Cisco Intersight vs Infraon IMS comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and EverestIMS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while EverestIMS is ranked #57. Cisco holds a 1.6% mindshare in IM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 22 Cisco Intersight reviews

7,703 Views
5,392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

4,007 Views
2,524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Cisco Intersight and Infraon IMS compete in the IT operations management category. Cisco Intersight seems to have the upper hand due to its integration with Cisco environments, while Infraon IMS is more versatile with a broader feature set.

Features: Cisco Intersight offers advanced infrastructure management, seamless integration with Cisco’s ecosystem, and cloud-based operational efficiency. Infraon IMS provides extensive monitoring tools, user-centric ITSM features, and scalability across large enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Intersight could enhance its support for non-Cisco environments, optimize its pricing structure, and improve user interface intuitiveness. Infraon IMS can focus on deeper integration with existing hardware ecosystems, expanding third-party support, and refining its analytics capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Intersight provides cloud-first deployment that simplifies setup for existing customers, with strong support and consistent updates. Infraon IMS offers deployment options on-premises and hybrid cloud models, with responsive customer service providing customizable solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Intersight involves higher setup costs but delivers significant ROI within Cisco's ecosystem. Infraon IMS presents competitive pricing options aimed at flexibility and broader applicability, often resulting in better investment returns due to its comprehensive offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (5th)

Infraon IMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

57th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (84th), Server Monitoring (32nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (50th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco Intersight is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Intersight	1.6%
Infraon IMS	0.9%
Other	97.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

AbhinavSingh

Technical Marketing Engineer Hybrid Cloud Infrastructures at NetApp

Centralized policies have simplified hybrid operations and now support automated workflows

The challenge could be if there are any bugs. Most of the time, you may feel that the TCAM resources are getting full on the Nexus just because of some bug or the configuration is not supported. Or sometimes, if there are any vulnerabilities happening on the current running firmware, those are challenges we have. And if you talk about from the compute side, there were initial bugs such as a CPU throttle issue. Because of that, the chassis was not running in an optimum way. You may see performance issues during that time. For that, Cisco released a patch, and it got fixed. I think Cisco Intersight should allow more automation capabilities. It should be more open, and it should provide more automation capabilities. I think there is also a scope of making it a little bit simpler because a lot of policy and config sometimes becomes confusing for the user because it has a lot of config. Maybe they can do a little bit of simplification with Cisco Intersight.

Read full review

it_user1734441

Networking Head at Birla Corporation Ltd

Good statistical reporting, provides alerts via email, helpful support

The reporting capabilities are good. We have to manually configure reports based on what data we require. For example, it can show the downtime for uptime for a device. Once we configure the profile for each report, we can download it. We use Infraon to automatically trigger processes to help resolve issues when they are detected. For example, it will automatically raise a ticket and send an email to our ISP when it detects that a link is down. When a process is triggered automatically, we run one of the pre-configured scripts. We have not created any of the scripts ourselves but rather, only use the ones that are provided. These scripts are important because we use them for generating reports and emailing alerts, which are also used for auditing purposes. For example, our IT department has been improved because Infraon automatically creates reports that show our site uptime and downtime. We can see which site has more bandwidth utilization, link utilization, and link problems. It will show us what other devices are in the environment, which ones we need to replace, and how many sessions are being created. This solution assists us with our billing because we have many critical locations, and these need to have one hundred percent uptime, every month of the year. We generate reports monthly, quarterly, and yearly, which we then submit to management to cite the total uptime. Based on this, the billing is done. With respect to the learning curve, this tool is easy to learn because there is a lot of training material included. I suggest that the entire team learn to use it, rather than just one person, because it will make the tool more effective for the organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the integrations to be the most valuable feature."

"We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one."

"Intersight offers many features that provide great value to companies."

"This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool."

"Provides an overall view using a single portal."

"The features enable you to abstract the server personality away from the hardware, similar to the B-Series."

"Cisco Intersight has positively impacted my organization by providing more automation and less manual work, as everything can be automatic after registration to Cisco Intersight and offering more visibility as well."

"What I like best about Cisco Intersight is the way it's developing and converging into everything that the cloud has to offer, e.g. it's converging into one platform which is good."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"Infraon IMS allows us to do several things from a single window, which is important to us."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed."

"The usability must be better."

"In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage."

"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."

"The solution needs some enhancement in order to build the cluster in two nodes."

"The product could be easy to use, similar to CloudIQ."

"Cisco Intersight is a stable product, but it needs some improvement."

"I believe Cisco Intersight's licensing is quite expensive for a public healthcare environment, and I would like to see lower prices for us."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is cost-effective."

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed. At the moment it does have a basic integration of Pure Storage, so I can add my Pure Storage if I ha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

My main use case for Cisco Intersight is to register our Cisco UCS servers and apply profiles to our servers with configurations, firmware deployment automatically, and install the operating system...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Intersight?

I would rate Cisco Intersight a nine out of ten. I give it a nine because personally, I think it is one of the best management tools ever. I have worked before with different server vendors and dif...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 39% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 4% of the time

Cisco UCS Director vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 7% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 4% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Infraon IMS

Compared 3% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

October 2026

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

September 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

Intersight

Everest IMS

Overview

Cisco Intersight delivers advanced data center management with cloud integration, remote server scaling, and predictive analytics, promoting efficient infrastructure management. It supports hybrid environments and is suitable for scaling across enterprises.

Cisco Intersight offers a comprehensive view of data centers with seamless cloud platform integration, enhancing manageability across environments. It is known for workflow automation, inventory management, and predictive analysis, allowing users to optimize workloads. Users leverage its scalability and ease of use, with features that aid in remote management and integration with both Cisco and non-Cisco products. However, improvements are needed in usability, automation, and third-party tool integration, especially for on-premises and hybrid cloud management. Users often face challenges with firmware management and transitioning from UCS Manager. Desired enhancements include better software compatibility, third-party integrations, expanded microservices support, enhanced AI features, and more automation capabilities, addressing setup complexity, support, and high maintenance costs.

What are the main features of Cisco Intersight?

Data Center Management: Provides insights into data centers with comprehensive monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Enables integration with cloud platforms for enhanced workflows.
Remote Management: Facilitates remote management of data center environments.
Predictive Analytics: Offers analysis tools for workload optimization and planning.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with enterprise infrastructure needs.

What are the expected benefits of using Cisco Intersight?

Improved Infrastructure Management: Offers tools for efficient management across environments.
Enhanced Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automation capabilities.
Cost-Effective Operations: Promotes efficiency and reduces maintenance costs.
Comprehensive Integration: Supports seamless integration with diverse platforms and technologies.
Performance Optimization: Utilizes predictive analytics for optimizing system performance.

In industries where data center management and integration are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Cisco Intersight is used to monitor and manage infrastructure across multiple sites. Its capability to combine platforms like HyperFlex and VMware allows organizations to maintain hardware status effectively, supporting both on-premises and cloud environments for efficient service delivery.

Cisco

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS

September 2026

Free Report: Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Intersight vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.