CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack comparison

Broadcom and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #68, while Grafana Labs is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Grafana Labs’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

348 Views
205 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 10 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

893 Views
875 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Grafana Enterprise Stack are competing in network monitoring and data visualization. Grafana Enterprise Stack seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced visualization and integration features, making it more comprehensive for in-depth data analysis.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor focuses on monitoring network performance and communication systems efficiently. It provides detailed insights into network health, offers structured support, and facilitates seamless integration into existing environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides advanced visualization tools, integrates with multiple data sources, and allows customizable dashboards, delivering a versatile data exploration experience.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its integration with modern data systems, improve its reporting functionalities, and expand its support for cloud environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack could simplify its learning curve for new users, offer more straightforward out-of-the-box solutions, and optimize its pricing model for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment model with structured support services tailored for network environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premise solutions, supported by a strong global community and professional services. CA's deployment is seamless, while Grafana offers flexibility and extensive community support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires an upfront investment with a predictable cost structure, aiming for quick ROI through improved network management. Grafana Enterprise Stack presents variable pricing based on deployment needs and feature sets, justifying the investment through comprehensive analysis capabilities that enhance data insights and long-term efficiency. CA focuses on dedicated monitoring capabilities, whereas Grafana aligns scalable pricing with its diverse functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (6th), Network Monitoring Software (103rd)

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Muralitharan KS

Software Architect at OSELabs

Effective data visualization and effortless integration with Kubernetes

Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources. It categorizes signals accurately and is easy to integrate with Kubernetes or OpenShift clusters using Helm charts. It helps administrators put in minimal effort due to its automatic data source collection capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

"Grafana's most valuable feature is its ability to provide a graphical representation of data collected from various sources."

"It is truly reliable."

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"The dashboards are pretty good."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"Our productivity has improved with its use."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"The solution should include integration with Power BI."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"If Grafana Enterprise Stack could display transaction queries in dashboard format similar to New Relic, it would provide more options and capabilities for users."

"In terms of what Grafana provides, it just provides the charting tools. Everything else is third-party."

"They could use more small tutorials to explain a bit about how Grafana works."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I use the tool's free license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Grafana Enterprise Stack?

The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

Increased visibility would help improve the solution. Compared to other APM tools, Grafana Enterprise Stack supports all technologies, including AWS and Azure. If Grafana Enterprise Stack could dis...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We are using Grafana Enterprise Stack for monitoring web applications and server behaviors. We also monitor batch jobs, analyzing how the processing occurs on the queue side and how the Kubernetes ...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 30% of the time

OpsRamp vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmk vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 9% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

July 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

July 2025

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

July 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.