Centreon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7, while NETSCOUT is ranked #72. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
7,395 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Read 13 NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG reviews

3,014 Views
2,863 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Centreon

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG are competitors in the network monitoring domain. Centreon has a pricing advantage, while NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is praised for its sophisticated features.

Features: Centreon offers critical metrics monitoring, custom dashboards, and a single-pane view that integrates various solutions for complete visibility. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG provides packet-level analysis, utilization tracking, and easy scalability for a comprehensive understanding of network performance.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could enhance automation in poller updates, expand plugin diversity, and improve real-time remediation features. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG could lower implementation complexity, reduce the initial cost barrier, and enhance user interface ergonomics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon's deployment is straightforward with responsive customer service, facilitating quicker setup. In contrast, NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG involves a more intricate deployment process but compensates with thorough support and extensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon presents competitive pricing with strong return on investment due to its reasonable setup costs, beneficial for budget-conscious entities. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG demands a higher initial investment, but its robust feature set can lead to significant long-term returns for those prioritizing advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

72nd

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG	0.6%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Michael Gideon Genita

Associate System Engineer at SMS Global Technologies, Inc.

Easy to set up with good documentation and helpful support

I'm using it for a customer The packet flow switch is the most valuable aspect of the solution. It's an easy product to set up. We can scale the solution if we need to. It's stable. The documentation is well-written and quite useful. It's compatible with other products. Under the pocket flow…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon's user-friendly dashboard and minimal resource requirements lead to significant time and cost savings."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

"We picked Centreon because, after an open-source comparison, and given what we want to do, and our skills and experience as well, it was the best solution for us, the most reliable for our services."

"The customizable reports and dashboards are really flexible. We started this partnership with Centreon, when we were looking for a solution, because of the flexibility of the reporting. That's what we found to be most attractive in the solution. You can display the data as you want."

"Centreon enables us to proactively take action on issues before they even become incidents, which significantly reduces business disruptions resulting from controllable factors."

"The single-pane view provides us a view of all of our network infrastructure, and it is one of the most important tools that we use to see the status of our customers' networks."

"For servers and for applications, it was very, very efficient."

"It provides visibility into the network."

More Centreon pros

"The technical support is really good. They will go above and beyond, if you are running into a problem. You can go to a sales engineer, who will engage technical support to help you out."

"It's an easy product to set up."

"The solution has helped to increase application and network uptime, reduced our mean time to repair significantly for application and network issues, and cut our overall troubleshooting time from an hour down to five minutes."

"It has cut our troubleshooting down by days. Once we have a product in place, we show people examples of how it can streamline their troubleshooting process."

"An issue that used to take days is now fixed within minutes to an hour."

"It helps us to assist our customers to isolate problems. If it is us who is having the problem, then we can use it to streamline the process."

"Go with NETSCOUT."

"The real-time troubleshooting and application segregation that you can do within it."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG pros

Cons

"Improvements are needed in the area of cloud monitoring, as that's a newer feature."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"Currently, we have to go through all of the different templates and take a look at how the template is configured, and how specific parameters may change across different templates with different precedents, megatons, etc. It's a lot of work and involves trial and error. I wish they could simplify the process."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

More Centreon cons

"The scalability has some limitations and quirks to it. I would like to be able to upgrade rather than replace the whole thing."

"The stability depends on who is using the tool, because you only can get as much out of the tool as you put into it. There are a lot of patches for this particular environment, so you have to keep on them. If you lose track of them, then the product is not useful anymore."

"It's not able to communicate with our probes."

"The NetFlow Collectors could handle more flows per minute."

"There is a timeout feature that we have been asking for awhile."

"The monitoring and reporting tool needs improvement. Users want more information, such as the level of detail when doing a packet analysis. They want more detail to be able to isolate down to a specific point."

"The solution is not great, but it is not bad."

"Sometimes, we can't access it."

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The scalability is good, but it comes at a cost. E.g., if you need 100 InfiniStream because you are sending gigs or terabytes of data to one InfiniStream, then you will have to purchase another InfiniStream, which are not cheap."

"To capture more with the solution that we bought, you have to buy another InfiniStreamNG, and there are only four ports in the back."

"This product could be cheaper."

"The price is a little high."

"It can be scalable. It just costs too much. With a company as big as ours, it gets too expensive to accommodate every single site."

"I would like it to be more scalable with less spend."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Riverbed NPM+ vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 9% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 6% of the time

Flowmon vs NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Download NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG product report

Also Known As

No data available

InfiniStreamNG, NETSCOUT ISNG, Infinistream

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG delivers fast, cost-efficient network visibility with a single pane of glass view, featuring real-time traffic analysis, dependency mapping, and performance metrics for comprehensive management.

InfiniStreamNG stands out for its real-time insights into network activity, providing a unified platform for managing network components. Its deep packet inspection, scalability, and compatibility make it an essential tool for IT professionals looking to optimize network performance and resolve issues quickly. User-friendly interface enhancements are anticipated for improved usability, alongside early product lifecycle notifications due to extensive certification periods.

What are the key features of NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Speed: Enhances real-time traffic analysis and performance monitoring.
Network Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view with single pane device management.
Packet Inspection: Supports deep packet inspections for detailed data analytics.
Stability and Scalability: Ensures reliable performance and adapts to varying network sizes.
Compatibility: Seamlessly integrates with other technologies for smooth operations.

What are the benefits and ROI of using NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG?

Quick Issue Resolution: Identifies and addresses network issues swiftly.
Efficient Utilization: Offers insights for optimizing resource use and network management.
Proactive Monitoring: Facilitates early detection of potential issues to maintain performance.
Application Performance Tracking: Monitors app connectivity and performance effectively.
KPI Evaluation: Provides comprehensive data for informed decision-making.

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG is implemented across industries for packet collection and analysis, serving network monitoring and troubleshooting needs. Companies in telecommunications monitor LTE roaming traffic, while financial institutions rely on it for analyzing banking data. It supports application connectivity checks and proactive remote site monitoring, becoming integral in evaluating KPIs and reporting network issues.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

U.S. Department of Defense

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

September 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.