No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CircleCI vs Incredibuild comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (17th)
Incredibuild
Ranking in Build Automation
27th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 4.1%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Incredibuild is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CircleCI4.1%
Incredibuild1.4%
Other94.5%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Automated pipelines have accelerated microservice delivery and improve release consistency
Debugging is an important point for improvement because when pipelines fail, debugging can sometimes be difficult, especially for the complex workflows which we have already faced in our organization in different projects. Logs are available, but root cause analysis can take time, so that can be improved. Also, configuration management challenges exist. Although YAML configuration is flexible, it can become complex and hard to maintain as pipelines grow in size and include multiple workflow conditions. The limited visibility for large pipelines is also a concern. For very large enterprise pipelines, the UI can feel less intuitive in terms of tracking dependencies and understanding the full workflow at a glance. Cost optimization is one important point for improvement. In cloud-based usage, costs can increase due to long-running jobs and inefficient pipelines. Proper optimization through caching and parallelism is required, otherwise it can become expensive, which we faced in one of our telecom projects last year. One thing CircleCI can improve is related to cloud runners, where any network or platform issues can impact pipeline execution. This can be a concern for critical telecom deployments.
ZM
DevOps Team Leader at Elbit Systems Ltd
Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company
We are using the Incredibuild agent to run multiple processes on all available cores. This is the improvement that we did. Instead of the machine's core doing task after task, it is now running on multiple machines. In my working environment, it is saving time for all our developers in regards to the time consumption of the builds. My team has four people who manage and interact with Incredibuild as a product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."
"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by bringing in faster deployments, which means we can release faster, receive quicker feedback, and enhance collaboration and communication across the entire team."
"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."
"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."
"CircleCI is an amazing tool; it is fast, modern, and integrates with most systems, whether repositories or notification systems."
"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by helping integrate across different projects and aiding in the building of pipelines that help us do validation quickly."
"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization with faster time to market, improved software quality, cost efficiency, and increased developer productivity."
"CircleCI has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to improve our workflow and making parts of DevOps easier."
"It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"For each build that runs where I need to generate a code, it takes around half an hour instead of an hour and a half."
 

Cons

"CircleCI could be improved by enhancing the AI-generated pipeline, possibly with a self-optimizing CI/CD feature since it currently requires a lot of manual configuration."
"I chose an 8.5 for my rating because there are still many areas that need to be increased and improved, such as leveraging orbs and replacing custom, complex scripts with pre-built, community-verified orbs to reduce maintenance overhead."
"Regarding flexibility, Azure pipelines has the ability to pass variables with greater flexibility than CircleCI offers."
"Debugging is an important point for improvement because when pipelines fail, debugging can sometimes be difficult, especially for the complex workflows which we have already faced in our organization in different projects."
"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
"The solution’s pricing could be better."
"Sometimes the documentation is too in-depth."
"For half year we have used circleCI, then we go back to jenkins."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
"Its pricing and licensing are annoying. Every year, I need to renew. If I miss the deadline date, all my processes will stop working. So, I would prefer that I wouldn't need to renew every year, instead have another solution for it. Or, if we could have an enterprise license agreement with the company, then the development team wouldn't need to spend time renewing licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CircleCI?
Debugging is an important point for improvement because when pipelines fail, debugging can sometimes be difficult, especially for the complex workflows which we have already faced in our organizati...
What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?
I would advise organizations or individual developers who are trying to use CircleCI to begin with basic pipelines and gradually move to advanced workflows such as deployment automation, parallel j...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
Over 2,000 companies worldwide across industries inluding Epic Games, Microsoft, Playstation, Nintendo, Samsung, GM, Intel, CitiGroup, Qualcomm, Boeing, Motorola, Qt, and more accelerate their development and enhance their devs’ productivity with Incredibuild.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, GitHub and others in Build Automation. Updated: July 2026.
906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.