managed security with user-friendly setup and efficient management, enhancing VPN and firewall functionalities for businesses.

Cisco Meraki MX is known for its robust cloud-based network management, featuring AutoVPN, SD-WAN, and advanced security. Its centralized control over firewall, traffic shaping, and monitoring ensures excellent connectivity and security. The interface allows easy management by non-technical staff, offering remote access and seamless network performance through real-time alerts and troubleshooting. It supports global connectivity with minimal effort, addressing needs across small to enterprise environments. Despite its strengths, users point out areas needing improvement like load balancing, VPN features, more flexible logging, and session capabilities. Pricing, integration limits, and licensing need enhancement.

What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?

AutoVPN: Enables automatic VPN configuration for secure, site-to-site connections.
SD-WAN: Optimizes traffic routes for increased performance and reliability.
Advanced Security: Offers unified threat management, intrusion prevention, and content filtering.
Centralized Management: Simplifies operations with remote monitoring and configuration.
Traffic Shaping: Prioritizes critical business applications to maximize performance.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Deployment: Simplified installation reduces setup time and cost.
Real-Time Alerts: Ensures proactive issue identification and resolution.
Scalability: Supports growth with seamless integration and management of multiple sites.
Global Connectivity: Maintains efficient connections across geographic locations with minimal effort.

In industries like retail, finance, and education, Cisco Meraki MX provides enhanced security and connectivity. Retail chains benefit from easy VPN setups for secure multi-site networking, while educational institutions find value in its ability to manage large campuses efficiently. Financial services leverage its robust security features to protect sensitive data, ensuring compliance and trust.

Cisco

Stormshield Network Security offers comprehensive protection with features like backup inspection, scalable interface, and load balancing, suitable for network security management.

Stormshield Network Security is designed for organizations requiring reliable IT infrastructure protection, providing firewall capabilities, intrusion detection, and application control. Users find VPN support, URL filtering, and UTM functions beneficial for network management. Models like SN200 and SN910 are used globally in clustered configurations, addressing different demands. Challenges include pricing, interface friendliness, filtering configurations, and technical support.

What are the key features of Stormshield Network Security?

Backup Inspection: Enhances reliability and recovery options.
Antivirus Controls: Provides robust virus protection.
Intrusion Detection: Alerts on potential threats.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic efficiently.
URL Filtering: Blocks malicious websites for safe browsing.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Adapts to each organization's growing needs.
Reliability: Supports clustered configurations for uptime.
Management Ease: Intuitive dashboard aids network oversight.
Performance: High throughput with efficient clustering.

Stormshield Network Security is widely implemented in industries needing IT infrastructure protection, like finance or healthcare. Organizations deploy it in data centers or branch offices, benefiting from features ensuring safety and performance. The tool supports environments that demand high security levels and robust network monitoring.

Stormshield

Sample Customers

Hyatt, ONS

ACESUR group, Ministry of Education Oman, Anios Laboratories, Zain, DLM Location

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki MX vs. Stormshield Network Security report.

See our list of best Unified Threat Management (UTM) vendors and best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.