

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform compete in the cloud security and management space. CloudGuard focuses on security intelligence, while OpenShift offers stronger Kubernetes management. OpenShift is preferred for its comprehensive Kubernetes capabilities.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP highlights security intelligence, threat prevention, and IAM role control, aiding organizations in cloud governance and security visualization. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform stands out with comprehensive Kubernetes management, scalability, and developer-friendly tools, including automated deployment pipelines and integrated dev environments, making it ideal for enterprise applications.
Room for Improvement: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP should improve integration with third-party tools, reporting granularity, and on-premises support. Enhanced automation and integration capabilities are desired. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform could streamline its setup process and improve both documentation and cluster management complexity. Better integration and cost efficiencies could make it more accessible for smaller businesses.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is easy to integrate with public clouds, with generally responsive customer service, though technical support knowledge could be improved. Red Hat OpenShift's comprehensive infrastructure makes deployment complex, but it offers flexible options like on-premises and hybrid cloud. Professional technical support is provided but can be challenging due to setup and resource demands, though its enterprise presence ensures robust support.
Pricing and ROI: Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides a flexible asset-based licensing model, seen as cost-effective for large cloud uses but pricey for smaller enterprises, with ROI linked to security enhancements. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is priced at an enterprise level for its advanced capabilities, better suited for large organizations, with costs based on resource consumption, potentially limiting for smaller setups. Both platforms demonstrate ROI through efficiency gains, with CloudGuard emphasizing risk reduction and OpenShift focusing on development improvements.
The compliance has improved as our overall compliance score against CIS benchmark has improved from around 72 to 92% within the first three months of adoption.
This helped my team cut manual review time by roughly twenty to twenty-five percent, allowing me to reallocate effort to proactive cloud security improvements.
Monitoring cloud security automatically ensures a return on investment.
When I need help or have open questions, or if I require the capability to deploy a quick test environment, there are always people I can contact at Check Point to get my information or the environment as fast as I need it.
I have a dedicated support engineer and a presales engineer dedicated to me.
Customer support for Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP has been responsive and knowledgeable.
They should prioritize skilled engineers for urgent issues.
Visibility scales without performance issues as my environment expands.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP scales efficiently in the multi-cloud environment.
I never had any performance-related issues.
I rate the scalability of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine, as I haven't encountered any issues with scaling a cluster or applications.
Scalability is rated nine out of ten.
If there are errors, it is sometimes challenging to elaborate or troubleshoot since it is not transparent enough to understand what to search for.
It is rapidly evolving, and sometimes mistakes occur, necessitating testing.
There haven't been any issues so far; it remains stable with no downtime or crashes, and even the upgrades are handled seamlessly without issues.
I need more integration from the code-to-cloud principle.
It would be nice to have periodic updates on what people should do, maybe with some analysis or something.
I require consistency in the user interface to ensure everything is streamlined into the same look and feel.
The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage.
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is the best option, but as many companies and the world are mainly looking for security purposes, the clear text format needs to be adopted instead of any third party.
I would like to see advanced cluster management added in future releases, such as a single pane of glass to manage multiple clusters.
In terms of ROI, we can see time savings for audit preparation of at least 30-40%.
It is not cheap, of course, yet it is a necessity.
From a licensing and cost perspective, it is really competitive.
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month.
Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feedback, it is quite expensive.
One of the main reasons we use the solution is that it is great at identifying risks that are critical to our business.
The CDR helps detect anomalous behavior and respond to threats before they become an issue.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers a unified, modular platform that combines CSPM, CWPP, CIEM, code security, and cloud detection and response.
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform's policy-based governance has helped my organization maintain application security at scale because ACS is also there, and Red Hat is always maintaining things with hardening methods, always coming with hardened images, and we are frequently upgrading the minor and major versions, so it will be mitigated in that way.
It is important for critical systems.
The cluster scaling features, such as the auto-scaling of cluster nodes and application replicas using horizontal and vertical pod auto-scaling, significantly impact our operations.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP | 1.2% |
| Wiz | 6.4% |
| Tenable Nessus | 4.9% |
| Other | 87.5% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform | 17.5% |
| Amazon EKS | 13.0% |
| VMware Tanzu Platform | 8.3% |
| Other | 61.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 40 |
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers comprehensive cloud security with features like dynamic access control, asset protection, and compliance checks, tailored for organizations seeking enhanced governance across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms.
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP provides robust capabilities, including centralized firewall management, IAM scanning, and real-time visibility. Its strengths lie in predictive visualization, threat intelligence, and auto-remediation, making it a valuable tool for risk mitigation and compliance management. The platform's integration and responsiveness enhance cloud security, ensuring alignment with industry standards and effective threat protection.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP?Organizations in finance, healthcare, and retail frequently implement Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for compliance and security across cloud environments. It assists with workload protection, threat detection, and regulatory obligation fulfillment, proving effective for securing applications and monitoring API interactions.
Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.