Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Meraki SD-WAN vs VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Featured Reviews

Igor Van Den Ouden - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables secure and flexible branch connectivity with application-aware routing
The valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN include its security policies and zone-based firewall that are applied to every site, as well as application-aware routing. Security is standard compliant, eliminating config drift that was prevalent before manual configurations. Application-aware routing offers flexibility in using different lines for traffic, depending on the policy implemented.
Premnath Jaganathan - PeerSpot reviewer
Manage enterprise network traffic seamlessly but security features need enhancement
The security integration in Meraki SD-WAN is not as good as the competition, such as Fortinet. Customers are moving away due to this reason, as Meraki lacks in offering advanced security features, which is crucial for many enterprise clients. Cisco's AI capabilities and Meraki are about seventy percent caught up with competitors like Juniper Mist in terms of AI integration.
Aneesh K - PeerSpot reviewer
Even a small group of people can manage a large environment and easy to manage
I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten with ten being easy. Our hardware is ready, ISP is ready. I can bring up the site in just five to ten minutes. We use it for both on-prem and cloud, but they may have to make some improvements for the cloud. Currently, the cloud gateway has some bandwidth limitations. It cannot support more than 1.5 gigabytes. That's a challenge because, with the cloud, we expect more traffic. So, the capacity of each gateway could be a challenge. We use it for the cloud, but on-prem, it's perfect. Maybe for the cloud, they need to make some improvements.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, I rate Cisco SD-WAN as nine out of ten."
"Application-aware routing offers flexibility in using different lines for traffic, depending on the policy implemented."
"The solution is great at aggregating the traffic and then sending it in one direction."
"It's very easy to manage and monitor the network's health and security using the solution."
"With other routing protocols, we have had to send team members to perform installations and configurations. There is a lot of work involved. However with SD-WAN, once it is installed it is fully automated, and we can do all other tasks remotely. We don't have to send staff out to the client's location. It's very independent, and we can establish SD-WAN connectivity easily. It is secure as well."
"You get security, all of the service you need, and it's easy to deploy."
"Troubleshooting is swift, allowing for fast turnaround times whenever we encounter an issue."
"It's a complete solution with many security features."
"It is easy to monitor and manage."
"The Meraki interface is really well driven and very mature."
"This is a high availability solution that is easy to configure and has a nice GUI."
"Meraki SD-WAN is a very stable and scalable solution with good technical support."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature for me is the security functionality."
"The dashboard is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The dashboard is user-friendly. It's very simple to use."
"Initially, we had a scattered environment, but VMware SD-WAN helped us achieve centralization, which was beneficial."
"VMware has been chosen by many of our customers who do not want to do a lot of complex routing in their environment and want a very easy-to-use solution. The most valuable features are simple troubleshooting, Dynamic Multipath Optimization (DMPO), and cybersecurity."
"The most valuable feature is load balancing."
"Increases the performance of applications and is easy to deploy."
"VMware SD-WAN is easy-to-use."
"We define the quality of service layer to improve their application service experience globally."
"If one circuit crashes, we are able to switch to a second circuit without any disruption in connection."
"It's easy to deploy and manage. Even a small group of people can manage a large environment. It's stable, easy to deploy, easy to install—all the stuff."
 

