Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Centerity Monitor vs Infraon IMS comparison

Centerity Systems and EverestIMS are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Centerity Systems is ranked #69, while EverestIMS is ranked #57. Centerity Systems holds a 0.1% mindshare in IM, compared to EverestIMS’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Centerity Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of EverestIMS users who would recommend it.
Centerity Monitor
Read 2 Centerity Monitor reviews
  • 250 Views
  • 245 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Infraon IMS
Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews
  • 628 Views
  • 446 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Centerity Monitor and Infraon IMS compete in the IT infrastructure management sector. While Centerity Monitor is deemed more favorable in pricing and customer support, Infraon IMS is considered superior due to its comprehensive features and value for investment.

Features: Centerity Monitor provides real-time alerting, predictive analytics, and robust infrastructure visibility. Infraon IMS offers extensive integration capabilities, automation features, and a broader range of functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Centerity Monitor can enhance its integration options, expand feature sets, and improve analytics detail. Infraon IMS could streamline its deployment process, reduce complexity, and refine user interface elements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centerity Monitor provides straightforward deployment and attentive customer support for a smoother setup. Infraon IMS offers a more complex deployment but includes comprehensive support resources and detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Centerity Monitor is recognized for competitive pricing, offering cost-effective solutions with good ROI for small to mid-sized operations. Infraon IMS, despite a higher upfront cost, delivers enhanced features promising greater long-term ROI, making it suitable for larger enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Centerity Monitor
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
69th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Infraon IMS
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
57th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (86th), Server Monitoring (31st), Cloud Monitoring Software (46th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centerity Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1312155 - PeerSpot reviewer
A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature
We use Centerity to monitor some business views related with ERP systems. For example we use this monitor to mesure electronic billing process. As a part of digital Transformation process coporation automates some process to avoid delays and human mistakes and we incorporated Centerity Platform to…
Read full review
Maharajan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization
The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The machine learning feature is valuable."
"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."
"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."
"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."
"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."
"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."
"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."
"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."
"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."
 

Cons

"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."
"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."
"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."
"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."
"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."
"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."
"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."
"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."
"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."
"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."
"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."
"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."
"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
16%
Construction Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS Logo
Zabbix vs Infraon IMS
Compared 33% of the time
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS Logo
Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS
Compared 30% of the time
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS
Compared 19% of the time
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS Logo
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs Infraon IMS
Compared 17% of the time
More Infraon IMS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
July 2025
Centerity Monitor reportDownload Centerity Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Infraon IMS
August 2025
Infraon IMS reportDownload Infraon IMS product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Everest IMS
 

Overview

Centerity is the pioneer provider of an All-in-One, IT Monitoring and Business Service Management (BSM) platform. Whereas legacy tools have focused on monitoring individual technologies which led to silos of performance data, Centerity breaks down silos by extending its monitoring coverage across all technology layers, from infrastructure (physical, virtual, converged, AWS, etc.) to applications (OS, SAP, Cloudera, etc.) and databases (SAP HANA, Hadoop, NoSQL, etc.), thereby providing an integrated, holistic view of system health, performance and availability. Centerity’s unique, unified platform, named a Gartner Cool Vendor in ITOM, can serve the needs of both IT executives and administrators while providing a complete business intelligence layer across all IT assets via cross technical and functional domain impact and trend analysis through its Business Service Management (BSM) capabilities.
Centerity Systems

Infraon IMS offers network monitoring with real-time dashboards, customizable GUIs, and integrated tools, supporting device management and workflow automation efficiently.

Infraon IMS delivers stable performance with features tailored for easy customization and detailed network management. Users benefit from real-time monitoring through role-based dashboards and integrated ticketing tools. However, improvements in reporting, GUI usability, and AI integration are needed. Challenges include monitoring non-IPBS devices and improving connectivity visibility. Users require seamless Infraon Desk integration, ease of device addition, and enhanced topology views.

What are the key features of Infraon IMS?
  • Stable Performance: Provides consistent network oversight.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Role-based, interactive GUIs for tailored views.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Comprehensive network visibility and alerts.
  • Workflow Automation: Streamlines operational processes.
  • Configuration Backup: Ensures data integrity and easy recovery.
  • Granular Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and analysis.
  • Intuitive Interface: Enhances user interaction and experience.
  • Quick Device Discovery: Facilitates effective network management.
  • Email Alerts: Keeps users informed on device status.
  • CSV Upload: Manages high-volume device data efficiently.
What benefits do users find in Infraon IMS?
  • Centralized Access: Simplifies firewall and device management.
  • Enhanced IT Management: Improved monitoring of uptime, downtime, and utilization.
  • Flexible Deployment: Support for global locations with cloud and on-premises options.
  • Link Monitoring Automation: Boosts operational efficiency.

In industries like IT infrastructure and data center management, Infraon IMS is utilized for network monitoring and managing key components such as leased lines and firewalls. Its capabilities aid diverse geographical locations in overseeing data centers, offering centralized monitoring and access to critical infrastructure.

EverestIMS
 

Sample Customers

Centerity Systems has thousands of customers world wide, including Fortune 500 Enterprises such as Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, Harris Corporation, and Coca-Cola.
Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc. 
Buyer's Guide
Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS
July 2025
Free Report: Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Centerity Monitor vs. Infraon IMS report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.