Catalogic DPX vs NetApp SnapCenter comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Catalogic and NetApp are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Catalogic is ranked #78, while NetApp is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.0. Catalogic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to NetApp’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,790 Views
1,701 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapCenter

Read 28 NetApp SnapCenter reviews

3,939 Views
3,821 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

NetApp SnapCenter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and NetApp SnapCenter are two prominent data protection solutions. Users seem more satisfied with the affordability and support of Catalogic DPX, while NetApp SnapCenter is often preferred for its comprehensive set of features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Catalogic DPX offers reliable backup, efficient storage solutions, and data recovery capabilities. NetApp SnapCenter provides integration with other NetApp products, application-consistent backups, and ease of data management. NetApp SnapCenter offers superior integration and comprehensive data management, while Catalogic DPX focuses on storage efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX needs enhancements in scalability and advanced reporting options. NetApp SnapCenter requires better integration with non-NetApp storage and improved scheduling features. Catalogic DPX could benefit from advanced functionalities, while NetApp SnapCenter needs broader storage compatibility and refined scheduling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive support team. NetApp SnapCenter also has a relatively easy deployment process but gets mixed reviews on customer service. While both are simple to deploy, Catalogic DPX has an edge in customer support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX is highlighted for its lower setup costs and satisfactory return on investment. NetApp SnapCenter users accept the higher initial cost due to the extensive feature set offering long-term value. Catalogic DPX stands out for cost efficiency and ROI, whereas NetApp SnapCenter's higher price is balanced by its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

78th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp SnapCenter

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

35th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapCenter is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp SnapCenter	0.8%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	98.7%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

SaneeshC

Sr. engineer at Sify Technologies

Has reduced backup time for large workloads and supports smooth workload migration

Role-based access control and multi-factor authentication are security features available in NetApp SnapCenter. The one-time password comes to our multi-factor authentication tool; we work with Cisco Duo, and that OTP is generated through that tool, which we use to access the device. There are different options through which we can migrate workloads without downtime. The user interface is very easy to handle and not complicated. There are multiple features that make NetApp SnapCenter valuable. In case of any job failure, we get an alert over email. For jobs replicating from site A to site B, we know how long it will take to complete that replication. All that information is available in the console, and there aren't any difficulties or objections that need to be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"You can quickly deploy new virtual environments. It provides efficient and easy-to-use data protection. If a file goes missing or corruption occurs, you can restore it swiftly using the snap restore feature, allowing you to return to work almost immediately."

"The most valuable feature is the RBAC, the Role-Based Access Control. In our managed service, we can have different layers of security."

"From the feedback I've heard from clients, they do experience time savings with this solution."

"The most valuable feature is that it's centralized. In the old SnapManager days, we had software for each server. Now, with a centralized system, we're able to manage all systems remotely, and all agents remotely, and update them remotely. That's a huge benefit for us."

"The Exchange plugin is the most valuable because we have a lot of customers that use SnapManager Exchange and have to migrate to SnapCenter."

"The backup process finishes very quickly."

"The reporting feature has been particularly beneficial to upper management... When you do manual backups, you do not get the benefit of seeing successes and failures and how often you have to do restores. With SnapCenter, you get all of that."

"We have found that the snapshotting mechanism is better than VMware."

More NetApp SnapCenter pros

Cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"I'm waiting for SnapCenter for hybrid solutions. Right now, we only have SnapManager for hybrid."

"The compatibility with other manufacturers, like Oracle and Hyper-V, could be improved. I would like to see it be more compatible with other software."

"The documentation could be a little bit better so that we could handle more of the troubleshooting ourselves, rather than having to go through support."

"We have experienced some difficulties with our current support. We are engaging in engineering level support because some of our problems are more technical."

"For us, it's a pain and a waste of time because NetApp wants us to be highly certified."

"Since the solution's initial setup is complex, it should make training documents available in the public space."

"There is one area that needs improvement and that's in the alerting. When you set up your SMTP alerts, it only has - and I don't understand why - the ability to send an anonymous SMTP. It doesn't do basic authentication, which frustrated me for a while until I figured out that I'm not missing something. It's just not there."

"NetApp technical support is struggling. I feel there is definitely room for improvement in tech support."

More NetApp SnapCenter cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive."

"It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products."

"We have a site license, so it comes with the product."

"The licensing is well-designed because it's already included in some packages with NetApp storage. Therefore, for most customers, it's okay as the SnapCenter license is already included in some NetApp bundles."

"The product is inexpensive."

"It comes free with the amount of equipment we purchase from NetApp. In terms of pricing, zero is my favorite number."

"Pricing is very good because if you already have NepApp controllers, then it's included."

"The license for SnapCenter was included with the storage array."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapCenter?

The product team handles the commercial aspects of pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapCenter?

We have not started much with the automation capability in NetApp SnapCenter. Regarding the integration aspect, I am not certain about its complexity, as this was built by the OEM NetApp team.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp SnapCenter?

The major use case for NetApp SnapCenter is that our customer previously used Commvault. For huge VMs with sizes of five TB or 10 TB, taking the file level backup in Commvault took a long time, oft...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 8% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 8% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 5% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 9% of the time

NetApp Cloud Backup vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 6% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs NetApp SnapCenter

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp SnapCenter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapCenter

September 2026

Download NetApp SnapCenter product report

Also Known As

BEX

SnapCenter

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

NetApp SnapCenter offers centralized management for backup and recovery, enhancing data protection and operation efficiency by integrating with storage systems and simplifying application management.

NetApp SnapCenter improves data protection with its centralized management, supporting essential enterprise functions with backup, restore processes, and fast recovery. Its ease of deployment, simplistic operational management, instant cloning, and role-based control contribute to its value. Integration with VMware streamlines virtualization tasks and promotes rapid restoration. While serving diverse environments like VMware, SQL, Oracle, and HANA databases, SnapCenter integrates well with existing systems but can enhance cloud integration and replication capabilities. Many enterprises leverage SnapCenter's centralized capabilities to maximize data management efficiency, managing extensive data seamlessly.

What are the key features of NetApp SnapCenter?

Centralized Management: Simplifies backup and management across environments.
Integrated Storage and Backup: Allows seamless data handling and recovery.
Instant Cloning: Promotes rapid data replication and testing.
Role-Based Access Control: Enhances security with customized user access.
VMware Integration: Streamlines virtualization tasks while ensuring quick restoration.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficient Data Recovery: Faster restoration minimizes downtime.
Simplified Deployment: Quick implementation with comprehensive reporting.
Enhanced Performance: Application-aware backups improve system efficiency.
Reduced Operational Costs: Effective data management maximizes ROI.

Enterprises in sectors such as technology, finance, and healthcare implement NetApp SnapCenter for reliable data recovery and protection. The tool supports databases like Oracle for efficient application-aware operations, enhancing business continuity and reducing data-related risks.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

All for One Steeb AG, Accenture

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.