Carbonite Server vs N-able Cove Data Protection comparison

OpenText and N-able are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. OpenText is ranked #46, while N-able is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in CB, compared to N-able’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

2,242 Views
1,323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able Cove Data Protection

Read 23 N-able Cove Data Protection reviews

4,523 Views
2,533 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

N-able Cove Data Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

N-able Cove Data Protection and Carbonite Server are two leading solutions in the data protection market. N-able Cove Data Protection generally performs better in terms of deployment and customer service, while Carbonite Server appears stronger in certain features and pricing aspects.

Features: N-able Cove Data Protection is highly praised for its comprehensive backup capabilities, seamless integrations, and user-friendly interface. Carbonite Server, on the other hand, is appreciated for its robust remote disaster recovery options, extensive security features, and reliable data encryption. Users find both products valuable, but Carbonite Server edges out with its enhanced recovery and security features.

Room for Improvement: N-able Cove Data Protection users point out the need for improved reporting tools, enhanced user management capabilities, and better scalability options. For Carbonite Server, users suggest enhancements in the speed of backups, more intuitive configuration options, and additional support for newer operating systems. While both products have their areas for growth, Carbonite Server users emphasize speed and usability improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able Cove Data Protection is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, which is a significant advantage for users seeking quick setups and reliable support. Carbonite Server also offers a relatively easy deployment process but has mixed reviews regarding customer support.

Pricing and ROI: N-able Cove Data Protection is seen as cost-effective, providing good value given its robust features and support. Carbonite Server’s pricing is higher, but users believe the advanced disaster recovery and security features justify the cost. In terms of ROI, users of both products report satisfying returns, though Carbonite Server’s higher price point might be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able Cove Data Protection

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

34th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (8th), MSP Backup (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able Cove Data Protection is 1.9%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able Cove Data Protection	1.9%
Carbonite Server	1.3%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Per MøllerJacobsen

Senior consultant at Azend A/S

Delivers cost-effective data backup with room for search improvements

The challenges I face especially are those I've mentioned, that finding some specific data in N-able Cove Data Protection is not as easy as it is in some other systems. You cannot just search for something—you need to know where it was and when it was there to restore it, plus it would be nice to take out data from Microsoft 365 in some portable format, which is currently not an option. I would like to extract the data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format, something like a database or maybe just to take out a PST file or SharePoint and Teams files to the file system. Especially in these times, where we discuss potential risks with the Microsoft cloud for European companies, companies would want to know how to access their data from the backup if they suddenly don't have a tenant. I believe there should be the ability to take out data from Microsoft 365 in a portable format. I know that Cohesity is working on making such a thing. It's not there yet; I asked last week for something for forensics, and the support team said it's not possible yet, but I know from our technical account manager they are working on some solutions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

More Carbonite Server pros

"It provides a single dashboard for all types of data protection, we monitor everything through a single dashboard. It simplifies everything overall. It allows us to see everything, whether passing or failing any issues, any problems through a single pane of glass that we don't have to click through or adjust as we go forward."

"What I like the most about it's the ease of use and the reliability that it has when copying information to the cloud."

"I know I won't have an issue if the data is there. The reliability and the confidence that we have is amazing. It doesn't matter. We've had customers have ransomware. We've had customers that have had corruption. We've had customers that have had employees destroy their data. As long as it's been backed up, I know that I can get it back and I know I have nothing to worry about. Our confidence level is very high."

"One of the bigger features and advantages of the solution is that it is easy to integrate with my RMM which is also N-able."

"The most valuable aspect is the added protection of having a cloud-based backup service. It provides redundancy in case of data loss."

"We use a neat feature called VDR status, Virtual Disaster Recovery status. It only works on servers... It's automated. Once or twice a month it will virtually mount the backup and provide a screenshot and advise whether or not there have been any errors."

"The most valuable feature by far is the Virtual Disaster Recovery. On top of that is the bare-metal recovery. The recovery options that we have are great. We have tested the Virtual Disaster Recovery and the bare-metal recovery in just about any scenario you can think of. We have even restored bare metal, a full server, to a laptop, and had full functionality. It's just insane how well it works and how simple it is. It does most of the work for you."

"Because the package includes cloud storage, we don't need to worry about hosting it inside. That was very important to us. And because the vendor has data centers worldwide, our reps in Europe and other places can get to what they need quickly and easily."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pros

Cons

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The one thing they don't are Linux servers, it's Windows only. I understand that directive. I have another product that I use for our Linux servers and stuff, but it would be nice if they had that flexibility on the Linux side. I understand the development and the world is geared towards Windows in 365, I know that's where the clienteles are and the business and the money is."

