CA App Synthetic Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #61. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

322 Views
156 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

538 Views
276 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and CA App Synthetic Monitor are both prominent tools in the application performance monitoring space. CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out with its superior user experience and advanced synthetic monitoring functionalities.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers detailed monitoring across various applications and systems, robust problem detection, and resolution features. CA App Synthetic Monitor provides highly effective synthetic transaction monitoring and deeper insights into user experiences.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager could improve in integration, ease of use, and deployment complexity. CA App Synthetic Monitor users suggest enhancements in report customization and reducing setup complexity.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager's deployment model receives mixed reviews, while CA App Synthetic Monitor generally has positive feedback. IBM Tivoli has praised responsiveness and expertise of support, and CA App Synthetic Monitor also reports satisfactory support experiences.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to CA App Synthetic Monitor?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a higher setup cost but a good return on investment due to thorough monitoring capabilities. CA App Synthetic Monitor is perceived as more cost-effective with a quicker realization of ROI due to efficient synthetic monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

48th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

37%

Government

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

The product comes with expensive annual licenses. The product is very good, very reliable but it costs a lot. Barracuda offers the same kind of services at a lower price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CA App Synthetic Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CA App Synthetic Monitor?

If you are sending mail or browsing anything, you don't want to send your traffic without encryption. We use SSL for traffic encryption and ASM for SSL offloading. It is a proxy server for SSL. The...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 100% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 36% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 24% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 21% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 19% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

June 2025

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.