Cons

"Cisco's router and voice gateway has not been available since the launch of SD-WAN."
"It is expensive."
"We don't have any issues with this solution other than the price."
"The product's application delivery feature needs improvement."
"Cisco SD-WAN is not as easy to deploy as the Meraki and FortiGate solutions. The zero-touch deployment could be a lot better. The deployment and initial setup are complicated and could be better."
"The main area for improvement in Cisco SD-WAN is the lack of documentation, which often lags behind the software releases."
"The solution should not be so bound to ISPs."
"I would like to see a better, web-based interface to make changes to the configuration or to view statistics."
"In Meraki SD-WAN, we have some limitations with the traffic shaping capabilities."
"Meraki SD-WAN could improve on the lead time, but this is not a problem only with Cisco. there's a global shortage of chipsets. Additionally, the solution has limited features. It's quite a standard product and not very easily upgradeable or stackable."
"We have a lot of problems with distribution. The late deliveries likely have to do with the time it takes for the fabrication of components. It is a principal problem at this moment."
"Perimetral security for new requirements on financial networks and DRP systems, like SAP."
"The solution is scalable for mid-tier deployments, but not for major ones."
"This vendor has issues with the supply chain that need to be improved."
"I'm not too familiar with the Meraki environment, but I suppose more automation is always a good thing."
"People are struggling a little bit with the lead times right now. It’s hard to actually get the hardware."
"There might be potential enhancements in better integration with other platforms, increased stability, and heightened security."
"In an upcoming release, the solution can be more functional and have additional features."
"This solution can be improved by integrating other security solutions."
"I would like to see more features added to increase visibility."
"Some of the service providers that use VeloCloud as their SD-WAN should be enabled to have better global visibility."
"The solution needs improvement on security features and should include two firewalls. Cloud VPN can’t support any link. The solution needs to also improve the availability of centralized internal management. It needs to have debug detection and Deep Packet Detection features as well. The documentation for VMware is also hard to find."
"The security of the firewall should be improved. It would be a good idea to have a standalone product with better security."
"It needs better security."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is reasonable. I would rate the price as seven out of ten."
"The price of Cisco SD-WAN could improve, it is expensive. The cost of the solution is approximately 30 percent higher than competitors."
"For 600 links, the license for Cisco SD-WAN costs us US$250k a year."
"The cost of Cisco SD-WAN is high and has room for improvement compared to competitors such as Fortinet which has similar functionality."
"Cisco SD-WAN is more expensive than its competitors."
"Cost-wise, Cisco SD-WAN is comparatively high."
"In the Russian market where we operate, this solution is expensive."
"The solution is quite expensive so it is important to enhance its cost efficiency."
"I am not aware of the licensing fees."
"The price of Meraki SD-WAN could improve, it is expensive when compared to other solutions on the market, such as Aruba."
"This solution is more expensive than competitors."
"One of the most valuable aspects of Meraki SD-WAN is the price. It is highly cost-effective."
"The tool is costly. I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten since it is very expensive."
"If you purchase a Meeraki box, you have to purchase a license, and it's already the basic license, you will have you SD-WAN included."
"Our clients pay Meraki an annual licensing fee and the pricing is not too bad when compared to other products in the Cisco portfolio."
"The solution is a bit expensive when compared to other products."
"Overall pricing could be lower. It is much more expensive than traditional hardware vendor pricing."
"The solution's price combines the license and the bandwidth you used."
"The price of the solution could be reduced."
"We pay about $500 USD, or 700,000 Korean won."
"The licensing model of VMware SD-WAN could be improved, it is not always that competitive. The biggest concern is to be competitive against other solutions. However, the way that the licensing model is designed is not corresponding to the real use cases of my customers."
"The price of VMware SD-WAN is less expensive than some solutions, such as Cisco."
"There is only a standard fee for the solution."
"The cost of VMware SD-WAN is high, but I think you can still get better pricing if your volume is high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco SD-WAN?
When considering the most valuable features of Cisco SD-WAN, the decoupling of self-monitoring stands out significant...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco SD-WAN?
The pricing of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is rated between eight and nine out of ten, where ten is the most expensive.
What needs improvement with Cisco SD-WAN?
There's nothing I could put my finger on right away for improvements in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. There is definitely no...
What do you like most about Meraki SD-WAN?
The auto VPN feature is important because it automates many tasks, making things simpler and faster. It helps with se...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Meraki SD-WAN?
The price is a little bit higher than local vendors, for example, Huawei ZTE or H3C. However, some customers require ...
What needs improvement with Meraki SD-WAN?
They have to ask us many questions about configurations. It could be improved with some automation to trigger, for ex...
What are the biggest differences between Fortinet Fortigate and VMware SD-WAN?
One of our favorite things about Fortinet Fortigate is that you can deploy on the cloud or on premises. It is a very ...
What do you like most about VMware SD-WAN?
One of the key use cases for VMware SD-WAN was assisting a customer in the industrial zone. They required virtualized...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware SD-WAN?
The pricing involves licensing for the VeloCloud gateway based on the bandwidth used. The license is required to use ...
 

Also Known As

Cisco SD-WAN
No data available
VMware SD-WAN, VeloCloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Doyle Research, Ashton Metzler & Associates
École Jeannine Manuel
Redmond, Coca Cola, Roka Bioscience, MetTel, Deutsche Telekom, Rockford Construction,  The Bay Club, tru Independence, Triton Management Services, DevCon, AXPM
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Fortinet and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: May 2025.
855,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.