No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs DeepSeek comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (2nd), AI Code Assistants (6th), AI Proofreading Tools (2nd)
DeepSeek
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
5th
Average Rating
3.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Large Language Models (LLMs) category, the mindshare of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is 7.1%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DeepSeek is 9.9%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise7.1%
DeepSeek9.9%
Other83.0%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a startup based organization
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
Malte Landwehr - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President, Seo at idealo Internet GmbH
Experience frequent delays and privacy concerns with current research tool
I advise not to use the web interface or the mobile app. If you think you should use it, use the self-hosted version. I gave DeepSeek a rating of 3 out of 10 because the core product, when it works, is actually good. But so often it's not working that I just can't give it a higher score.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One main thing is the amount of time we have saved since we started using ChatGPT Team - Enterprise in our project, as for every task we can get it done within minutes, whether it is a technical task, documentation, or sending out an email, saving almost four to five hours a day for us since we integrated ChatGPT Team - Enterprise into our project."
"Because of the integration of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, the number of errors which we are getting are reduced, error resolution has also improved a lot due to the correct point of contact pointing out from ChatGPT Team - Enterprise of the source of the error, due to which our project efficiency has improved."
"I have noticed clear time-saving benefits, particularly in documentation, code reviews, and internal knowledge sharing, and I estimate a 30 to 40 percent reduction in the time spent on repetitive technical tasks, which translates into faster time-to-market for features, improved marketing ROI through more experiments per quarter, and reduced agency spending via reusable content templates."
"Without ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, I wouldn't have been able to do a tenth of what I do currently."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise has positively impacted my organization by simplifying work, allowing tasks that could have required five or six people to be completed with fewer individuals while helping us create well-constructed content with great grammar and easily accessible stored information."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise makes my life very easy because every time I have to look up something on Google, I have to search through multiple results, but ChatGPT Team - Enterprise provides information in a simpler view with the easiest format and in quite literally the simplest sentences."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is very cheap, and the main advantage is that it is very affordable for a team."
"The initial setup was very simple."
"DeepSeek makes its reasoning traces public."
 

Cons

"If you ask it the same question twice, it gives you a slightly different answer, which even a human being does unless it memorizes something."
"They have room for improvements in search as sometimes it gives out wrong information."
"There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior."
"One area where ChatGPT Team - Enterprise can be improved is hallucinations."
"If we want to generate some complex queries which are using multiple databases or multiple tables, it may sometimes not return the final query correctly."
"The pricing is on the heavier side for the Nigerian market."
"In terms of improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, accuracy still requires enhancement in complex or high-domain specific scenarios, particularly architecture and security topics."
"I would not recommend ChatGPT as a standalone product. I think it could be beneficial when used alongside other tools, but as a standalone solution, its accuracy cannot be entirely trusted."
"The product is often extremely slow, and queries frequently fail due to system overload."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
10%
University
9%
University
16%
Educational Organization
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise needs to improve by reducing its complexity. The main issue is that the LLM they are using gives different suggestions and does not give a specific outcome, which is very ...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
My main use case for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is to make codes and write code in different languages so that every team member can understand it. Recently, while working on a project, I encountere...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
I advise using different plugins to get good lines of code. I gave this product a rating of 7 out of 10.
What needs improvement with DeepSeek?
I have data privacy concerns. The product is often extremely slow, and queries frequently fail due to system overload. DeepSeek needs to improve in stability, uptime, speed, and ensuring the tool i...
What is your primary use case for DeepSeek?
I use DeepSeek ( /products/deepseek-reviews ) for conducting research on complex questions and performing reasoning on complex questions. There have been countless instances where I needed to find ...
What advice do you have for others considering DeepSeek?
I advise not to use the web interface or the mobile app. If you think you should use it, use the self-hosted version. I gave DeepSeek a rating of 3 out of 10 because the core product, when it works...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Cohere and others in Large Language Models (LLMs). Updated: October 2026.
916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.