Catalogic DPX vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup comparison

Catalogic and IDERA are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Catalogic is ranked #72, while IDERA is ranked #71. Catalogic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to IDERA’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution.

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,221 Views
1,160 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Read 3 IDERA SQL Safe Backup reviews

1,512 Views
1,240 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and IDERA SQL Safe Backup are popular data protection solutions. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is considered superior due to its extensive feature set, making it worth the investment.

Features: Catalogic DPX is known for its reliable and comprehensive backup functions, quick data restoration, and efficient storage management. IDERA SQL Safe Backup offers advanced compression and encryption, robust automation capabilities, and greater flexibility and control for users.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX users suggest enhancing scheduling capabilities, developing a more intuitive alert system, and addressing initial setup challenges. IDERA SQL Safe Backup users point out the need for a more seamless recovery process, better scalability, and additional technical support during deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX deployment is straightforward, though some users face initial setup and configuration challenges. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is relatively easy to deploy but may require additional technical support. Both companies offer responsive customer service, with Catalogic noted for its helpfulness and expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX is cost-effective, offering good value and respectable ROI. IDERA SQL Safe Backup may be higher priced, but users feel the investment is justified given its advanced features and comprehensive support. Catalogic DPX is more budget-friendly, while IDERA SQL Safe Backup's higher cost is balanced by its robust capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

72nd

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

71st

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA SQL Safe Backup is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IDERA SQL Safe Backup	0.6%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

SeniorDB3550

Senior DBA Lead at a government with 10,001+ employees

It has reduced our backup time, however backups do get skipped

I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client. They moved a lot of the features to their web-based version of it. Because of the large number of databases that we have along with our backup, their web product can't handle it. So, we can't use it. So, we are missing out on a lot of the new features. The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection. Unless you can remember day-to-day that you may have something deselected or selected, your view may be different than you expect, and there is no visual indication of it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

"It is far better than the native SQL compressed backup utility, and even though we are seeing approximately 1.4 : 1 de-duplication ratio (using compression at Level 3) we've saved so much space that we still have more than 33% free space on our backup appliances."

"I do like the central management console where you can see a global status for all your backups and manage restores."

"It has reduced our backup time and simplified our backup processes across all the servers."

"The compression, because it drastically reduces the disk space."

Cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

"Lots of room for improvement. I have never experienced anything as buggy as SQLsafe."

"I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client."

"For a supposedly mature product, it lacks basic functionality that the built-in Microsoft SQL Server backup/restore programs provide and being told we'll be added to interested party list isn't very satisfying."

"The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection."

"Make sure you check your backups on a regular basis. Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

"Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 20% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 8% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 11% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 9% of the time

SCOM vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 6% of the time

More IDERA SQL Safe Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

May 2026

Download IDERA SQL Safe Backup product report

Also Known As

BEX

SQL Safe Backup

Overview

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

IDERA SQL Safe Backup offers reliable and comprehensive solutions for database backup, compression, and recovery, ensuring optimal performance and data security for enterprises.

Featuring a robust architecture, IDERA SQL Safe Backup is designed for automated backup management and rapid database restoration. It provides advanced features that simplify backup strategies and improve database performance through efficient storage solutions. Suitable for businesses of all sizes, its capabilities help IT teams maintain data integrity and continuity.

What are the key features of IDERA SQL Safe Backup?

Automated Backups: Streamline backup processes with scheduled jobs reducing manual tasks.
Compression Technology: Enhance storage efficiency with high compression rates lowering disk space usage.
Instant Restore: Immediately access backup data minimizing downtime during recovery processes.
Centralized Management: Manage all aspects of backup environments from a single interface for ease of use.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating IDERA SQL Safe Backup?

Cost Efficiency: Lower operational costs with reduced storage requirements and automated processes.
Time Savings: Save time with simplified management and swift restoration practices.
Data Security: Ensure data safety with secure backup and encryption standards robust enough to meet enterprise needs.
Scalability: Adapt easily to changing needs as databases grow over time without performance loss.

Industries like finance and healthcare benefit significantly from IDERA SQL Safe Backup due to its fast recovery time and robust encryption standards. These features are critical for sectors that handle sensitive data and require compliance with strict regulations. The solution's scalability ensures it can grow with industries experiencing rapid data expansion.

IDERA

Sample Customers

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Woman's Hospital; Sisters of Mercy Hospital System; University Medical Center; MetTel; PPG Industries; 3M; Abbott Laboratories; Comcast; Daimler; GameStop; Hormel Foods; Marriott International; Merck; NCR; United Technologies; City of Lynnwood; Linfosys B.V.; TRI-KES; American Customer Care; Merck & Co., Inc.; Service Corporation International; Fresenius Vascular Care Inc.; Bates White; TechPro Inc.; TW Metals, Inc.; Tulane University; ISO Group; Ameriben Solutions; Instron Corporation; Sentric, Inc.; SPIE; GAS Distribution Company of Thessaloniki and Thessaly SA; American Printing House for the Blind; Paysafe; Freeman Decorating Services, Inc.; Sentric, Inc.; Auburn University; Corporate Communications Group; Sagicor Financial Corporation; Crystal Run Healthcare; Principality Building Society; Experiencias Xcaret; Missoula County; Shellpoint Partners LLC; Solix Inc.; Advicent Solutions, Inc.; Phoenix Newspaper Inc.; Park Place Technologies; Kelly & Associates Insurance Group; Boston Medical Center; Service Corporation International; eResearchTechnology, Inc.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.