Centreon vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor comparison

Centreon and IDERA are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while IDERA is ranked #86. Centreon holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to IDERA’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
6,545 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews

2,004 Views
1,503 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor are competitors in IT infrastructure monitoring. Centreon seems to have the upper hand due to its flexible pricing and robust support, although IDERA offers compelling value because of its feature set and reliability.

Features: Centreon offers extensive customization capabilities, advanced reporting, and robust alerting functionalities. It integrates seamlessly with third-party tools, providing enhanced monitoring functionalities. IDERA provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring with in-depth insights into network performance using historical data analytics. It highlights detailed network visibility and analytics strength.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is known for straightforward deployment, supported by effective systems that aid in smooth integration and operation. IDERA provides a streamlined installation process with efficient customer service and proactive engagement, which may enhance ease of use.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is recognized for flexible pricing, leading to favorable ROI over time, appealing to budget-conscious users. IDERA may have a higher initial cost; however, it promises robust long-term returns due to its superior features. Both offer significant ROI, with Centreon appealing for cost-effectiveness and IDERA providing greater economic value through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

86th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

72nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.3%
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Nafiu Garba

Special Assistant to the Governor ICT COO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices

What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The single-pane view provides us a view of all of our network infrastructure, and it is one of the most important tools that we use to see the status of our customers' networks."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

"The product is available in ISO image format, ready for deployment. Centreon also has a comprehensive guide and documentation that are simple and easy to follow."

"This product provides comprehensive reporting for our top management."

"We have all our tickets inside Centreon in real-time and can monitor a lot of ELP and CLN in real-time for application purposes."

"During the day it probably saves us 50 percent of our time, and during the night it's even more."

"I find the product's scalability to be one of the most valuable features since it allows us to add unlimited devices for monitoring and to set up additional polling servers without additional license cost or downtime in our monitoring."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

More Centreon pros

"Easy to setup and begin monitoring."

"Customer Service: 5 stars! Excellent. Technical Support: 5 stars! Excellent."

"Now with the features given through up.time we have over 300 + monitors constantly checking every environment that we have and also checking databases for errors."

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."

Cons

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

"Sometimes, when the GUI and some of the search fields are being reset, and I return to the page, then I have to set them again. Therefore, some improvement on the UI and the filtering is needed."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Improvements are needed in the area of cloud monitoring, as that's a newer feature."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"Centreon is very bad with auto-scanning. It's very monolithic software. It doesn't have microservices and it only has basic clustering. You cannot, for example, have six or seven nodes for Centreon's cloud processes."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

More Centreon cons

"Maintenance windows need to be streamlined."

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."

"While you can restrict particular users to only see subsets of the reports, it isn't as easy as it could be."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

23%

Comms Service Provider

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 12% of the time

Zabbix vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Nagios XI vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

NetFortris LiveWatch vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report

Download IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor efficiently monitors and manages IT infrastructure, offering real-time analytics and alerts to optimize performance and prevent downtime.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring for servers, apps, and networks, ensuring seamless operations. It delivers detailed insights through customizable dashboards, offering full visibility into enterprise IT health. Users benefit from automated alerting, performance metrics, and capacity planning tools that enhance reliability and reduce risks of outages.

What are the key features of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor?

Real-time monitoring: Continuously tracks system performance to detect issues immediately.
Custom dashboards: Users can configure dashboards to display critical metrics relevant to their infrastructure.
Automated alerts: Delivers instant notifications on performance problems, allowing for swift action.
Capacity planning: Analyzes trends to predict future utilization needs and support decision-making.
Comprehensive reporting: Generates detailed reports for performance analysis and capacity planning.

What benefits and ROI can reviews highlight?

Increased uptime: Continuous monitoring reduces the likelihood of system failures, enhancing operational continuity.
Improved resource management: Efficient capacity planning leads to optimized resource allocation.
Cost savings: Proactive alerts minimize the costs associated with downtime and emergency fixes.
Enhanced decision-making: Accurate data analysis enables informed strategic planning.

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail where maintaining high availability is critical. It supports IT teams in proactively managing infrastructure, ensuring systems are responsive, secure, and capable of meeting growth demands.

IDERA

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.