Camunda vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM comparison

Camunda and TIBCO are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #32 with an average rating of 7.7. Camunda holds a 20.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to TIBCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

21,240 Views
14,235 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Read 7 TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM reviews

502 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Camunda and TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM compete in business process management. Camunda has the upper hand in pricing and support, indicating a better ROI perception among users.

Features: Camunda provides open-source flexibility and lightweight process modeling, offering customizable solutions that integrate with microservices. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is recognized for a robust architecture supporting complex enterprise processes with comprehensive monitoring and optimization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its user interface and documentation for beginners and improve the performance for enterprise-level applications. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM might benefit from simplifying its initial setup, improving user-friendliness, and enhancing flexibility to cater to diverse deployment scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers simpler deployment with a developer-friendly environment, allowing faster project starts and integration. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, though promising scalability, has a complex initial setup but offers robust enterprise support.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda's cost-effective open-source model ensures minimal initial investment, suitable for quick scalability and iterative projects. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, despite higher setup costs, delivers significant returns in extensive, complex deployment scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st)

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Camunda is 20.9%, down from 21.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful workflow definition enhances operational stability and efficiency

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows. It is low code, so you don't need a lot of coding, and tasks are just drag and drop. It is also very stable as we haven't had issues with it going down or encountering any operational issues for a long time. The stability and rich features in workflow definition make it a valuable tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."

"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."

"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."

"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."

"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."

"Camunda is the best among similar solutions like JBPM and Activiti."

"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."

"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."

More Camunda pros

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"It is the best product because of its stability. ActiveMatrix 5.x is highly stable in production, and the downtime is very low. I have worked on a lot of service projects, and the engine is very stable, robust, and scalable. The development and change requests can be pushed quickly, and the mapper activity and SSLT kind of features are also good. It is easy to do changes, testing, and deployment. Its deployment is very easy, and we can automate a lot of scripts for our on-premises solution. I work for an investment bank, and we have automated a lot of processes for our customers. Previously, we used to develop scripts and tools. With version 6.x, everything is moved to Maven and other things. Environment handling is done mostly through DevOps tools. As compared to Mulesoft, the deployment and configuration are very easy in TIBCO."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is powerful for defining workflows."

"The scheduling and the calendar are very useful."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"For specific situations this can be a good solution and a simplified interface to work with."

"The capacity for distributing the jobs in a workflow is an important feature."

Cons

"Lacking in forms visualization."

"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."

"The business model could be easier to understand."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."

"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."

"The product must provide more videos and training materials."

"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."

More Camunda cons

"The product is missing some means of addressing more complex BPM constructs and should interface with more platforms easily."

"ActiveMatrix is in the middle field. MuleDB is more on the engineering side with Java and other things. SnapLogic is there are on the higher side with very low coding. TIBCO stays in the middle like IBM or Oracle. TIBCO can move towards IBM's way of doing. IBM has a big market and many varieties of products and good integration, which TIBCO doesn't have. It can have better integration. TIBCO's transition to the cloud is a little slow. As compared to Dell, Boomi, and Mulesoft. TIBCO took the steps a little later. TIBCO's ID was far better and easier to work with previously. TIBCO's 5.x ID was very good, and the development environment and the transition were easy. Version 6.5 onwards, it is a stable product, but it would be good if they can do something similar to version 5.4 with version 6. They should concentrate on this API market. It will give them the strength and the ability to grab the market back."

"The maintenance of the package could be improved."

"My experience with tech support has not been very good. Most of the time, issues are escalated to level three, where they are either unresolved or take two weeks to address."

"It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU."

"Technical support needs to be streamlined."

"The scalability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."

"We use a community version."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"There are some discussions about perpetual licenses and conversions, but I'm not much familiar with them."

"TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is an expensive tool compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

47%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

It is not lightweight and requires a lot of disk space, memory, and CPU. Making it lightweight so it can run on a minimum processor and less memory would be beneficial. Additionally, the current wo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM?

We are using TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM for network deployment workflows. For example, if a customer is interested in getting a NetWorker, there is a workflow where we log in, get the customer details,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Appian vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 27% of the time

IBM BPM vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 22% of the time

TIBCO iProcess Suite vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Compared 16% of the time

More TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

April 2025

Download TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM is used to develop, deploy, execute and manage Business Process Management centric applications. Use TIBCO Business Studio BPM Edition in conjunction with ActiveMatrix BPM to model business processes. It helps to encompass applications that primarily automate both: business processes (sequences of tasks) to be executed by human users, and technical processes (the flow of data) to be executed by enterprise applications.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

ADIS, Citi, Bank of Montreal, First Citizens Bank

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.