Camunda vs erwin Evolve comparison

Camunda and Quest Software are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Quest Software is ranked #21. Camunda holds a 8.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to Quest Software’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

24,486 Views
5,632 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve

Read 19 erwin Evolve reviews

2,651 Views
1,326 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Camunda

erwin Evolve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Erwin Evolve and Camunda compete in the business process management domain. While Erwin Evolve offers better data analysis tools, Camunda is preferred for its lower setup costs and customization capabilities.

Features: Erwin Evolve provides enterprise architecture modeling, data governance, and integration with other repositories. Camunda offers process automation, workflow management, and an open-source platform that supports BPMN and custom changes.

Room for Improvement: Erwin Evolve's complex setup and client/server dependence could be streamlined for easier use. Camunda could benefit from enhanced ease of initial setup and UI improvements for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Erwin Evolve has a complex deployment process that demands specialized expertise, whereas Camunda ensures a streamlined implementation with excellent documentation and responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Erwin Evolve’s higher setup costs may affect short-term ROI, but its extensive features may justify long-term investment. Camunda provides a cost-effective solution with lower initial costs, offering a favorable short-term ROI due to its open-source model.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. erwin Evolve Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. erwin Evolve

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (6th)

erwin Evolve

Ranking in Business Process Design

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 8.0%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve is 2.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Camunda	8.0%
erwin Evolve	2.1%
Other	89.9%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

ScottLawson

Director IT Architecture at QAD

Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data.

We tried their collaborative web modeling and we used it with a few people but we tend to not use that piece. We tend to collaborate with the people and then my team of architects draws up the diagram using the modeling tool. We then iterate through those. I would like to use it, but it was a little clunky when they first rolled it out. Overall, it's more about the company having room for improvement. What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things. I hear them talking in the support forums and, when I talk to the representative, they say they're going to do a bunch of stuff but it seems the progress is slow. The changes they need to make are to take their old, legacy product, which we use, and focus a lot on it so they can transform it into a modern cloud tool so that we have fewer little pieces to deal with. They could also fix their security model. It's very confusing to get new people onto the tool and to make sure that your content isn't being exposed to the wrong people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."

"I am happy with Camunda BPM."

"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."

"Based on other products, we've found the most appropriate results coming out from the Camunda BPM engine."

"They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot."

"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."

More Camunda pros

"Evolve is like a tank; you can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it."

"Customer Service: Outstanding Technical Support: Outstanding"

"The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature."

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"I can send images in the PDF form, along with the relationships and the associations that are a very important part of what we do. It can show what is affected and what is impacted by a certain change in one area of the system architecture or enterprise architecture. I can very quickly draw those issues and topics to the fore."

"I really liked that it mapped out processes and was able to attach the data model to the appropriate process."

"This is the first time that we have a central repository in our company where we can see and look at all the legacy applications which are used to serve the world."

"The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."

More erwin Evolve pros

Cons

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

"For .NET I have opinion that need more real life examples."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself."

"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."

"Camunda doesn't have a strong forms designer."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain."

More Camunda cons

"Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

"They have improved the search engine a little bit but it can always be improved more. The more data you put inside it, the more you want to use it."

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done."

"They need to develop Evolve's user experience. For example, MEGA has a useful client view that helps with impact analysis. MEGA provides information about the processes, services, infrastructure, and portfolio of applications in one central view. It lets you see the periphery and relationships among components. This view is impressive, and Evolve doesn't have it."

"What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things."

"On upgrade– if the older models in the Workgroup Repository need to be upgraded, allow for a cascade update to newest version through the libraries."

More erwin Evolve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're using the open-source version for now."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"I use the open-source free version."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs Camunda

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 4% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve

Compared 9% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve

Compared 9% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs erwin Evolve

Compared 9% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs erwin Evolve

Compared 5% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs erwin Evolve

Compared 5% of the time

More erwin Evolve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

May 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve

May 2026

Download erwin Evolve product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

Quest Software

Overview

Camunda offers a process orchestration platform that automates and streamlines AI processes while integrating human tasks and diverse systems without sacrificing security, governance, or innovation.

Camunda empowers businesses and IT to collaborate effectively, addressing complexity, enhancing efficiency, and maintaining competitiveness at any speed or scale. Trusted by over 700 organizations including Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, it designs, orchestrates, automates, and improves critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. It is flexible and lightweight, easily integrating with APIs and microservices, while adhering to BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards for comprehensive process modeling and automation.

What are Camunda's standout features?

Flexibility: Adapts seamlessly to diverse environments and requirements.
Lightweight Architecture: Easy integration with existing systems.
Open-source: Allows collaboration and innovation.
BPMN, CMMN, DMN Compliance: Ensures standardized process modeling.
User-friendly Interface: Usability for both technical and non-technical users.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines complex workflows.
Speed and Scalability: Adapts to organizational size and process demands.
Secure Governance: Maintains processes without compromising security standards.
Collaborative Design: Encourages joint development between business and IT.

Organizations use Camunda to automate business processes across industries like banking, logistics, telecommunications, and retail. It supports complex workflows such as loan approvals and integrates third-party applications. Known for managing tasks and process automation, it fits seamlessly with existing systems on-premise or in cloud environments like Azure and AWS.

Camunda

erwin Evolve provides comprehensive graphical support for handling large data models. It offers features such as metadata access, version control, and model comparison, enhancing operational reports and system analytics through its collaborative web-driven design.

erwin Evolve facilitates reverse engineering and database integration, fostering collaboration and process exploration through its web interface. Customizable and easy to configure, it supports workflow configuration and architectural modeling. Users can utilize its capabilities for developing industry models, managing transformation programs, and presenting standard operating procedures. Despite its strengths, there are demands for improved integration, enhanced UML support, and a more modern user experience. Users also express challenges with legacy system updates and call for better connectors and collaborative features.

What are the key features of erwin Evolve?

Graphical Support for Large Data Models: Provides visualization capabilities for complex data structures.
Metadata Access via API: Allows integration and management of metadata across platforms.
Version Control and Model Comparison: Enhances tracking and analysis of model changes.
Collaborative Web Interface: Facilitates teamwork and process exploration remotely.
Architectural Modeling: Supports the design and configuration of enterprise architecture.

What are the benefits and ROI of using erwin Evolve?

Customization and Ease of Configuration: Reduces setup time and adapts to specific organizational workflows.
Enhanced Accessibility and Mobile Usability: Offers access to critical information on the go.
Operational Reports Creation: Generates insights and facilitates informed decision-making.
System Analytics Handling: Provides robust tools for analyzing system performance and integration.

Data-driven organizations in sectors like finance and healthcare implement erwin Evolve for data warehousing, enterprise architecture, and business process modeling. They leverage its capabilities for cataloging architectural elements, linking to CMDBs, analyzing system interfaces, and describing business processes. Utilization extends to IT solution registration, business capability planning, and strategic modeling, with frequent deployments on cloud platforms to support transformation initiatives.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. erwin Evolve

April 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. erwin Evolve

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. erwin Evolve and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. erwin Evolve report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.