We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes."
"It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs."
"It is a stable solution."
"It is a good product for cloud management."
"Technical support has been good."
"The feature that I really liked is the mesh feature. Currently, we are in quarantine, and the request of home users is that they need to cover the whole house or the whole indoor house. Mesh solution works really nice in Cambium environment. Being able to set up access points in advance is a good feature. It lets you set up the whole environment in your lab or any other place before deploying the access points."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The initial setup is easy to handle. It's quite simple."
"For me, the most valuable features are good integration with the customer's existing network and the ease of deployment and configuration. Ruckus products are also easy to learn to manage and deploy for not only our own staff, but also for the IT workers in the customer's organization."
"The scalability has been very good."
"The most valuable feature of Ruckus Wireless is the Beamforming feature."
"Mesh networking and antenna patterns are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The setup is very straightforward."
"The product has some very awesome patents on their radios and their antennas and antenna patterns and how their signaling works. That's why nobody can touch them. If they go head to head with anybody."
"Our IT staff can quickly issue guest passes for vendors and the instructions are very straightforward, requiring very little effort to get connected."
"Analyzes real-time, in-depth network performance."
"The installation and configuration are a bit complex."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"The solution's price could be better."
"If it's in a warehouse, it is very hard to deploy."
"The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage."
"The Cambium user interface and configuration should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"The cost could be slightly improved. It's not on the low end, and it's not in the high end. It's in that middle area, which can be a deciding factor between someone going with this solution versus another one."
"Lacks some analytics features in the control itself."
"Most customers revoke the idea of deploying it when they observe the cost per AP license."
"Could be more user friendly."
"The initial setup was not simple. We were installing indoor and outdoor wireless and this is why it took us three months."
"Ruckus is a bad solution in general. It's pretty old and outdated."
"The pricing needs to be more clear and licensing could be less expensive."
"From my point of view, portal features are something missing in Ruckus Wireless. I want to see Ruckus Wireless integrate a Wi-Fi portal into its product. This would allow for easier user authentication for vendors."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 23 reviews while Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 96 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
