ScienceLogic and Cisco DNA Center are strong competitors in the IT infrastructure monitoring and network management domain. ScienceLogic has the upper hand in deployment flexibility and customer service, while Cisco DNA Center excels in network integrations with its familiar infrastructure.
Features: ScienceLogic offers highly customizable dashboards, diverse integration options, and a multi-tenant environment, enhancing infrastructure monitoring versatility. Cisco DNA Center shines in network management with simplified automation features, strong integration with Cisco devices, and outstanding security and analytics capabilities.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic requires an improved reporting module, enhanced API capabilities, and a more intuitive user interface to address learning barriers. Cisco DNA Center's challenges include high pricing, limited third-party integration, and a complex user interface that could benefit from simplification to broaden compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is efficiently deployed across on-premises and cloud environments, with superior technical support offering quick and comprehensive problem-solving. Cisco DNA Center, while also supporting on-premises and hybrid deployments, often requires additional assistance due to its complexity, with users noting the need for improved support and integrations.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's flexible licensing can become costly with more devices, yet users find ROI justified through improved monitoring and reduced incident management time. Cisco DNA Center is perceived as expensive due to comprehensive licensing and appliance costs, offering significant benefits for large network management but potentially deterring smaller businesses. Both platforms report positive ROI, with ScienceLogic benefiting from deployment flexibility and Cisco DNA Center favored by enterprises with extensive Cisco products.
Although Cisco DNA Center is expensive, we have seen a return on investment in terms of time savings.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
Overall, Cisco DNA Center rates eight out of ten as a complete solution.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
The solution is designed for large enterprise companies.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
The AI-driven insights have contributed significantly to faster troubleshooting and predictive analytics.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
It could be cheaper.
The most valuable features include AI-driven insights which make troubleshooting much easier.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Cisco DNA Center offers a comprehensive platform for network automation and management, providing detailed analytics, enhanced security, and streamlined operations for both wired and wireless networks.
Cisco DNA Center integrates with Cisco infrastructure to deliver efficient network automation and management, helping organizations improve network visibility, security, and control. It supports AI-driven analytics and automated workflows to enhance operational efficiency and reduce errors. Challenges include compatibility with third-party systems, steep learning curve, and complex deployment. Its interface facilitates centralized control, vital for troubleshooting, policy management, and configuration management, with support for zero-touch provisioning and SD-Access.
What are the key features of Cisco DNA Center?In sectors such as healthcare, finance, and retail, Cisco DNA Center is utilized for its ability to enhance security and compliance, manage large-scale networks, and provide detailed analytics for better operational decision-making. Its support for location tracking and policy automation ensures efficient network management across diverse environments.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
