Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Cisco Meraki MR Wireless comparison

Cambium Networks and Cisco are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cambium Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.6, while Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 100% of Cambium Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Read 19 Cambium Networks Wireless LAN reviews

1,098 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Read 3 Cisco Meraki MR Wireless reviews

15 Views
15 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 20, 2025

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN and Cisco Meraki MR Wireless compete in the enterprise wireless networking space. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set and robust cloud-based management capabilities, although Cambium Networks may have advantages in pricing and support.

Features: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN provides reliable connectivity, an easy-to-use management interface, and focuses on scalability with strong security features. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers cloud-based management, advanced analytics, and integration capabilities. Users favor Cisco for its feature-rich environment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN supports straightforward deployment with excellent hands-on assistance, particularly during installation and scalability adjustments. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless supports cloud-based deployment, facilitating remote management and known for responsiveness in customer service. Cisco’s capability for remote management offers an advantage, though Cambium’s strong support credentials stand out.

Pricing and ROI: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cost-effective with lower setup costs and a decent ROI for its functionality and reliability. Cisco Meraki MR Wireless, though higher in initial cost, justifies its pricing with a strong ROI due to its robust feature set and ease of remote management. Cambium is attractive for budget-conscious organizations, while Cisco provides advanced functionality and analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Wireless LAN Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Mike Scofield

Director of Technology at a educational organization with 51-200 employees

Provides efficient, controllerless setup and supports high client numbers

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced and offered a controllerless setup, which was more unusual at the time we first used them. This meant they could operate independently without a controller, unlike many other products that required a controller. Also, they had a software-based controller or management system that we initially used. The product was scalable, allowing for fewer access points to cover more area, and supported a high number of clients. We were able to deploy them across multiple sites within a limited timeframe, thanks to their efficient setup process.

Read full review

Laurie Ellims

Enterprise Architect at Fujitsu

Has lacked advanced features and led to higher costs but has simplified management through cloud access

I don't think there's an advantage with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless; I think it's overpriced for what it does. The pricing is one reason, and there is also a limited feature set without spending more money. If you have a particular device at a site and want to add the advanced feature set, you may have to upgrade the hardware, which increases your costs. In contrast, products such as Palo Alto and Fortinet typically have all those features built in from day one, and they just need to be licensed, if that. There are limitations in terms of scalability. My main concern is that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is overpriced, has limited functionality, and the hardware is not prepared for any further improvements in terms of features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months."

"The cloud-based management provided by Cambium Networks is particularly valuable to us, as it allows us to efficiently manage Wi-Fi, point-to-point connections, firewalls, and switches across various locations from a centralized platform. This enables us to be proactive in providing support and ensures smooth operations for our clients."

"Cambium is more economical compared to Cisco or Ruckus, which makes it suitable for budget-conscious customers."

"It provides good support remotely, and it's very easy to configure."

"We can scale it if we need to."

"It provides strong coverage for outdoor areas."

"The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pros

"As a user of the product, the biggest advantage for me is that it works seamlessly; users can switch between access points, and it works great."

"Cloud management is something I appreciate; it's an easy product to manage in comparison to many others."

"The Meraki controller, which is a cloud-based controller, allows us to manage multiple Cisco Meraki MR Wireless APs and monitor their performance, user connectivity, signal, and the AP performance itself."

"The most useful feature of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is its cloud-based management."

Cons

"I would rate the initial setup of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN as seven out of ten. It's not easy to do some of the access point configurations sometimes, as the policy cannot be mapped easily, which is the reason for my rating."

"The capacity and coverage could be improved."

"We would like this product to have more information data sheets available. At present we cannot easily access details around the full capability of a piece of equipment."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN should improve its pricing."

"The direct technical support from Cambium teams needs to be improved."

"The platform's cost needs improvement."

"The problem with the tool is that its prices are on the higher end."

"I believe there's room for improvement in the configuration options for point-to-point setups directly from the cloud management interface. Currently, the process feels a bit clunky—you monitor the unit in the cloud but need to make configuration changes by editing a text file, then downloading it back to the unit. This method can be error-prone, as even a small mistake in the text file could disrupt the unit's configuration."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN cons

"The challenge with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is that for any Meraki device, you require internet connectivity to get it registered on the cloud."

"Overall, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is a bit pricey; that's the main and probably only disadvantage."

"My main concern is that Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is overpriced, has limited functionality, and the hardware is not prepared for any further improvements in terms of features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the product price as one."

"High-end products from Cambium PTP, point-to-point radio, maybe cost around $1000 per year."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper than Aruba."

"The pricing for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is much cheaper than Meraki. For example, I have to pay $200 for one AP from Cambium, while for a Meraki AP, I have to pay $450 including the user license. Meraki has a higher price over Cambium Networks Wireless LAN."

"The pricing and licensing might vary based on each country's specific needs and telecommunication regulations."

"It's a good price, but not the best price. It's on the higher end of what I would call affordable for small to medium-sized businesses."

"I would place it in the mid-range market segment, balancing affordability and profitability."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Educational Organization

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

It is a stable and secure platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs. Although nominal, these costs are still there.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

I would Cambium Networks to improve by having more products on the product side.I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products. They should also look into getting a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

The cost of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is high; the price of one AP to the end customer is approximately 50,000 INR.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

The challenge with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless is that for any Meraki device, you require internet connectivity to get it registered on the cloud. Most customers do not have internet connectivity due ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

The main use case for my customers is that they are using Cisco Meraki MR Wireless for their Wi-Fi users. Customers use Cisco Meraki MR Wireless across different industries, including plants and en...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 21% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 17% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 13% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

October 2025

Download Cambium Networks Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless

October 2025

Download Cisco Meraki MR Wireless product report

Overview

Information not available

Cambium Networks

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless offers a robust wireless connectivity solution designed for scalability and ease of deployment, making it suitable for modern enterprises seeking reliable network performance.

With its cloud-managed structure, Cisco Meraki MR Wireless provides comprehensive visibility and control over wireless environments, catering to diverse locations and user counts. Its seamless integration simplifies network management, crucial for data-driven decisions in enterprises. The system's configuration and maintenance are streamlined via the intuitive dashboard, ensuring users can optimize performance with minimal effort.

What are the important features of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Cloud Management: Access and control your wireless network from anywhere, providing flexibility and ease of administration.
Seamless Scaling: Effortlessly expand the network as the organization grows without disruption.
Advanced Security: Integrated security features protect against threats and ensure data integrity.
Powerful Analytics: Gain insights into network usage to make informed decisions and optimize performance.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Cisco Meraki MR Wireless?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced operational costs due to simplified management and deployment tools.
Time Savings: Quick setup and easy maintenance lead to significant time savings for IT teams.
Improved Performance: Enhanced network reliability and speed increase productivity and satisfaction.
Scalability: Adaptable solution that supports business growth without needing significant manual intervention.

Healthcare facilities, educational institutions, and retail environments favor Cisco Meraki MR Wireless for its robust security and ease of management in environments demanding reliable connectivity. Its ability to handle high-density environments with minimal latency makes it an asset in education. Retail chains utilize comprehensive analytics to optimize in-store experiences and operations.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Ruckus, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.