Check Point Security Management vs Digital Guardian comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
24 views|9 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Fortra Logo
560 views|346 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and Digital Guardian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Security Management vs. Digital Guardian Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The compliance is great.""Check Point Security Management has a great feature that allows you to automate the request of the automated server.""The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering.""The cluster solution made our job easier any fault to the device will not halt entire internet connectivity.""Each department can easily share data with the management without fear of data compromise.""Having the possibility to use Smart Event to check for threats on a broader scale helps after a security incident and also makes it easier to check - instead of looking through different logs.""I love the URL filtering as well as the identification capabilities which link with the Active Directory and work for me even with bandwidth regulation. These allow me to select to whom to do what, and when.""The SSL VPN monitoring based on users and tunnel monitoring are great value-added features present in the management console."

More Check Point Security Management Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Digital Guardian is its reputation. They have scored high on the Gartner Magic Quadrant.""It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability.""The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data.""We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations.""In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis.""It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis.""It has been scalable.""Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."

More Digital Guardian Pros →

Cons
"In order to work management console, you need some good appliance or you need to provide more CPU and Memory to the appliance.""It would be helpful if the documentation and good practice guides are updated. Many are still from R77.""It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform.""I would like the ability to have an overview, cross-site: One portal that does all firewalls. Also, the user interface is overly complicated.""I like that the Compliance software blade is available for free with the Security Management server purchase, but it is free for only one year - after that you have to buy an additional license to continue using it. I think such an important feature is vital for the management server, and should not be licensed separately.""Some of the configuration elements could be improved.""The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy.""We sometimes have trouble with the performance of the solution. Maybe some performance tuning options could be added in a future release. There should be more visibility about which blade in your firewall is causing the latency."

More Check Point Security Management Cons →

"It would be helpful if there was an on-premise version of the solution for companies that cannot use the cloud, such as government sectors.""Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial.""If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.""I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated.""The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel.""There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great.""Digital Guardian is an excellent solution but our experience with the partner has been the most horrible experience we have ever had with any partner.""The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."

More Digital Guardian Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
  • "This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
  • "Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
  • "The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
  • "Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
  • More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions."
  • "If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price."
  • "The price of Digital Guardian is expensive."
  • "The cost was around $300,000."
  • "The price of Digital Guardian is on the higher end compared to other vendors."
  • "I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten because Digital Guardian is expensive."
  • More Digital Guardian Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as… more »
    Top Answer:Check Point EDR has room for improvement, especially in the area of Data Loss Prevention where it currently lacks functionality. I'd also like to see enhancements in content filtering and… more »
    Top Answer:We utilize Check Point Security Management for our daily security operations, including managing firewall rules, reviewing alerts, and generating reports on a weekly basis.
    Top Answer:I like the solution's adaptive inspection and container inspection.
    Top Answer:Technical support is included in the subscription package. But if, during the subscription, our clients want to include the professional services of a Digital Guardian engineer, the price changes… more »
    Top Answer:If the client uses Windows 10 or 11 and Microsoft updates the operating system's version, Digital Guardian must update their product to match compatibility.
    Ranking
    Views
    24
    Comparisons
    9
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    479
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    560
    Comparisons
    346
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    604
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point Security Management is an advanced security management platform for enterprises. The platform integrates all aspects of security. A single platform manages the entire infrastructure, from data centers to private/public cloud deployments.

    Check Point Security Management is a reliable and easy-to-use security platform. It integrates all aspects of your security environment to strengthen the security posture without impairing productivity. The system has a layered policy model. This means the security policy can be separated into layers for network segmentation. Different administrators can manage different policies. The policy layer automates the tasks.

    The platform is extensible, scalable, and integrates easily with orchestration systems and change management.

    Basic Components of the Infrastructure

    1. Smart Console: The Check Point Graphical User Interface for connecting and managing Security Management Servers. The smart console provides an integrated solution via the following features:


    • Security policy management
    • System health monitoring
    • Multi-domain management


    The smart console offers several advantages. Changes in security policies and logs can be done with a click. You can navigate from an item within a log to the policy. There are also built-in multi-language support and accessibility features.

    1. Security Management Server: The server manages security gateways with set security policies and monitors security events on the network.

      The automation server is an integrated part of the management server. The API server is active by default on servers with 4 GB of RAM or more and on standalone servers with 8 or more GB of RAM.

      The automation server communicates with the management server the same way as the Smart Console. This architecture allows the same validation errors and warnings to be presented when using an automation session.

      The same audit logs generated using the Smart Console are also generated using an automation session. If you have a multi-domain environment, there is only one automation server that monitors all the IP addresses of the multi-domain management server.

      2. Security Gateway is placed at the edge of the network. It monitors and filters traffic and enforces security policies.

        Logging, Event management, and Monitoring

        With Check Point Security Management, logging, reporting, event management, and monitoring are integrated. The platform features widgets and chart templates that optimize visibility. One of the best features is the one-click exploration. This simplifies going from a general overview to specific event details.

        Benefits of Check Point Security Management

        • The platform keeps pace with dynamic network changes
        • Helps align security with business goals
        • Helps with threat prevention.
        • Reduces operational costs

        The unified console also means a single policy for users, data, applications, and networks. The granularity control helps accelerate administration processes. This feature, together with automation, is key to achieving reduced operational overhead. Security teams can automate tasks and even create self-service security web portals with the Check Point Security Management platform.

        Threat management is fully integrated, with reporting, logging, and monitoring all in one dashboard. This provides full visibility into the security of the network.

        Security Management Suite

        The Security Management Suite consists of the following modules:

        • Policy Management: Includes central management of different security policies across multiple domains and browser-based security management.
        • Operations Management: Includes compliance, provisioning, workflow automation, and user directory centralization.
        • Threat Management: Includes centralizing security event correlation for enforcement points. Centrally monitors Check Point devices.

        Reviews from Real Users

        A Network Security Engineer/Architect at a tech services company says, "The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."

        "The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering," says a System Engineer Network & Security at OTTO GmbH & Co KG.

        A Senior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited adds that "The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."





        Digital Guardian is proud to be part of Fortra’s comprehensive cybersecurity portfolio, and one of the Data Protection family of products. Fortra simplifies today’s complex cybersecurity landscape by bringing complementary products together to solve problems in innovative ways. These integrated, scalable solutions address the fast-changing challenges you face in safeguarding your organization. With the help of the powerful protection from Digital Guardian and others, Fortra is your relentless ally, here for you every step of the way throughout your cybersecurity journey.

        Sample Customers
        Hedgetec, Geiger
        The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
        Top Industries
        REVIEWERS
        Manufacturing Company19%
        Security Firm16%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Computer Software Company10%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Security Firm13%
        Computer Software Company13%
        Comms Service Provider9%
        Government8%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company18%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Manufacturing Company7%
        Insurance Company6%
        Company Size
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business34%
        Midsize Enterprise28%
        Large Enterprise38%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business37%
        Midsize Enterprise15%
        Large Enterprise48%
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business75%
        Large Enterprise25%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business25%
        Midsize Enterprise13%
        Large Enterprise62%
        Buyer's Guide
        Check Point Security Management vs. Digital Guardian
        March 2024
        Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Digital Guardian and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
        771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

        Check Point Security Management is ranked 13th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 55 reviews while Digital Guardian is ranked 19th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 11 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Digital Guardian is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "Great data classification and data discover with built-in endpoint detection and response". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Digital Guardian is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Digital Guardian report.

        See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

        We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.