"We only use the basic features and we find that it works well."
"Being able to deal with multiple VLANs to segment the network logically is the biggest feature for us. The management of these switches is okay for us. These switches work very well, and they meet our needs."
"Its performance and reliability are valuable."
"Very stable solution with a very low failure rate."
"The security of the switches is pretty impressive. There are many security features available on the product."
"The main features of this solution are performance and ease of use."
"Multicast is a great feature of this product."
"These switches are both stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Junos operating system."
"The solution is easy to use and has good integration."
"I like the simplicity of it."
"It has features that allow us to go back to previous configurations."
"You willuse almost every feature on every switch to some degree because the utility is valuable."
"It's easy to use."
"The virtual Chassis feature for stacking is good in general, with high bandwidth for the link, which is good."
"Both Juniper and Cisco switches are interoperable."
"The price could be better."
"Cisco Ethernet Switches is a very expensive solution."
"They can make the licensing model a little easier."
"There could be an improvement in the licensing by reducing the price of the different types, such as essential, advantage, and premium."
"The typical areas of concern for Cisco Ethernet Switches are not technical but cost including support costs. I’ve never liked the fact that end users cannot download security patches without a support contract. I’ve had trouble getting approval to renew Cisco support contracts due to the cost."
"Cisco is not user-friendly. It would be best if you had a technical expert. The graphical user interface is more like a command line, and most functionalities are on the command line."
"You have to be Cisco-certified to work on Cisco products, so we can't get into Cisco to do even basic configurations."
"The GUI is not that easy."
"The management tools are limited in their abilities, and suffer from upgrade problems."
"Some areas of technical support could be better."
"Its distribution channel and the ease of availability should be improved."
"I have found the scalability could be improved in the version I was using."
"The configuration could be made simpler."
"The updates are constantly breaking."
"The management platforms for the network need improvement."
"The initial setup of switches is not that simple."
Cisco Ethernet Switches is ranked 1st in Ethernet Switches with 60 reviews while Juniper Ethernet Switches is ranked 4th in Ethernet Switches with 22 reviews. Cisco Ethernet Switches is rated 8.6, while Juniper Ethernet Switches is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Ethernet Switches writes "Stable and scalable solution for all business sizes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper Ethernet Switches writes "Flexible admin features and has good firewall filters". Cisco Ethernet Switches is most compared with NETGEAR Switches, Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access, D-Link Ethernet Switches, Brocade Ethernet Switches and Aruba Switches, whereas Juniper Ethernet Switches is most compared with Aruba Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Ubiquiti UniFi Switches, Meraki MS Switches and HPE Ethernet Switches. See our Cisco Ethernet Switches vs. Juniper Ethernet Switches report.
See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.
We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
