We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers robust data security, advanced incident detection, and the ability to customize rulesets. It also provides IAM role control, training capabilities, and detailed reporting. Trend Micro Cloud One focuses on vulnerability protection, login inspection, and event tracking. Users like Trend Micro's bug bounty program and lightweight scanning engine. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has room for improvement in reporting, false positive rate, integration, and customizability. Trend Micro Cloud One could benefit from enhancements in automation, logging, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Customers have had generally positive experiences with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management's customer service, reporting quick response times and decent services. However, a few customers have mentioned that the technical support could be improved. Trend Micro Cloud One's customer service is highly praised for its excellent and knowledgeable support team, which is available 24/7.
Ease of Deployment: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has a straightforward and quick initial setup process, while Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be more complex and may be difficult depending on the user's IT background.
Pricing: Some Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management users find it affordable, but others deem it costly and recommend considering cheaper alternatives. Trend Micro Cloud One is considered somewhat expensive, but users say the price is fair, given the value it offers.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is praised for its impressive ROI. It effectively addresses compliance issues and significantly reduces administrative workload. Trend Micro Cloud One offers seamless integration.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the preferred choice due to its comprehensive data security and protection. It offers a 360 view of customers' entire cloud infrastructure, with granular reporting, customizable rulesets, and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. Trend Micro Cloud One is criticized for its complicated initial setup and has room to improve in areas such as pricing, cloud support, and documentation.
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"The feature that I value the most about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is the possibility of checking compliance with different standards. This compliance check can be performed for each subscription or service that we have on all the different cloud providers that we use."
"Checkpoint posture management gives you visibility across your entire cloud infrastructure, so it helps you with management, maintenance, and compliance. With visibility across all these cloud platforms, you can protect against compromised credentials or identity theft."
"I love the work involved in maintaining and scaling security services and configurations across multiple public clouds using this solution, versus using native native cloud security controls. It is so much better. The different cloud platforms all have their own way that they handle a lot of the stuff that Dome9 handles. Even within their platform, they are in a lot of disparate places, e.g., in AWS, there are five different tools. You have to jump between them to get the same information that you can just pull in automatically on Dome9, which is just one platform. We are using multiple platforms, so that makes it even more complicated and time consuming if you had to just rely on them to get all of your information. Whereas, it's all just summarized and put together on the Dome9 end."
"The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"The stability is quite good."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"Automation and advanced threat prevention have room for improvement."
"The support it provides is not very good. They should improve it since we have had several setbacks due to support issues."
"They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."
"Check Point must provide a multi-cloud facility where AWS, Azure, and GCP can seamlessly work together and display posture in an integrated manner."
"The price of this solution should be reduced so that it is more affordable to scale."
"Reporting should have more options."
"Currently, this solution is somewhat expensive."
"I would like to see tighter integration with other compliance tools, like Chef Compliance, in addition to Inspector."
"The pricing can get high."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
More Trend Vision One- Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 56 reviews while Trend Vision One- Cloud Security is ranked 6th in CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) with 17 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One- Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One- Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Qualys VMDR and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One- Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and Orca Security. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Trend Vision One- Cloud Security report.
See our list of best CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) vendors, best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors, and best Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) vendors.
We monitor all CWPP (Cloud Workload Protection Platforms) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.