"There aren’t any challenges. Regarding the additional features, Cove is limited to disaster recovery with Azure. It would be great to make disaster recovery compatible with AWS."

"We would like to have better reporting."

"We don't use the solution’s automated recovery testing because SolarWinds made me cross. When they released it, I went, "Oh, well, that's quite good." Because if you use the system, then it supposedly spins up, and on the portal, it gives you a screenshot of the booted device. So, I phoned up, and I said, "Oh, that's really quite cool. How much is that?" They said, "No, no, no. It's all included in your license." I went, "Okay then," and went and deployed it on about half the fleet. One of the options that our customers have is they can pay us a small amount every month for us to test the recovery just to prove that it's viable, and I thought, "Well, this will do that for us. Nice." Then, in the next invoice, we got a charge for it. While It was not a huge amount, I took offense at the fact that we were told that it would be a no extra cost option that was part of our license, but it turns out that it's chargeable. Therefore, we haven't used it since."

"A better default view on my dashboard would be great. There is a lot of useless information there that it pulls up. They could present the dashboard slightly better, in terms of the extra information after the first five columns. The first five columns are awesome. After that, I don't care about the rest, and there are another seven things after that."

"One area I don't like has to do with the agent that goes on the system... if a system stays offline for some length of time, say for a week or so, I may have to go back in and reinstall the agent to get it back in business. I don't know what's causing that."

"This solution is not very good for image restores, mainly just files. The solution also does not allow you to enable or disable backups. Sometimes, our users will connect via mobile device and it will use their data to perform the backup. If they were able to enable and disable the backup, they would not have this issue."

"The recovery side, the restore side, could be a little more optimized."

More N-able Cove Data Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Cove only takes the data you have on the physical server. I can back that up for long periods of time, and I don't accrue high charges to have the data in the cloud. It stays at one rate. This allows me to forecast payment for the next one or two years and show clients their estimated growth."

"I believe that the price is very reasonable in comparison to other options. It is cheaper than both Redstor and Acronis and, since we are now using our own on-premise cloud, there is absolutely no comparison since we have unlimited storage rather than paying per gigabyte used for their onsite storage. We are currently able to backup fifty computers for the same price that we use to backup five computers."

"There is no per node cost, at least not the way I am doing it. I am on bulk. New customers can be set up on a trial, where they can get things all squared away, then they can switch over to being a billed customer."

"The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less."

"N-able Cove Data Protection is an averagely-priced product."

"The pricing, for now, is good. The package that they gave us recently is pretty good. It depends on how many clients you have, and you pay for certain terabytes per license. These terabytes, if not used, are pooled together."

"When you have a device/appliance on the site quite a lot of the other enterprise class backup people insist that you have their appliance, which is frankly offensively expensive. Because when you pry the top off, it's just a standard 19-inch tin box with a standard Intel I5 in it, some RAM, and a hard drive. Then, you go, "Why have they just charged me 5,500 quid for a box, which I could have probably build for under 500." Whereas, with the SolarWinds product, they don't have that. The backup appliances that we have onsite are just plain cooking PCs. We can build our own machines, which is reflected in the price that we can offer a customer."

"The cost is around ten dollars per workstation a month and that includes a certain amount of data."

More N-able Cove Data Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N-able Backup?

In terms of pricing, N-able Cove Data Protection is neither cheap nor expensive compared to other competitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Backup?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able Backup?

Our main use cases for enabling N-able Cove Data Protection include backing up our customers' data on servers hosted in data centers and servers hosted in our own data center, as well as a few onsi...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

Datto Cloud Continuity vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Boxafe vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Backup vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs N-able Cove Data Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More N-able Cove Data Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

February 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able Cove Data Protection

February 2026

Download N-able Cove Data Protection product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

N-able Backup, SolarWinds Backup, SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, SolarWinds MSP Backup

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

Cove Data Protection, from N-able, is a comprehensive solution designed to safeguard critical business data. It offers a range of features including backup and recovery, disaster recovery, and endpoint protection. With automated backups and flexible scheduling options, it ensures data is protected and easily recoverable.

The solution also includes advanced security measures such as encryption and ransomware detection to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches. Cove Data Protection provides seamless integration with various platforms and offers centralized management for efficient monitoring and control.

With its user-friendly interface and robust capabilities, Cove Data Protection is an ideal choice for businesses seeking reliable data protection.

N-able

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Computer Depot, Leading Edge Computers, IT Logic Australia

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

March 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. N-able Cove Data Protection report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.