

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
I have seen a return on investment, and the ROI was visible within a few months through cloud cost reduction alone.
The ROI was visible within a few months through cloud cost reduction alone.
CAST AI has reduced approximately 40% of our AWS bills and AWS cloud bills.
The AI features that they have and with which we can rewrite the pipeline and troubleshoot issues significantly saved time.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
I would rate the customer support 10 out of 10.
The governance and security of CAST AI are solid, providing sufficient visibility into cluster changes and optimization actions.
Response times are reasonable and the team is knowledgeable.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
There was an instance when I faced issues with third-party plugins, and after raising a support ticket, they responded in a few hours with a documentation link that resolved my issue.
It is a SaaS platform that will scale automatically.
CAST AI's scalability is very good; it scales effectively with cluster growth and increasing workload complexity.
It scales effectively with cluster growth and increasing workload complexity.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
In most cases, the optimization suggestions are practical and effective.
CAST AI has proven to be stable and reliable in production environments.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
There are many pros here, including easy onboarding, simple deployment, and excellent Kubernetes visibility, strong spot instance automation, and automated right-sizing.
More detailed documentation and deeper visibility into certain optimization decisions would also be helpful.
To improve CAST AI, I would like to see more granular reporting, deeper cost allocation insights, and additional customization options for optimization policies.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
In terms of pricing, I believe the pricing is reasonable because of the amount of savings and operational efficiency it delivers, making it easier to justify the investment.
I have not found the price to be too high for the features it provides.
Pricing was reasonable considering the cost savings achieved
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The licensing cost is a little bit too high.
CAST AI has had a positive impact on my organization through cost reduction. On average, I think the savings are between 15 and 20 percent, and for certain workloads, these savings can be even higher.
CAST AI has positively impacted our organization by reducing cloud costs, improving resource utilization, and allowing our engineering team to spend less time managing infrastructure and more time on platform improvements.
With CAST AI, nodes are added or removed automatically as workloads change, helping us maintain application performance while reducing unnecessary cloud costs.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
If something goes wrong, I can use AI troubleshooting to build or test my fails and analyze the logs, suggesting the fixes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Harness | 2.1% |
| CAST AI | 1.9% |
| Other | 96.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
CAST AI is revered for its powerful cloud optimization capabilities, notably in cost reduction, performance enhancement, and security strengthening. It automates resource management and scales operations efficiently, leading to significant organizational improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and smoother cloud integration and management.
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.