Centerity Monitor vs Infraon IMS comparison

Centerity Systems and EverestIMS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centerity Systems is ranked #73, while EverestIMS is ranked #57. Centerity Systems holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Centerity Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.

Centerity Monitor

Read 2 Centerity Monitor reviews

499 Views
494 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

1,379 Views
855 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centerity Monitor

Infraon IMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Centerity Monitor and Infraon IMS compete in the IT infrastructure management sector. While Centerity Monitor is deemed more favorable in pricing and customer support, Infraon IMS is considered superior due to its comprehensive features and value for investment.

Features: Centerity Monitor provides real-time alerting, predictive analytics, and robust infrastructure visibility. Infraon IMS offers extensive integration capabilities, automation features, and a broader range of functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Centerity Monitor can enhance its integration options, expand feature sets, and improve analytics detail. Infraon IMS could streamline its deployment process, reduce complexity, and refine user interface elements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centerity Monitor provides straightforward deployment and attentive customer support for a smoother setup. Infraon IMS offers a more complex deployment but includes comprehensive support resources and detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Centerity Monitor is recognized for competitive pricing, offering cost-effective solutions with good ROI for small to mid-sized operations. Infraon IMS, despite a higher upfront cost, delivers enhanced features promising greater long-term ROI, making it suitable for larger enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centerity Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

73rd

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Infraon IMS

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

57th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (88th), Server Monitoring (33rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (51st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centerity Monitor is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Infraon IMS	0.6%
Centerity Monitor	0.4%
Other	99.0%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer1312155

Andean Region Manager at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature

We use Centerity to monitor some business views related with ERP systems. For example we use this monitor to mesure electronic billing process. As a part of digital Transformation process coporation automates some process to avoid delays and human mistakes and we incorporated Centerity Platform to…

Read full review

it_user1631601

GTM Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Our process efficiency has improved by having all the information in one place, which has reduced manpower

The product is great. We integrated the ticketing tool with the monitoring tool. The agent ID creation is very easy when using this tool. It is so user-friendly. The user interface is good and also the pricing is great. The user interface is good, even a business user or layman can raise a ticket. They provide an all-in-one monitoring tool. If an issue happens, it gets integrated with the email, then proactively that ticket is being raised, which is good. The reporting is good. It is very clear. It is a customized report; however you want it, you can customize it. We use the solution’s role-based dashboards. The head of IT wants to use it so he can see holistically what is happening, e.g., what are the tickets being raised, what is a major issue, and what escalations are happening. There are different dashboards that are customized. For our head of IT, we made a separate dashboard. Then, for the executives, we made a separate dashboard based on time, like hourly or daily. All these reports were customized. While they didn't provide a BI dashboard, they provide a kind of graphical dashboard for whatever the issue is. Once you click on a particular ticket, it drills down to the issue, what it is and when the issue was raised. The drill down is good. It is more like a business intelligence (BI) tool. You can just scroll and zoom in. It goes deep into the issue. Once you click a particular dashboard, it will take you to the next page, then it takes you to the issue. Infraon IMS provides workflow automation for real-world use cases. This makes our work easier. It is just drag and drop (no coding) to build the workflows. For example, a particular ticket is being raised. It gets routed to three important IT executives within our team. From our team, it gets routed to the next level. The learning curve is good. Initially, there were no issues. As soon as the users saw the product, they understood what the product was. There wasn't any kind of training required for this product because it is very straightforward.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Centerity gives us exactly what we need from performance system monitoring."

"The machine learning feature is valuable."

"Centerity is much more than a monitoring tool — it’s a unified, end-to-end, enterprise-class and multi-tenanted AIOps Platform that is purpose-built to help MSPs and data-centers deliver the highest levels of up-time and performance."

"With Infraon, everything is already built-in so you are able to plug-and-play with the system."

"Once we installed this central system, our site engineers who provide the data started believing in the data's accuracy."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"Being an engineering product, the customization is easy for us compared to SolarWinds and ManageEngine."

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

More Infraon IMS pros

Cons

"The GUI must be improved. Graphs must be changed including high level maps"

"One of the major improvements should be it implementation as a SaaS"

"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"In terms of improvements, I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

More Infraon IMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centerity Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centerity Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centerity Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs Centerity Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

More Centerity Monitor Competitors

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 8% of the time

Nagios XI vs Infraon IMS

Compared 6% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 6% of the time

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Infraon IMS

Compared 5% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Centerity Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

March 2026

Download Infraon IMS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Everest IMS

Overview

Centerity is the pioneer provider of an All-in-One, IT Monitoring and Business Service Management (BSM) platform. Whereas legacy tools have focused on monitoring individual technologies which led to silos of performance data, Centerity breaks down silos by extending its monitoring coverage across all technology layers, from infrastructure (physical, virtual, converged, AWS, etc.) to applications (OS, SAP, Cloudera, etc.) and databases (SAP HANA, Hadoop, NoSQL, etc.), thereby providing an integrated, holistic view of system health, performance and availability. Centerity’s unique, unified platform, named a Gartner Cool Vendor in ITOM, can serve the needs of both IT executives and administrators while providing a complete business intelligence layer across all IT assets via cross technical and functional domain impact and trend analysis through its Business Service Management (BSM) capabilities.

Centerity Systems

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?

Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.

What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?

Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS

Sample Customers

Centerity Systems has thousands of customers world wide, including Fortune 500 Enterprises such as Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, Harris Corporation, and Coca-Cola.

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Buyer's Guide

Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS

March 2026

Free Report: Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS

Find out what your peers are saying about Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.