

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) and Trellix DLP compete in the security category, with Check Point emphasizing AI-driven threat prevention and Trellix focusing on data protection. Check Point appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced AI capabilities and robust threat protection features, while Trellix excels in endpoint security and comprehensive data management.
Features: Check Point WAF emphasizes threat prevention, using AI and machine learning to reduce false positives and defend against zero-day attacks. It integrates smoothly with centralized management systems, offering robust automation. Trellix DLP focuses on data protection, with real-time alerts and detailed policy management, enhancing endpoint security and data management capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Check Point WAF could simplify its user interface and setup process, while also improving its reporting and integration features. Trellix DLP should enhance Mac OS support, UI intuitiveness, and AI-driven data classification features to better align with user needs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point WAF stands out with its versatile deployment options across public and hybrid clouds and generally receives favorable comments on its customer service responsiveness, although support reliability could be improved. Trellix DLP is noted for its robust on-premises and hybrid cloud solutions, with competitive technical support, though some users find its management and support availability could be enhanced.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point WAF's pricing, while higher, is justified by its comprehensive security features, contributing favorably to ROI through time and cost savings. Trellix DLP is seen as more competitively priced, with straightforward licensing models benefiting businesses of various sizes, though its ROI manifests gradually through efficient data management.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
We estimate that we have saved around fifty thousand dollars annually by preventing potential breaches and reducing manual compliance work.
The benefits our customers see from using Trellix DLP include cost reduction, given its competitive pricing in India.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
We received prompt technical support and remote sessions when necessary.
Trellix's technical support deserves a perfect rating, and I would rate it ten out of ten compared to other solutions.
The support from both the vendor and Trellix is excellent.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
Trellix DLP is very scalable, especially with the cloud version as everything is managed in the cloud.
It's a bit of a fallback, and I know they are working on improving scalability.
I would rate the scalability of Trellix DLP between eight to nine out of ten.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
With the move to cloud provisioning, that is not a big problem anymore due to scalability on Trellix's side.
The agents are the main issue as they can behave inconsistently across different versions of operating systems.
Product stability is not a major concern; I would rate it 99% stable.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
Having someone within a region who understands the countries and how they approach data and information security is sometimes where the problem lies.
Improved compatibility with Mac OS is needed due to ineffective policy applications.
The product also faces challenges with high CPU and memory utilization, impacting endpoint performance.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
It used to be in the middle, tending towards the high end, especially in South Africa, where we need to convert from dollars to rands, making things very expensive quickly.
The solution is currently affordable and not considered expensive.
The pricing for Trellix DLP is good, and it always wins when compared to other solutions.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
Trellix products are manageable through a centralized control center, meeting requirements from frameworks like PCI DSS.
Additionally, it supports integration with third-party solutions and agents, providing a versatile and user-friendly management experience.
These features are very useful for protecting company confidential data from being copied to another remote location or other sites.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 0.7% |
| Trellix DLP | 2.6% |
| Other | 96.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.
Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.
What are the main features of Check Point WAF?Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.
Trellix DLP offers comprehensive data protection with advanced management features, ensuring compliance and data security across endpoints and networks. It integrates seamlessly into existing systems with centralized management for effective monitoring, data classification, and incident prevention.
Trellix DLP provides a robust data loss prevention platform that includes endpoint protection, web and network security, and customizable reporting through its centralized ePolicy Orchestrator. With machine learning capabilities, it enhances data classification and monitoring, ensuring protection across devices, cloud services, and applications. Trellix also supports compliance with security frameworks and integrates with third-party solutions, providing ease of installation via API services. Despite some areas needing improvement, such as support and Mac OS compatibility, Trellix remains a strong choice for organizations prioritizing data protection.
What Are Trellix DLP's Key Features?In industries like manufacturing, Trellix DLP is used for incident monitoring and protection against data leaks, particularly of sensitive personal and financial information. Organizations benefit from its capabilities to block unauthorized uploads and monitor document movements effectively, while also leveraging its third-party integrations and application monitoring features for comprehensive data security measures.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.