CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack comparison

Broadcom and Grafana Labs are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #61, while Grafana Labs is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.6. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Grafana Labs’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Grafana Labs users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,146 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Read 14 Grafana Enterprise Stack reviews

2,518 Views
2,493 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Grafana Enterprise Stack are competing in network monitoring and data visualization. Grafana Enterprise Stack seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced visualization and integration features, making it more comprehensive for in-depth data analysis.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor focuses on monitoring network performance and communication systems efficiently. It provides detailed insights into network health, offers structured support, and facilitates seamless integration into existing environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides advanced visualization tools, integrates with multiple data sources, and allows customizable dashboards, delivering a versatile data exploration experience.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its integration with modern data systems, improve its reporting functionalities, and expand its support for cloud environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack could simplify its learning curve for new users, offer more straightforward out-of-the-box solutions, and optimize its pricing model for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a straightforward deployment model with structured support services tailored for network environments. Grafana Enterprise Stack provides flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premise solutions, supported by a strong global community and professional services. CA's deployment is seamless, while Grafana offers flexibility and extensive community support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires an upfront investment with a predictable cost structure, aiming for quick ROI through improved network management. Grafana Enterprise Stack presents variable pricing based on deployment needs and feature sets, justifying the investment through comprehensive analysis capabilities that enhance data insights and long-term efficiency. CA focuses on dedicated monitoring capabilities, whereas Grafana aligns scalable pricing with its diverse functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (88th)

Grafana Enterprise Stack

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Enterprise Stack is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Grafana Enterprise Stack	0.9%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.5%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Rajan M

Test Lead at Calpine Group

Efficient monitoring and alerting enhance operational insights

With Grafana Enterprise Stack, we can identify issues that New Relic cannot help with. While New Relic requires purchase and supports frontend and backend components, Grafana Enterprise Stack helps identify where issues are occurring. When we need to deep dive into issues, we use New Relic to trace transactions and determine where maximum impact occurs, whether in core size, DB side, or frontend components that slow performance. We first evaluate with Grafana Enterprise Stack, then move to New Relic if we identify performance degradation, such as DB queries taking too much time. Grafana Enterprise Stack responds to queries within 6 to 12 hours. They contact users through email immediately when available. Similarly, New Relic follows the same pattern, responding immediately when requests are raised and resolving issues promptly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"The tool's most valuable feature is real-time monitoring. It helps in securing the application or the node by allowing us to monitor and manage resource consumption during peak times. For instance, from 10 AM to 2 PM, we may experience high memory utilization. It helps us to solve these issues."

"Grafana has enough features around dashboard management. It's got enough plugins to create your dashboards."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana Enterprise Stack is the dashboards."

"The ability to graph actual, live, or on-the-fly activity is valuable; it is an added value to work with Grafana Enterprise Stack and to display results or logs, which are huge in nature, in graphical characters."

"The most valuable features of Grafana for data visualization are its ability to create intuitive dashboards and its wide range of visualization options like graphs, charts, and tables."

"Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful open-source platform with robust capabilities in data visualizations, dashboard creations, and alerting."

"Compared to other packages, Grafana Enterprise Stack is user-friendly and easy to configure quickly."

"Grafana's full observability stack, known as LGTM, is highly valuable."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"Integrating AI capabilities for automated self-healing and reduced manual interventions would be valuable."

"I find Grafana really hard to configure. It's difficult to build the dashboard, and it's non-intuitive. In my opinion, it's very difficult to work with Grafana."

"I have encountered occasional issues with false inputs or incorrect data in Grafana."

"The layout is good, but I think it needs some enhancement based on my experience."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved."

"The connection between metrics, logs, and traces could be improved. Currently, one needs to ingest labels and timestamps for them to be connected, however, drilling down sometimes takes time."

"The tool needs to show only fewer updates."

"I believe there are some areas for improvement in the product. Something that could be better is the time series functionality."

More Grafana Enterprise Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I use the tool's free license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Energy/Utilities Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I am trying to think about its advanced alerting features; we do not use it too much for that. We do get it to report through to our help desk system and if a threshold gets broken, then a ticket i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana Enterprise Stack?

I have switched to a different suite, focusing on customer edge solutions that are mostly Fortinet. To manage it, I use Grafana Enterprise Stack and a whole bunch of tools that we wrote ourselves. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Grafana Enterprise Stack?

We use Grafana Enterprise Stack in all of our clients. I rate this product an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 19% of the time

LiveNX vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 6% of the time

AimBetter vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 5% of the time

Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator vs Grafana Enterprise Stack

Compared 5% of the time

More Grafana Enterprise Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Grafana Enterprise Stack

June 2026

Download Grafana Enterprise Stack product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Grafana Enterprise Stack is a powerful tool for real-time data monitoring and visualization. With its flexible and scalable features, it is widely used for creating dashboards, analyzing metrics, and gaining insights into infrastructure, databases, and applications.

Its valuable features include powerful visualization capabilities, extensive data source integrations, customizable dashboards, a user-friendly interface, and a robust alerting system. Users appreciate its flexibility, scalability, and ability to integrate with different data sources, making it suitable for a wide range of industries and use cases.

Grafana Labs

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

1. Uber 2. PayPal 3. eBay 4. Sony 5. Red Hat 6. IBM 7. Cisco 8. Adobe 9. Expedia 10. Booking.com 11. Airbnb 12. LinkedIn 13. Twitter 14. Netflix 15. Spotify 16. Pinterest 17. Slack 18. GitLab 19. Docker 20. Atlassian 21. Salesforce 22. Microsoft 23. Google 24. Amazon 25. Facebook 26. Apple 27. Intel 28. Oracle 29. SAP 30. VMware 31. HP 32. Dell

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Grafana Enterprise Stack report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.