Bugcrowd vs TetraScience comparison

Bugcrowd and TetraScience are both solutions in the AWS Marketplace category. Bugcrowd is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.5, while TetraScience is ranked #78 with an average rating of 6.5. Bugcrowd holds a 0.1% mindshare in AWSM, compared to TetraScience’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bugcrowd users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of TetraScience users who would recommend it.

Bugcrowd

Read 4 Bugcrowd reviews

64 Views
42 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TetraScience

Read 2 TetraScience reviews

152 Views
30 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Bugcrowd

TetraScience

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Bugcrowd and TetraScience are competing in the tech industry, with Bugcrowd specializing in cybersecurity and TetraScience focusing on data integration for scientific research. Bugcrowd holds an advantage in threat intelligence and security, while TetraScience leads in data integration.

Features: Bugcrowd offers advanced threat intelligence, vulnerability management, and a network of security researchers. TetraScience provides data integration tools, seamless connectivity, and interoperability within scientific environments. Each excels in providing solutions specific to their domain needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bugcrowd enables streamlined deployment for cybersecurity and offers efficient support, appealing to security-focused organizations. TetraScience ensures smooth deployment through cloud solutions and responsive service, tailored for scientific research, best suited for data connectivity needs.

Pricing and ROI: Bugcrowd offers competitive pricing with a strong ROI for businesses prioritizing security. TetraScience focuses on a scalable pricing model, enhancing the value of scientific data, optimizing research workflows, and providing significant returns for research organizations emphasizing data integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bugcrowd

Ranking in AWS Marketplace

40th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (14th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th)

TetraScience

Ranking in AWS Marketplace

78th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of Bugcrowd is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TetraScience is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AWS Marketplace

Featured Reviews

George Devasia

DevOps Team Lead at Tata Consultancy

Efficient reports simplify tracking and feedback for cybersecurity submissions

I am a developer working in cybersecurity, and I use Bugcrowd to help companies remove vulnerabilities from their websites. I report vulnerabilities found in applications or customer platforms through Bugcrowd's cloud platform. This allows the cloud team to track submissions, and then the client…

Read full review

Varun Khandavalli

Senior Specialist Engineering Dev. & Integration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Efficient data integration and good automation with challenging configurability

The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met. The application also lacks capabilities within its terminal commands that are not available in their GUI. It requires a lot of configurability, which could be streamlined for an enterprise application user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of Bugcrowd is that it provides a long list of different websites or web applications where I can report vulnerabilities."

"Bugcrowd has programs that disclose rewards and invite researchers to new programs."

"One of the features I like most about Bugcrowd is the ability to create a report in a very easy way."

"I believe Bugcrowd is highly stable."

"I would rate Bugcrowd a ten out of ten."

"Bugcrowd's support team is very active and supportive."

"Working on Bugcrowd has made me a better security engineer since it provides a competitive environment to report successful vulnerabilities."

"The crawler agents they provide, as well as TetraScience exclusive parsers, allow for specific instruments that we use in our labs with proprietary formats to extract data and put it into more standard formats for various purposes."

"The ingestion engines were pretty good."

Cons

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets. If this time could be minimized, it would be very helpful."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them."

"The triaging process has slowed down compared to three years ago. It now takes more time to resolve a reported vulnerability and receive the payout."

"Bugcrowd should provide more access to the reports, similar to HackerOne, allowing for full disclosure once a bug is resolved, so researchers can learn from them. They should improve the responsibility type and response time of their customer support, especially when the issue is urgent."

"There is room for improvement in Bugcrowd's response time when customer input is needed for resolving tickets."

"While functional during ingestion workflows, the automation toolkit required manual processes."

"The application has a difficult-to-use parsing capability, which requires a lot of reengineering when the use case isn't specifically met."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bugcrowd?

I understand the pricing, and it involves rewards of at least one thousand dollars.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bugcrowd?

The tool itself could be improved. I hope to improve next time and perform better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bugcrowd?

I use Bugcrowd ( /products/bugcrowd-reviews ) for finding bugs and vulnerabilities. I have been using it for two years. Besides Bugcrowd ( /products/bugcrowd-reviews ), I also use HackerOne ( /prod...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TetraScience?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TetraScience?

TetraScience is a platform that integrates instruments into a laboratory environment into other software applications that can help leverage the data. In most pharma companies, the application is u...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TetraScience?

I would approach with caution. The platform has a high knowledge gap and the proprietary nature of its parsers and crawling agents. Before approaching TetraScience, have your use case in hand and u...

See all answers

Comparisons

HackerOne vs Bugcrowd

Compared 65% of the time

Synack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 18% of the time

YesWeHack vs Bugcrowd

Compared 10% of the time

Intigriti vs Bugcrowd

Compared 6% of the time

Crowdcurity vs Bugcrowd

Compared 2% of the time

More Bugcrowd Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)

January 2025

Download Bugcrowd product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Marketplace

June 2025

Download TetraScience product report

Overview

By combining a vast and diverse workforce with a results-driven model, crowdsourced security programs outperform traditional methods-every time.

Bugcrowd

TetraScience liberates, unifies, and transforms your raw data into more-than-FAIR, AI-native data.
We bring this AI-native data to life in a rapidly growing suite of next-generation lab data management solutions, scientific use cases, and AI-based scientific outcomes.
Only the Tetra Scientific Data and AI Cloud can liberate your data, engineer it for your most demanding scientific use cases and AI initiatives, and future-proof it so you’re never locked into vendor walled gardens again.

TetraScience

Sample Customers

Zephyr Health, Barracuda Networks, Western Union, Instructure, Aruba Networks, Pinterest, CARD.com, WINK, (ISC)2, StatusPage, WHMCS, Movember

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience

June 2025

Free Report: Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience

Find out what your peers are saying about Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bugcrowd vs. TetraScience report.

See our list of best AWS Marketplace vendors.

We monitor all AWS Marketplace reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.