Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Trend Micro is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Trend Micro’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 48 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

1,844 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Read 9 Trend Micro Cloud App Security reviews

1,461 Views
351 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Trend Micro Cloud App Security and Check Point CloudGuard WAF provide strong solutions in the cloud security domain. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have the upper hand with a richer set of features despite being more expensive.

Features: Trend Micro Cloud App Security offers advanced malware protection, seamless integration with cloud services, and strong customer support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides comprehensive threat intelligence, customizable security policies, and greater flexibility across diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance its reporting capabilities, real-time threat mitigation, and user interface. Check Point could improve configuration processes, provide more effective documentation, and simplify its setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trend Micro Cloud App Security stands out for its straightforward deployment and reliable support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a more complex setup but matches in customer service quality. Those seeking rapid deployment often select Trend Micro, while those interested in advanced features may lean towards Check Point despite the setup duration.

Pricing and ROI: Trend Micro Cloud App Security's competitive pricing leads to favorable ROI with a cost-effective installation. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, although more expensive, is perceived as a valuable investment due to its extensive capabilities. Trend Micro offers an initial cost benefit, yet Check Point's features suggest possible superior long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.3%
Trend Micro Cloud App Security	0.2%
Other	99.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Murali Krishnan L

Technical Manager (SOC Operations) at Novac Technology Solutions

User-friendly solution with good scalability

We use the solution to block phishing, spam, and impersonated emails The solution's feature for high-profile users' domains helps us detect impersonated emails. Also, its API-based features help in easy integration. The solution is easy to integrate and has the best feature for high-profile…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's ability to handle multiple websites and applications without needing more expensive hardware is a key advantage."

"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."

"Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure."

"The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection."

"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."

"The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"The automated policy creation and threat intelligence have helped my team by reducing manual configuration and saving time, and the threat intelligence updates ensure immediate protection against new threats, simplifying daily operations and improving response speed."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"Dependable with ease of integration with other security products."

"Our business emails are very important and Trend Micro Cloud App Security has provided a high level of protection. Additionally, there are updating the solution frequently."

"It has more intelligence features than other vendors."

"Trend Micro Cloud App is easy to use and easy to install."

"I find Trend Micro Cloud App Security useful for scanning our email boxes. We can scan them one by one, which is a good feature. It's not just gateway-level protection - we integrate the email system with it. They have special protection and parameters for phishing emails."

"The solution is easy to integrate."

"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms."

"Trend Micro has DLP features in it, which separates it from other solutions."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security pros

Cons

"For now, the product is doing all that I need, however, I need the support of IPv6."

"The reporting can be improved."

"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."

"I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more focused protection of the fields scheme validation."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF could be improved by simplifying the initial setup for a faster deployment, making the dashboard and reporting more customizable, and offering a more accessible pricing model."

"When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"The solution's technical support services could be better."

"For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto."

"The granulation of the policy setup needs to be better. Right now, it is too basic."

"Documentation could be improved; product cost is quite high."

"They should provide separate corporate-level licenses for two to three instances."

"In the next release, I would like to see the cost go down."

"The price of the solution could improve by being lower."

"It would be great if Trend Mail Cloud App Security would be joined with a web security solution, making it a multiple-network solution."

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution could be better."

"The price of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is expensive for regular users. There are not any hidden fees. First-time users of the solution should purchase implementation packages or professional services."

"The product's pricing is reasonable compared to other vendors."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The cost of the license is on the high side. It's a yearly subscription."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Cloud App Security is its stability across all platforms.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

For improvements, I think it would be great if Trend Micro Cloud App Security could enhance their product to be a single SASE solution. It should be similar to competitors like Palo Alto. The solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Trend Micro Cloud App Security?

We use the solution for cloud data protection, particularly for email and file-sharing systems. It integrates with Microsoft Office 365 and Google Suite to scan mailboxes for spam, viruses, and phi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

F-Secure Total vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 35% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 18% of the time

AVG Internet Security Business Edition vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 17% of the time

Trend Vision One - Cloud Security vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Trend Micro Cloud App Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2025

Download Trend Micro Cloud App Security product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Advanced threat and data protection for Microsoft Office 365, Google G Suite, and cloud file-sharing services

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

MedImpact Healthcare Systems, ClubCorp USA, Copa Airlines, Aava, Azra Solutions, BSN INET Co, Ltd, Carhartt

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Trend Micro Cloud App Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.