Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Trend Micro is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Trend Micro’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 51 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

2,502 Views
626 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Read 9 Trend Micro Cloud App Security reviews

1,615 Views
646 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Trend Micro Cloud App Security and Check Point CloudGuard WAF provide strong solutions in the cloud security domain. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have the upper hand with a richer set of features despite being more expensive.

Features: Trend Micro Cloud App Security offers advanced malware protection, seamless integration with cloud services, and strong customer support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides comprehensive threat intelligence, customizable security policies, and greater flexibility across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance its reporting capabilities, real-time threat mitigation, and user interface. Check Point could improve configuration processes, provide more effective documentation, and simplify its setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Micro Cloud App Security stands out for its straightforward deployment and reliable support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a more complex setup but matches in customer service quality. Those seeking rapid deployment often select Trend Micro, while those interested in advanced features may lean towards Check Point despite the setup duration.

Pricing and ROI: Trend Micro Cloud App Security's competitive pricing leads to favorable ROI with a cost-effective installation. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, although more expensive, is perceived as a valuable investment due to its extensive capabilities. Trend Micro offers an initial cost benefit, yet Check Point's features suggest possible superior long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (9th)

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.5%
Trend Micro Cloud App Security	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2751468

Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Robust threat protection improves security and operational efficiency

Areas where Check Point CloudGuard WAF can improve include simple policy tuning, as the protection seems strong, though initial rule tuning can be complex. More guided workflows or templates would help speed up deployment, along with deeper integration with the DevOps pipeline, and while it handles API well, more dedicated API security would add value. In addition, it could be improved with better integration with the DevOps pipeline, more granular reporting, as the dashboards provide good high-level visibility, but sometimes digging into specific attack patterns or trends requires manual effort, and simple tuning of the ML models would be beneficial.

Read full review

Murali Krishnan L

Technical Manager (SOC Operations) at Novac Technology Solutions

User-friendly solution with good scalability

We use the solution to block phishing, spam, and impersonated emails The solution's feature for high-profile users' domains helps us detect impersonated emails. Also, its API-based features help in easy integration. The solution is easy to integrate and has the best feature for high-profile…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"It is a very scalable and stable solution."

"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."

"One of the best features of CloudGuard WAF is its user-friendly GUI dashboard."

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

"The best feature of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its advanced threat prevention, which is integrated with Check Point threat cloud intelligence providing real-time protection against web application attacks, including zero-day threats, automatically sourced from the threat cloud, Check Point threat intelligence database, analyzing millions of indicators of compromise daily."

"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors."

"Dependable with ease of integration with other security products."

"The solution is easy to integrate."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"I find Trend Micro Cloud App Security useful for scanning our email boxes. We can scan them one by one, which is a good feature. It's not just gateway-level protection - we integrate the email system with it. They have special protection and parameters for phishing emails."

"Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently."

"Trend Micro has DLP features in it, which separates it from other solutions."

"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security pros

Cons

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations."

"I have faced issues with the tool's blocking aspects. It is hard to open or block web services due to the multitude of cloud centers. I have to do the process manually at times. We have a bug which is hard to solve."

"I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more focused protection of the fields scheme validation."

"I have encountered issues with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's technical support. It also has missing configuration features."

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"They need improved latency in the main window."

"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."

"If the price could come down, I would be very happy with the product."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high."

"There is room for improvement in the DLP component of Trend Micro Cloud App Security."

"In the next release, I would like to see the cost go down."

"The price of the solution could improve by being lower."

"The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic."

"For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto."

"The solution's technical support services could be better."

"It would be great if Trend Mail Cloud App Security would be joined with a web security solution, making it a multiple-network solution."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."

"The pricing of the solution could be better."

"The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Security Firm

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The setup cost was taken with the head of the department, who handled the pricing and everything.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Currently, there is nothing in the areas of Check Point CloudGuard WAF that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. If there is anything in the roadmap, I would definitely like to t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto. The solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

We use the solution for cloud data protection, particularly for email and file-sharing systems. It integrates with Microsoft Office 365 and Google Suite to scan mailboxes for spam, viruses, and phi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

We chose the solution because they've been Gartner leaders for over 15 years, have a good customer base, and are a well-established company. I'd rate the product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 9% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

F-Secure Total vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 15% of the time

AVG Internet Security Business Edition vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

January 2026

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

January 2026

Download Trend Micro Cloud App Security product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Advanced threat and data protection for Microsoft Office 365, Google G Suite, and cloud file-sharing services

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

MedImpact Healthcare Systems, ClubCorp USA, Copa Airlines, Aava, Azra Solutions, BSN INET Co, Ltd, Carhartt

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.